Customs Act 1901
Notice under Subsection 15(2)
Wharf Notice of Revocation (2481)
I, Mark Antill delegate of the Comptroller-General of Customs, under subsection 15(2)(a) of the Customs Act 1901 and in accordance with subsection 33(2A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901:
REVOKE all notices published in the Gazette No GN41 Wednesday,20 October 2010 appointing the port known as Cape Preston Wharf in the Port Cape Preston in the State of Western Australia pursuant to subsection 15(2)(a) of the Customs Act.
Dated 21 of June 2016.
Commander Operations
Strategic Boarder Command
Australian Border Force
Department of Immigration and Border Protection
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was enacted to regulate the importation and exportation of goods, including the administration of customs and excise duties, and to provide for related matters. This legislation was introduced to address the need for a comprehensive legal framework governing customs and border protection in Australia. The Act has been amended over the years to adapt to changing trade practices and security requirements. In the context of the Wharf Notice of Revocation, the Customs Act 1901 serves to provide the legal authority for the revocation of wharf notices, ensuring that the administration of customs can be efficiently managed and updated as necessary. This particular revocation was enacted by the Australian Border Force, a delegate of the Comptroller-General of Customs, and aligns with the policy objective of maintaining an effective and responsive customs system.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, as referenced in the Wharf Notice of Revocation, applies to the regulation and administration of customs and excise matters within Australia. This Act provides the legal framework for the control and supervision of goods imported into, and exported from, Australia, as well as the collection of customs duties and excise. The notice specifically revokes the designation of Cape Preston Wharf in the State of Western Australia as a Customs port, impacting any person or entity that was subject to customs regulations at this wharf. The revocation affects the geographic scope by limiting the application to the specified wharf and port within Western Australia, thereby restricting its jurisdictional reach to the Commonwealth level. The revocation notice does not extend to other ports or entities unless explicitly stated in subsequent notices or legislative amendments. Any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds applicable to customs regulations are governed by the broader provisions of the Customs Act 1901 and related subordinate instruments, which may be subject to change through future legislative actions or administrative decisions.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901 (referred to as Section 15(2)) provides the legal framework for the revocation of wharf notices, which designate specific areas within a port for customs operations. In this instance, the Notice under Subsection 15(2) Wharf Notice of Revocation (2481) revokes the designation of Cape Preston Wharf in the Port of Cape Preston, Western Australia, which was previously appointed under the same act. The revocation effectively ends the wharf's status as a designated customs area, impacting the customs procedures that were applicable there.
Entities and parties governed by the Customs Act, such as customs officers, wharf operators, and shipping companies, must adjust their operations in accordance with the revocation of the wharf notice. The revocation means that the customs controls and regulations that were previously enforced at Cape Preston Wharf are no longer applicable, and all activities that were subject to these controls must now comply with the broader customs regulations for the port.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the Customs Act can lead to severe consequences. The Act outlines various offences that may incur penalties. For instance, knowingly making a false statement in relation to customs matters can result in a fine of up to 10,000 penalty units or imprisonment for up to five years, or both (Section 217). Additionally, there are provisions for civil penalties, which can be significant, particularly for large corporations or repeat offenders. The maximum civil penalty for breaches of the Act is 10,000 penalty units (Section 267). These penalties underscore the importance of adhering to the Act's requirements to avoid legal repercussions.