Veterans' Entitlements (Modification of Income Deprivation Rules) Principles 2002

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2005B00064 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Veterans' Entitlements (Modification of Income Deprivation Rules) Principles 2002

Summary

Section 52ZZZQ of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the Veterans' Entitlements Act) provides that the Commission may formulate principles to be complied with by it when making decisions under a number of provisions of the Veterans' Entitlements Act, including subsections 52ZZZB(1), 52ZZZC(3), 52ZZZD(1) and 52ZZZE(1).

The purpose of this instrument is to set out decision-making principles that the Commission must comply with in making determinations under sections 52ZZZB, 52ZZZC, 52ZZZD and 52ZZZE of the Veterans' Entitlements Act. These determinations relate to modifying the way in which the standard ‘disposal of income’ rules would affect an individual.

Background

The Social Security and Veterans’ Entitlements Legislation Amendment (Private Trusts and Private Companies – Integrity of Means Testing) Act 2000 amended the Social Security Act and the Veterans' Entitlements Act to give effect to a measure in the Government's 2000-2001 Budget to revise the means test treatment of private companies and private trusts. The measure aims to ensure that income support pensioners who hold their assets in private companies or private trusts receive comparable treatment under the means test to those income support pensioners who hold their assets directly. The assets and income of the structure will be attributed to the person or persons who control the company or trust, or to the person or persons who were the source of the capital or corpus of the company or trust.

Sections 52ZZZB, 52ZZZC, 52ZZZD and 52ZZZE of the Veterans' Entitlements Act define the way in which the ‘disposal of income rules’ in the Act, which appear at Division 7 of Part IIIB of the Veterans' Entitlements Act, will operate in relation to an individual affected by this measure. These decision-making principles will assist the Commission in modifying the application of those disposal rules, where this is necessary.

Explanation of the provisions

Part 1

Section 1 of the Principles states the name of the instrument and section 2 states that the Principles commence on gazettal. Section 3 contains interpretation provisions. Section 4 sets out the purpose of the instrument.

Part 2

Section 5 sets out the purpose of Part 2 of the instrument, which is to provide decision-making principles that can be used in making a determination, under paragraph 52ZZZB(1)(e) or (f), that where an individual disposes of ordinary income to a trust or company on or after 1 January 2002, and the individual is an attributable stakeholder of that trust or company, or becomes one as a result of the transfer, then the amount of the disposal for the purposes of Division 7 of Part IIIB of the Veterans' Entitlements Act can be taken to be nil, or an amount less than the amount of the original disposal, as the Commission determines.

Section 6 provides definitions that are used in this part of the instrument.

Section 7 states that in the case of an individual, who is not a member of a couple, the Commission should take into account whether at the time of, or as a result of, the disposal to the company or trust, the individual was the sole attributable stakeholder of the company or trust. Often, where this is the case, the individual will be attributed with the full value of the disposed income in any event, being the only attributable stakeholder of the company or trust which is holding the income, and therefore it would be unfair on the income support pensioner to also hold the value of the disposal against them for income test purposes.

Section 8 states that in the case of an individual, who is a member of a couple, the Commission should take into account whether at the time of, or as a result of, the disposal to the company or trust, one or both members of the couple were the sole attributable stakeholders of the company or trust. Often, in these circumstances, the members of the couple will be attributed with the full value of the disposed income in any event, being the only attributable stakeholders of the company or trust which is holding the income, and therefore it would be unfair on the income support pensioners to also hold the value of the disposal against them for income test purposes.

Section 9 applies where an attributable stakeholder of a company or trust disposes of income to that entity and either before the time of the disposal there were two or more attributable stakeholders in regard to that entity or, as a result of the disposal, there were two or more attributable stakeholders. In this situation the Commission must take into account the attribution percentage of all attributable stakeholders of the company or trust both prior to and as a result of the disposal.

Section 10 applies where an individual, who is not an attributable stakeholder of a company or trust, disposes of income to that entity and as a result of the disposal the individual became an attributable stakeholder of the company or trust. In this case the Commission must take into account the attribution percentages of all attributable stakeholders prior to, and as a result of, the disposal. Where an individual disposes of income to a company or trust, but ends up with an income attribution percentage of less than 100% in relation to the company or trust, then the Commission may decide only to reduce the amount of the original disposal by an amount equal to the percentage of the income that the individual now is being attributed with, as a result of being an attributable stakeholder of the company or trust.

