Veterans’ Entitlements (Repatriation Private Patient Principles 2004 - Removal of Arrangements for Local Medical Officers) Instrument 2007 (R5/2007)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2007L01223 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

Veterans’ Entitlements (Repatriation Private Patient Principles 2004 – Removal of Arrangements for Local Medical Officers) Instrument 2007.

 

EMPOWERING PROVISION

 

Section 90A of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the Act).

 

PURPOSE

 

The attached instrument amends the Repatriation Private Patient Principles 2004 (RPPPs).  

 

The RPPPs is a legislative instrument made under section 90A of the Act and sets out the circumstances in which the Repatriation Commission may accept financial liability for treatment provided to veterans or their dependants (entitled persons) as private patients. 

 

A person is a private patient if, for the purposes of the Health Insurance Act 1973, they are a private patient of a hospital or if they are treated by a medical specialist at a place other than a hospital.

 

The attached instrument removes a criterion from the definition of “Local Medical Officer” namely that the Local Medical Officer is a medical practitioner who provides treatment to an entitled person under arrangements with the Repatriation Commission. 

 

Prior to the attached Instrument, unless a Local Medical Officer had an arrangement with the Repatriation Commission in relation to treating entitled persons, then under the RPPPs the Repatriation Commission could not accept financial liability for the Local Medical Officer’s services (arrangement-requirement).

 

Arrangements between Local Medical Officers and the Repatriation Commission addressed matters such as fees for treatment, manner of claiming fees and a registration system aimed at securing better services for entitled persons and facilitating accountability.

 

Issuing contracts to new providers and the renewal of contracts for existing providers is a huge task for DVA and likewise imposes a significant burden on busy health care providers.  Accordingly DVA reviewed the situation.

 

It was found that the use of arrangements by the Commission was not necessary for Local Medical Officers or indeed the bulk of health care providers and that the matters addressed in arrangements could be dealt with in the Treatment Principles made under section 90 of the Veterans’ Entitlements act 1986, either directly or indirectly via incorporated documents.

 

Accordingly the Repatriation Commission, acting on advice from DVA, decided to remove the arrangement-requirement from the Treatment Principles and the RPPPs and regulate relationships with Local Medical Officers and other health care providers in a more prescriptive way ie in the Treatment Principles.

 

Under the RPPPs, Local Medical Officers will now no longer need an arrangement with the Repatriation Commission but must provide medical services to entitled persons in accordance with the Treatment Principles in order for the Repatriation Commission to accept financial liability for the Local Medical Officer’s services.

 

The role of a Local Medical Officer under the RPPPs is that he or she may refer an entitled person to a medical specialist without needing to obtain the prior approval of the Repatriation Commission.

 

The amendments made by the attached instrument will not operate in situations where a Local Medical Officer still has a current arrangement/contract with the Commission as previously required by the RPPPs. 

 

Where a current arrangement/contract is on foot, the RPPPs will apply to the situation in the state they were in immediately before they were amended by the attached instrument.  

 

It is only when that current arrangement/contract expires (or is terminated) and the Local Medical Officer refers an entitled person to a medical specialist and claims payment from DVA that the attached amendments would apply.

 

The reason for allowing any current arrangements/contracts with Local Medical Officers to run their course, rather than terminating them, is because terminating several thousands of arrangements/contracts would impose significant demands on both Local Medical Officers and DVA.

 

RETROSPECTIVE

 

No.

 

CONSULTATION

 

Yes, consultation occurred with representatives of Local Medical Officers in a number of DVA/provider consultative forums at various times. 

 

Documents Incorporated-by-Reference

 

Yes.  The Notes for Local Medical Officers” (a non-legislative document) as in force on 1 May 2007 is incorporated into the RPPPs by the attached instrument.

 

At the time the attached instrument was made, the “Notes for Local Medical Officerswas available on the Internet (Department of Veterans’ Affairs web page – under Health – Doctors):

 

http://www.dva.gov.au/

 

At the time the attached instrument was made, the “Notes for Local Medical Officers” was also available at:

 

Department of Veterans’ Affairs (ACT Office), Lovett Tower, 13 Keltie St Woden ACT 2606 / PO Box 21 Woden ACT 2606.  Tel.no.(02) 6289 6243.

 

FURTHER EXPLANATION

 

Attachment A.

 


Attachment A

 

Clauses    Explanation

 

1. sets out the name of the instrument.

 

2. provides that the instrument commences when it is registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.

 

3. contains definitions.

 

4. ensures that the amendments made by the instrument do not apply to the situation where a Local Medical Officer has a current contract or arrangement with the Repatriation Commission (Commission), being a contract or arrangement entered into before the commencement of the attached instrument.  The amendments will only regulate the relationship between the Commission and a Local Medical Officer who refers an entitled person to a medical specialist and seeks payment from DVA, where there is no pre-existing contract or other arrangement between the parties governing that relationship.

 

5. inserts a revised definition of Local Medical Officer” and inserts a new definition of “medical practitioner”.  The definition of Local Medical Officer no longer contains an arrangement-requirement.

