WAR PRECAUTIONS ACT REPEAL.
No. 23 of 1928.
An Act relating to section eight of the War Precautions Act Repeal Act 1920-1923.
[Assented to 22nd June, 1928.]
BE it enacted by the King’s Most Excellent Majesty, the Senate, and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia, as follows:—
Short title and citation.
1.—(1.) This Act may be cited as the War Precautions Act Repeal Act 1928.
(2.) The War Precautions Act Repeal Act 1920–1923, as amended by this Act, may be cited as the War Precautions Act Repeal Act 1920–1928.
Shares held by aliens.
2. Section eight of the War Precautions Act Repeal Act 1920–1923 is repealed.
Overview
The War Precautions Act Repeal Act 1928 was enacted to amend the War Precautions Act Repeal Act 1920–1923, specifically addressing the issue of shares held by aliens by repealing section eight of the former Act. The Act was assented to on 22nd June, 1928, by the King’s Most Excellent Majesty, the Senate, and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia. The primary objective of this Act was to remove certain wartime restrictions that had been in place, reflecting a shift towards post-war normalcy and the easing of legislative controls that had been deemed unnecessary following the cessation of hostilities.
This legislative action signifies the Australian government's intent to normalise economic and social activities by removing wartime constraints, thereby facilitating smoother transitions in business and financial transactions. The repealing of section eight, which previously restricted the holding of shares by aliens, aligns with broader post-war policies aimed at restoring economic stability and encouraging investment from non-residents.
Scope and Application
The War Precautions Act Repeal Act 1928 applies to the repeal of section eight of the War Precautions Act Repeal Act 1920-1923, thereby affecting the legal framework surrounding shares held by aliens within Australia. This repeal has a broad application, impacting any person or entity that was previously subject to the restrictions outlined in section eight of the earlier Act, which likely involved regulations concerning the ownership and control of shares by non-Australian citizens or entities. The Act operates nationally across the Commonwealth of Australia, affecting all states and territories uniformly. There are no specific exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds mentioned in the text provided, suggesting that the repeal is comprehensive within its scope. The Act itself does not extend or restrict its application through subordinate instruments as per the given text.
Key Provisions
The primary operative section of the War Precautions Act Repeal Act 1928 (section 1) establishes that this Act may be cited as the War Precautions Act Repeal Act 1928. Section 2 is significant as it repeals section eight of the War Precautions Act Repeal Act 1920-1923. This repeal effectively nullifies any legal provisions or restrictions that were previously in place under section eight of the earlier Act. It is essential to note that the repealed section pertained to shares held by aliens, which means that any previous legal barriers or regulations concerning the ownership or control of shares by non-citizens have been removed.
The War Precautions Act Repeal Act 1928 imposes obligations primarily by removing restrictions that were previously in place. For instance, the repeal of section eight means that there are no longer any legal impediments to aliens holding shares in Australian companies. This change in the law likely facilitates greater ease for foreign investors to participate in the Australian economy by removing barriers to share ownership. The Act's focus on repealing outdated provisions suggests an intention to align the legal framework with current economic and social conditions.
Breaching the provisions of this Act would not typically result in direct penalties or criminal consequences because the Act primarily serves to repeal existing laws rather than impose new ones. However, it is important to understand that the repeal of section eight could have implications for the interpretation and application of related laws. For instance, if any other legislation still references the repealed section, it could lead to legal complexities that need to be resolved through judicial interpretation or further legislative action. There are no explicit penalties mentioned in the Act itself, but any misinterpretation or misapplication of the repealed section could lead to legal disputes that might be addressed in the courts.