Wharf Notice Revocation (No. 2457) - Lee Breakwater Wharf, Portland, Victoria

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au C2017G00290 In force Gazette

Legislation content

 

 Customs Act 1901

 

Notice under Subsection 15(2)(a)

 

Wharf Notice of Revocation (2457)

 

I, William Ries, delegate of the Comptroller-General of Customs, under paragraph 15(2)(a) of the Customs Act 1901 (Customs Act):

 

REVOKE all notices published in the Gazette appointing the wharf known as Lee Breakwater wharf Portland, in the State of Victoria pursuant to subsection 15(2)(a) of the Customs Act.

 

 

 

This notice commences on 10 March 2017.

 

 

Dated 10 March 2017

 

 

 

Commander

Operational Strategies Branch

Border Management Division

Australian Border Force

Department of Immigration and Border Protection

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, was introduced to regulate the customs and border protection aspects of the nation. One of the key issues it aims to address is the management and control of designated customs wharfs, ensuring they comply with the requirements for handling imported and exported goods. This Act provides the framework for the Comptroller-General of Customs to designate specific wharfs as customs wharfs, thereby facilitating efficient customs operations. The Wharf Notice of Revocation (2457) under the Customs Act 1901, published in the Gazette on 10 March 2017, serves as a mechanism to revoke the designation of the Lee Breakwater wharf in Portland, Victoria, reflecting changes in operational requirements or compliance considerations. This revocation is a clear demonstration of the Act's flexibility and responsiveness to the dynamic needs of Australia's customs and border management systems.

Scope and Application

The Customs Act 1901, as evidenced in the Wharf Notice of Revocation (2457), applies to the designation and management of customs-designated wharves, including the revocation of such designations. This particular revocation affects the wharf known as Lee Breakwater Wharf in Portland, Victoria, which is within the jurisdictional scope of the Commonwealth. The Act applies to any person or entity conducting business at a designated customs wharf, and it governs the conduct and transactions that occur at these locations, ensuring compliance with customs regulations. The revocation of the wharf designation would impact those who previously operated under the specific customs provisions applicable to that wharf. The Act’s reach is national, extending across all states and territories in Australia, with its application overseen by the Australian Border Force, a department within the Commonwealth. Subordinate instruments may further extend or restrict the application of the Act, ensuring the effective administration of customs regulations.

Key Provisions

The Customs Act 1901, as outlined in the Gazette Notice C2017G00290, specifically addresses the revocation of wharf notices that designate certain locations as Customs wharfs. The key operative section in this context is section 15(2)(a), which pertains to the appointment of wharfs under the Customs Act (subsection 15(2)(a)). Section 2457 of the Customs Act empowers the delegate of the Comptroller-General of Customs to issue a notice of revocation for any wharf notices previously published. In this instance, the notice revokes the appointment of Lee Breakwater wharf in Portland, Victoria, as a Customs wharf. The Customs Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the entities governed by it. For the appointed wharfs, the Act requires that they meet specific criteria and standards for handling goods subject to Customs regulations. These requirements include compliance with the procedures set forth by the Customs Act and any additional regulations or guidelines issued by the relevant authorities. The revocation of a wharf notice means that Lee Breakwater wharf is no longer recognised as a Customs wharf, which affects how goods are processed and managed at this location. This change may necessitate adjustments in operations and compliance measures by those involved in the import and export activities at this wharf. The Act also provides for various consequences and penalties for non-compliance with its provisions. If an entity fails to comply with the Customs Act, including the provisions related to wharf notices, it may face administrative, civil, or criminal penalties. The specific penalties can vary depending on the nature and severity of the breach. In cases of deliberate or negligent non-compliance, the maximum penalties can be substantial, potentially including fines and imprisonment. The revocation notice itself serves as an official communication of the change in status, ensuring that all parties are informed and can adjust their practices accordingly. In summary, the Customs Act 1901, as evidenced by the Wharf Notice of Revocation (2457), revokes the designation of Lee Breakwater wharf in Portland, Victoria, as a Customs wharf. This revocation imposes specific obligations on the entities previously operating under the Customs Act, requiring them to adhere to updated procedures and compliance standards. Non-compliance with the Act's provisions can result in significant penalties, highlighting the importance of adhering to the statutory requirements set forth in the Act.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Gazette Notice
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.