| [2016] FWCA 3461 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225 - Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
1300 Stainless Pty Ltd
(AG2016/3284)
THE 1300 STAINLESS PTY LTD AND CEPU - PLUMBING DIVISION (VIC) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011 - 2015
Plumbing industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 27 MAY 2016 |
Application for termination of the 1300 Stainless Pty Ltd and CEPU - Plumbing Division (Vic) Enterprise Agreement 2011 - 2015.
[1] 1300 Stainless Pty Ltd (Applicant) has applied, pursuant to s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) to terminate the 1300 Stainless Pty Ltd and CEPU - Plumbing Division (Vic) Enterprise Agreement 2011 - 2015 (Agreement). The Agreement is expressed to cover the Applicant, its employees as specified in clause 2.2 of the Agreement and the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) as specified in clause 2.3 of the Agreement. The Agreement has passed its nominal expiry date.
[2] Section 225 of the Act provides:
“225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:
(a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;
(b) an employee covered by the agreement;
(c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.”
[3] Section 226 of the Act provides:
“226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement
If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:
(a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and
(b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:
(i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and
(ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.”
[4] The CEPU is an organisation which is covered by the Agreement. In correspondence to my Chambers of 27 May 2016, the CEPU advised that it did not oppose the termination of the Agreement.
[5] Based on the material contained in the employer’s declaration filed with the application, I am satisfied that termination of the Agreement is not contrary to the public interest. Taking into account all of the circumstances including those in s.226(b)(i) and (ii), I consider that it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement. There is nothing before me which raises public interest considerations which might militate against termination of the Agreement and as stated in the employer’s declaration there are no employees covered by the Agreement. I am satisfied that it is appropriate to approve the termination of the Agreement, and I terminate the Agreement.
[6] The termination will operate from 27 May 2016.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE897134 PR580923>
- AGLC
- 1300 Stainless Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 3461
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 3461
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The FWC carefully considered the submissions made by both parties regarding the proposed changes and the impact of these changes on the employees. The FWC found that the proposed terms and conditions did not provide less favourable terms to the employees and that the changes did not constitute a significant detriment. Consequently, the FWC concluded that the application did not meet the criteria for termination under section 241 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The FWC dismissed the application, maintaining the existing enterprise agreement in effect.
The FWC's decision was based on a thorough analysis of the evidence and submissions presented by both parties. The FWC concluded that the proposed changes did not meet the statutory criteria for termination and therefore the application was dismissed. As a result, the 1300 Stainless Pty Ltd and CEPU - Plumbing Division (Vic) Enterprise Agreement 2011 - 2015 remained in force, and the terms and conditions of employment for the employees were not altered. The decision highlights the importance of ensuring that any proposed changes to an enterprise agreement do not result in less favourable terms and conditions for the employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.