 

A Local Medical Officer is a medical practitioner who:

 

  • is registered under the Notes for Local Medical Officers;
  • treats entitled persons in accordance with the terms and conditions in the Treatment Principles and Notes for Local Medical Officers; and
  • has a current provider number from Medicare Australia.

 

A medical practitioner is a person currently registered or licensed as a medical practitioner under a State or Territory providing for the registration or licensing of medical practitioners.

 

6.  inserts new definitions of “Medicare Australia” and “Notes for Local Medical Officers”.

 

 The Notes for Local Medical Officers is a document approved by the Repatriation Commission or the Department of Veterans’ Affairs as in force on 1 May 2007 that sets out the detailed terms and conditions that a Local Medical officer must comply with when providing medical treatment to an entitled person if the Repatriation Commission is to accept financial liability for that treatment.  Other, more general, terms and conditions are set out in the Treatment Principles.

 

 

 

Overview

The Veterans’ Entitlements (Repatriation Private Patient Principles 2004 – Removal of Arrangements for Local Medical Officers) Instrument 2007 amends the Repatriation Private Patient Principles 2004 (RPPPs), a legislative instrument made under section 90A of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986. The objective of this amendment is to remove a criterion from the definition of "Local Medical Officer," specifically that the Local Medical Officer must have an arrangement with the Repatriation Commission to provide treatment to entitled persons. Prior to this amendment, the Repatriation Commission could not accept financial liability for the services of Local Medical Officers who did not have such an arrangement. This change was implemented to streamline the process of issuing contracts to new providers and renewing contracts for existing providers, which had been found to impose a significant administrative burden on both the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA) and healthcare providers. The new arrangements will regulate relationships with Local Medical Officers and other healthcare providers in a more prescriptive way through the Treatment Principles. Consultation with representatives of Local Medical Officers occurred during various DVA/provider consultative forums, and the “Notes for Local Medical Officers” (a non-legislative document) was incorporated by reference into the RPPPs by the attached instrument. The amendments will not apply retroactively and will only affect Local Medical Officers who refer entitled persons to medical specialists and seek payment from DVA without a pre-existing contract or arrangement between the parties.

Scope and Application

The Veterans’ Entitlements (Repatriation Private Patient Principles 2004 – Removal of Arrangements for Local Medical Officers) Instrument 2007 amends the Repatriation Private Patient Principles 2004 (RPPPs), which are made under section 90A of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986. The Act applies to veterans and their dependants who are entitled persons under the legislation, as well as medical practitioners, including Local Medical Officers, who provide treatment to these individuals. The instrument pertains to the Commonwealth of Australia, as it is an instrument made under federal law. The amendments made by the instrument do not apply retrospectively and will only affect Local Medical Officers who do not have an existing arrangement with the Repatriation Commission at the time the instrument takes effect. The purpose of the amendments is to remove the requirement for Local Medical Officers to have an arrangement with the Repatriation Commission, thereby streamlining the process and reducing administrative burdens on both the Department of Veterans' Affairs (DVA) and healthcare providers. The instrument incorporates the "Notes for Local Medical Officers" by reference, providing detailed terms and conditions that Local Medical Officers must comply with to ensure that the Repatriation Commission accepts financial liability for treatment provided.

Key Provisions

The Veterans’ Entitlements (Repatriation Private Patient Principles 2004 – Removal of Arrangements for Local Medical Officers) Instrument 2007 primarily focuses on amending the Repatriation Private Patient Principles 2004 (RPPPs) as per section 90A of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986. It removes the requirement that a Local Medical Officer must have an arrangement with the Repatriation Commission to provide treatment to entitled persons for which the Commission can accept financial liability (Clause 5). This change aligns with the findings that such arrangements were not necessary and that the Treatment Principles could adequately regulate the relationship between the Commission and Local Medical Officers. Local Medical Officers must now treat entitled persons in accordance with the terms and conditions in the Treatment Principles and the Notes for Local Medical Officers (Clause 5). The Act imposes specific obligations on Local Medical Officers and the Repatriation Commission. Local Medical Officers must now be registered under the Notes for Local Medical Officers, treat entitled persons in accordance with the terms and conditions in the Treatment Principles and the Notes for Local Medical Officers, and hold a current provider number from Medicare Australia (Clause 5). The Repatriation Commission is tasked with ensuring that the Treatment Principles and the Notes for Local Medical Officers are adhered to by Local Medical Officers to accept financial liability for the services provided. In terms of breaches and consequences, while the explanatory statement does not explicitly mention offences or penalties, non-compliance with the Treatment Principles and the Notes for Local Medical Officers could potentially lead to the Repatriation Commission declining financial liability for treatment provided. This would mean that Local Medical Officers would not be reimbursed for services rendered to entitled persons, which could have financial implications for both the officers and the entitled persons. The detailed terms and conditions in the Notes for Local Medical Officers, as incorporated by the instrument, would likely provide more specific guidelines and potential sanctions for non-compliance.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Repeal & Amendment
Compliance Obligations
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.