Part 3

Section 11 sets out the purpose of Part 3 of the instrument, which is to provide decision-making principles that can be used in making a determination, under paragraph 52ZZZC(3)(a) or (b). The effect of subsection 52ZZZC(1) is that, where a company or trust, in regard to which the individual is an attributable stakeholder, disposes of income then, for the purposes of Division 7 of Part IIIB of the Veterans' Entitlements Act, it will be taken as if the individual had disposed of income, or a percentage of the income equal to the individual’s income attribution percentage, that he or she had owned personally. Paragraphs 52ZZZC(3)(a) and (b) allow the Commission to exempt a disposal of specified income from the operation of subsection 52ZZZC(1), or reduce the percentage of the income that the individual is taken to have disposed of.

Section 12 states that the Commission must take into account whether a disposal of income, under this Part, is to a person who is an attributable stakeholder of the company or trust making the disposal.

Part 4

Section 13 sets out the purpose of Part 4 of the instrument, which is to provide decision-making principles that can be used in making a determination, under paragraph 52ZZZD(1)(e) or (f). The effect of subsection 52ZZZD(1) is that, where an individual disposes of income to a trust or company before 1 January 2002, and on 1 January 2002 he or she becomes an attributable stakeholder of that trust or company, then the continuing effect of the income disposal rules, which are set out by Division 7 of Part IIIB of the Veterans' Entitlements Act, can be taken to cease, or only apply to the value of the income disposed of reduced by a percentage equal to the attributable stakeholder’s income attribution percentage, or a higher percentage, as the Commission determines, on 1 January 2002.

Section 14 provides definitions that are used in this part of the instrument.

Section 15 will apply where an individual disposes of income to a company or trust prior to 1 January 2002 and on 1 January 2002 the income is still owned by the company or trust that received it from the individual and the value of the income is the same or more than it was on the date of the original disposal. If this section applies, the Commission must consider whether, taking all the circumstances into account, it would be unfair or unreasonable to apply the income deprivation rules to the individual.

Section 16 applies where an individual disposes of income to a company or trust prior to 1 January 2002 and on 1 January 2002 the income is still owned by the company or trust that received it from the individual and the value of the income decreased from what it was on the date of the original disposal. The Commission must also be satisfied that the decrease is not due to any conduct undertaken to avoid or minimise the trust and companies rules at Division 11A of Part IIIB of the Veterans' Entitlements Act. If this section applies, the Commission must consider whether, taking all the circumstances into account, it would be unfair or unreasonable to apply the income deprivation rules to the individual.

Section 17 will apply where an individual disposes of income to a company or trust that then transfers that income to another party for an arms-length price, all prior to 1 January 2002, and on 1 January 2002 the company or trust has retained the sale price as a part of its assets. In this case, the Commission must consider whether, taking all the circumstances into account, it would be unfair or unreasonable to apply the income deprivation rules to the individual.

Section 18 applies where an individual, who is a member of a couple, disposes of income to a company or trust prior to 1 January 2002 and on 1 January 2002 one or both members of the couple are the only attributable stakeholders of the company or trust. If this section applies, the Commission must consider whether, taking all the circumstances into account, it would be unfair or unreasonable to apply the income deprivation rules to the individual. Often, in these circumstances, the members of the couple will be attributed with the full value of the disposed income in any event, being the only attributable stakeholders of the company or trust, which is holding the income, and therefore it would be unfair on the income support pensioners to continue to also hold the value of the disposal against them for income test purposes

Part 5

Section 19 sets out the purpose of Part 5 of the instrument, which is to provide decision-making principles that can be used in making a determination under paragraph 52ZZZE(1)(e) or (f). The effect of subsection 52ZZZE(1) is, that where an individual disposes of income to a trust or company before 1 January 2002, and on 1 January 2002 his or her spouse becomes an attributable stakeholder of that trust or company then the continuing effect of the income disposal rules, which are set out by Division 7 of Part IIIB of the Veterans' Entitlements Act, can be taken to cease, or only apply to the original value of the disposed income reduced by a percentage equal to the spouse’s asset attribution percentage, on 1 January 2002.

Section 20 provides definitions that are used in this part of the instrument.

Section 21 will apply where an individual disposes of income to a company or trust prior to 1 January 2002 and on 1 January 2002 the income is still owned by the company or trust that received it from the individual and the value of the income is the same or more than it was on the date of the original disposal. If this section applies, the Commission must consider whether, taking all the circumstances into account, including the fact that the individual’s spouse is an attributable stakeholder of the company or trust, it would be unfair or unreasonable to apply the income deprivation rules to the individual.

