STATUTORY RULES.
1916. No. 236.
_______
REGULATIONS UNDER THE WAR PRECAUTIONS ACT 1914–1916.
War Precautions Regulations 1915—Regulation 59d—Addition.
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL, in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following regulation under the War Precautions Act 1914–1916 to come into operation forthwith.
Dated this twenty-seventh day of September, 1916.
R. M. FERGUSON,
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
G. F. PEARCE.
Minister of State for Defence.
________
War Precautions Regulations 1915.
Addition.
Proof of formal matters not required in certain proceedings.
The War Precautions Regulations 1915 are amended by adding after Regulation 59c, the following Regulation:—
“59d. In any proceedings against the master of a vessel for an offence against these Regulations the averment of the prosecutor—
(a) that the defendant is the master of the vessel; or
(b) that the vessel is a British vessel; or
(c) that the vessel is a merchant vessel, or is engaged in any particular class of trade
shall be deemed to be proved in the absence of proof to the contrary.”
________________________________
Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by Albert J. Mullett, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
C.13014.—Price 3d.
Overview
The War Precautions Regulations 1915 were enacted under the War Precautions Act 1914–1916 by the Governor-General in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting on the advice of the Federal Executive Council. The 1915 Regulations aimed to address the administrative and procedural challenges arising from the enforcement of wartime measures and the prosecution of offences related to maritime activities during the First World War. This particular amendment, Regulation 59d, was designed to streamline proceedings against the masters of vessels by deeming certain averments proved unless disproven, thus expediting legal processes in the context of wartime exigencies. The policy objective of this regulation is to facilitate the efficient administration of justice during a period of heightened national security concerns.
Scope and Application
The War Precautions Regulations 1915, as amended by Statutory Rules 1916 No. 236, apply to any proceedings against the master of a vessel found to be in violation of these regulations, particularly focusing on those instances where the master’s role, the nationality of the vessel, or its type of trade is contested. This amendment to the Regulations pertains specifically to the evidentiary requirements in such legal proceedings, streamlining the process by deeming certain facts as proven unless contradicted. The scope of this regulation extends across the Commonwealth of Australia, impacting vessels operating under Australian jurisdiction. It does not explicitly exclude any categories of vessels or masters but instead provides a procedural simplification that could apply broadly within the ambit of the War Precautions Act 1914–1916. The regulation does not introduce new substantive offences but rather modifies the evidential burden in specific legal contexts, thereby indirectly affecting the enforcement mechanisms under the overarching act.
Key Provisions
The War Precautions Regulations 1915, as amended by Statutory Rules 1916 No. 236, introduce Regulation 59d, which streamlines certain legal proceedings against the master of a vessel. Under this regulation, in any proceedings against a vessel's master for an offence against these regulations, specific averments will be considered proven unless disproven by the defendant. Specifically, it is deemed proved that the defendant is the master of the vessel (59d(a)), that the vessel is British (59d(b)), and that the vessel is either a merchant vessel or engaged in a particular class of trade (59d(c)). This simplification aims to expedite legal processes during wartime by reducing the burden of proof in these specific circumstances.
These amendments impose certain obligations on parties involved in legal proceedings under the War Precautions Regulations 1915. Prosecutors must still bring forth their claims with the necessary averments, but the burden shifts to the defendant to provide contrary proof if they wish to contest these points. This regulatory change aims to ensure that the legal process remains efficient and focused on the core issues at hand, especially during a period of national emergency.
The legislation does not explicitly state new offences or penalties but operates within the existing framework of the War Precautions Act 1914–1916. Any breaches of the War Precautions Regulations 1915, including those addressed by Regulation 59d, would be subject to the penalties outlined in the primary Act. These could include fines, imprisonment, or other sanctions deemed appropriate by the courts. The exact penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the offence, as defined under the overarching War Precautions Act.