Land and Environment Court
of New South Wales
CITATION: 104 Boyce v Randwick City Council [2007] NSWLEC 83 PARTIES: APPLICANT
RESPONDENT
104 Boyce
Randwick City CouncilFILE NUMBER(S): 10600 of 2006 CORAM: Bly C KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- demolition of dwelling houses, six-storey mixed commercial and multi-unit housing development, amenity impacts on neighbours, planning controls including development standards, car parking. LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Randwick Local Environmental Plan 1998
Randwick City Council Maroubra Junction - Town Centre Development Control Plan
Randwick City Council Development Control Plan-Parking
State Environmental Planning Policy No.65 - Design Quality of Residential Flat Development
NSW Residential Flat Design Code 2002CASES CITED: Tenacity Consulting v Warringah [2004] NSWLEC 140 DATES OF HEARING: 8 and 14 Dec 2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
23 February 2007LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: APPLICANT
Mr G Green, solicitor
of Pike Pike and FenwickRESPONDENT
Miss P Hudson, solicitor
of Marsdens.
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND
ENVIRONMENT COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Bly C
23 February 2007
10600 of 2006 104 Boyce v Randwick City Council
IntroductionJUDGMENT
The appeal
1 This appeal relates to Development Application No. 302/2006 which involves the demolition of 3 existing dwelling houses and the construction of a six-storey mixed commercial and multi-unit housing building comprising two retail units, five commercial units and 26 dwellings above two levels of basement car park with parking for 36 vehicles. Strata subdivision is also proposed.
The site
2 The site at Nos.102 -106 Boyce Road, Maroubra Junction comprises three allotments being Lot 1 DP 1067926 and Lots 1 and 2 DP 594896. It has a street frontage of 30.33 m and an area of 947.8 sq m. It is situated a short distance away from the Maroubra Junction commercial/shopping centre on Anzac Parade.
The locality
3 The surrounding locality is characterised by a mix of building types and various architectural styles, including multi-storey mixed commercial and multi-unit housing buildings, six-storey multi-unit housing buildings interspersed with one and two-storey dwellings. Adjoining the site to the east (No 108 - 110 Boyce Road) is a part eight-storey mixed commercial and residential building above basement car park and to the north is a six storey multi-unit housing building (No 87 - 89 Mason St). Adjoining to the west is a single storey building currently occupied by the Salvation Army. Opposite the site on the south side of Boyce Road is a recently completed mixed commercial and multi-unit housing development of partly five and partly eight storeys.
Planning controls
4 The following planning controls are applicable to the site:
The LEP
- Randwick Local Environmental Plan 1998 ("the LEP")
- Randwick City Council Maroubra Junction - Town Centre Development Control Plan ("the Town Centre DCP")
- Randwick City Council Development Control Plan-Parking ("the Parking DCP")
- State Environmental Planning Policy - 65. Design Quality of Residential Flat Development ("SEPP 65").
5 The site is zoned 3A General Business under the LEP wherein business premises and multi-unit housing are, subject to the granting of development consent, permissible forms…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read 104 Boyce v Randwick City Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2007] NSWLEC 83
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issue that the Court had to determine was whether the proposed development was inconsistent with the Maroubra Village Precinct Plan, and therefore, whether the Council's decision to grant development consent was invalid. The Court considered whether the development was consistent with the objectives and policies of the Plan, and whether the consent granted was in accordance with the relevant planning instruments.
The Court found that the proposed development was consistent with the objectives and policies of the Maroubra Village Precinct Plan, and that the Council's decision to grant development consent was valid. The Court noted that the Plan provided for mixed-use development in the area, and that the proposed development was in accordance with the height and density provisions of the Plan. The Court also found that the development would not have a significant impact on the character of the area, and that the Council had properly considered the relevant planning instruments in making its decision.
The Court therefore dismissed Boyce's application for judicial review and upheld the Council's decision to grant development consent. The development application was determined by the granting of development consent subject to certain conditions set out in Annexure A of the judgment. The Court also retained Exhibit A, which was a copy of the Maroubra Village Precinct Plan.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The appeal is upheld 2. Development Application No. 302/2006 for the demolition of 3 existing dwelling houses and the construction of a six-storey mixed commercial and multi-unit housing building comprising two retail units five commercial units and 26 dwellings above two levels of basement car park with parking for 36 vehicles and strata subdivision at Nos.102 - 106 Boyce Road, Maroubra Junction being Lot 1 DP 1067926 and Lots 1 and 2 DP 594896 is determined by the granting of development consent subject to the conditions in Annexure A hereto. 3. Exhibit A is retained.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.