Wireless Telegraphy Regulations (Amendment)

Legislation au C1926L00114 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

STATUTORY RULES.

1926. No. 114.

 

REGULATIONS UNDER THE WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY ACT 1905-1919.

I, THE DEPUTY OF THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL, in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, do hereby make the following Regulation under the Wireless Telegraphy Act 1905-1919 to come into operation forthwith.

Dated the thirty-first day of August, 1926.

SOMERS,

Deputy of the Governor-General.

By His Excellency’s Command,

W. C. HILL,

for Postmaster-General.

Amendment of the Wireless Telegraphy Regulations.

(Statutory Rules 1924, No. 101, as amended to this date.)

Payment of available revenue to licensees.

Regulation 62 of the Wireless Telegraphy Regulations is amended by inserting, after sub-regulation (3.) the following sub-regulation:—

“(3a.) Subject to this regulation, the provisions of the law of the State in which any arbitration proceedings are held shall apply to those proceedings:

Provided that no officer of the Postmaster-General’s Department shall be a compellable witness in any arbitration proceedings held under this regulation.”.

 

Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia
by H. J. Green, Government Printer for the State of Victoria

C.12389.—Price 3d.

Overview

The Statutory Rules 1926, No. 114, under the Wireless Telegraphy Act 1905-1919, were enacted to refine the regulatory framework governing the payment of available revenue to licensees and to address procedural issues in arbitration proceedings related to wireless telegraphy. This legislative instrument was introduced to amend the Wireless Telegraphy Regulations and aims to ensure a smoother operation of arbitration processes by incorporating state law provisions, while explicitly excluding Postmaster-General’s Department officers from being compellable witnesses. The regulations were made by the Deputy of the Governor-General, acting on the advice of the Federal Executive Council, and came into effect immediately upon their publication on 31 August 1926.

Scope and Application

The Wireless Telegraphy Regulations 1926, made under the Wireless Telegraphy Act 1905-1919, pertain to the administration and control of wireless telegraphy within the Commonwealth of Australia. These regulations apply to all individuals, businesses, and entities engaged in wireless telegraphy operations, including those involved in the installation, maintenance, and use of wireless telegraphy apparatus. The regulations encompass a wide range of activities, including the licensing of wireless apparatus, the conduct of wireless telegraphy services, and the allocation of frequencies. The jurisdictional reach of these regulations is national, applying uniformly across the Commonwealth of Australia, and they extend to any arbitration proceedings held within the states, subject to the application of relevant state law. However, officers of the Postmaster-General's Department are explicitly excluded from being compellable witnesses in such arbitration proceedings. The regulations can be further extended or restricted by subordinate instruments, allowing for the adaptation and refinement of their application as necessary.

Key Provisions

The primary operative section of the Wireless Telegraphy Regulations (Statutory Rules 1926, No. 114) pertains to the amendment of Regulation 62, specifically by adding a new sub-regulation (3a). This new sub-regulation stipulates that the law of the state where arbitration proceedings are held will apply to those proceedings. However, it also explicitly excludes any officer of the Postmaster-General’s Department from being a compellable witness in any arbitration proceedings governed by this regulation. The obligations and requirements imposed by this regulation include ensuring that any arbitration proceedings related to wireless telegraphy must adhere to the applicable state law where the proceedings are held. This means that the legal framework, procedural rules, and evidence standards of the relevant state will govern these proceedings. Furthermore, the regulation mandates that officers of the Postmaster-General’s Department cannot be compelled to testify in such arbitrations, thereby protecting them from being required to participate as witnesses. The regulation does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breaches. However, the failure to comply with the stipulated state law during arbitration proceedings could potentially lead to procedural errors or legal challenges that might undermine the arbitration's validity. Additionally, any circumvention of the exclusion of Postmaster-General’s Department officers from being compellable witnesses might result in legal disputes regarding the enforceability of such testimonies. While the regulation itself does not specify maximum penalties, any breaches could result in legal actions being taken under the broader legal framework of the state law governing the arbitration.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Technology Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Enforcement Powers
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.