Section 22 applies where an individual disposes of income to a company or trust prior to 1 January 2002 and on 1 January 2002 the income is still owned by the company or trust that received it from the individual and the value of the income decreased from what it was on the date of the original disposal. The Commission must also be satisfied that the decrease is not due to any conduct undertaken to avoid or minimise the trust and companies rules at Division 11A of Part IIIB of the Veterans' Entitlements Act. If the section applies, the Commission must consider whether, taking all the circumstances into account, including the fact that the individual’s spouse is an attributable stakeholder of the company or trust, it would be unfair or unreasonable to apply the income deprivation rules to the individual.

Section 23 will apply where an individual disposes of income to a company or trust that then transfers that income to another party for an arms-length price all prior to 1 January 2002 and on 1 January 2002 the company or trust has retained the sale price as a part of its assets. In this case, the Commission must consider whether, taking all the circumstances into account, including the fact that the individual’s spouse is an attributable stakeholder of the company or trust, it would be unfair or unreasonable to apply the income deprivation rules to the individual.

 

Overview

The Veterans' Entitlements (Modification of Income Deprivation Rules) Principles 2002 was enacted to address the complexities introduced by the Social Security and Veterans’ Entitlements Legislation Amendment (Private Trusts and Private Companies – Integrity of Means Testing) Act 2000. This legislation aimed to ensure that income support pensioners who hold their assets in private companies or private trusts receive comparable treatment under the means test to those who hold their assets directly. The Veterans' Entitlements (Modification of Income Deprivation Rules) Principles 2002 provides decision-making principles that the Commission must comply with when making determinations under sections 52ZZZB, 52ZZZC, 52ZZZD and 52ZZZE of the Veterans' Entitlements Act, concerning the modification of the application of the disposal of income rules. The policy objective of the Principles is to prevent unfairness in the application of the income deprivation rules by taking into account the attribution percentages of all attributable stakeholders in various scenarios. The instrument was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to provide a framework for ensuring fair treatment of veterans under the revised means test provisions.

Scope and Application

The Veterans' Entitlements (Modification of Income Deprivation Rules) Principles 2002 applies to decision-making by the Repatriation Commission under specific provisions of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, which include subsections 52ZZZB(1), 52ZZZC(3), 52ZZZD(1) and 52ZZZE(1). These provisions pertain to modifying the application of the standard 'disposal of income' rules to veterans and their families. The principles are designed to ensure fairness in the treatment of veterans who hold their assets in private companies or private trusts, aligning their means test treatment with those who hold assets directly. The instrument operates at the Commonwealth level and does not explicitly state any exclusions or exemptions. However, its application is subject to the overarching conditions and criteria set out in the Veterans' Entitlements Act and the Social Security Act 1991. The principles are further expanded upon and detailed through subordinate instruments, which provide specific guidelines and conditions for their application in various scenarios.

Key Provisions

The Veterans' Entitlements (Modification of Income Deprivation Rules) Principles 2002 (the Principles) sets out the decision-making principles that must be followed by the Commission when making determinations under certain sections of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the Act). These determinations are intended to modify the way in which the standard 'disposal of income' rules affect an individual, particularly in relation to private companies and trusts. The main sections of the Principles provide guidance on how these modifications should be made. For example, Section 7 provides that if an individual who is not a member of a couple disposes of income to a trust or company, and they become an attributable stakeholder of that entity as a result, the Commission should consider whether it would be unfair to hold the value of the disposal against them for income test purposes. Similarly, Section 8 provides that if an individual who is a member of a couple disposes of income to a trust or company, and one or both members of the couple become attributable stakeholders as a result, the Commission should also consider whether it would be unfair to hold the value of the disposal against them for income test purposes. The Act imposes several obligations on the Commission when making these determinations. The Commission must consider whether it would be unfair or unreasonable to apply the income deprivation rules in certain circumstances, such as where an individual disposes of income to a trust or company prior to 1 January 2002 and on that date becomes an attributable stakeholder of that entity. The Commission must also consider the attribution percentages of all attributable stakeholders of the entity both prior to and as a result of the disposal. Failure to comply with these obligations may result in a determination that is inconsistent with the principles set out in the Act. There are no specific offences or penalties outlined in the Principles for breach of the decision-making principles. However, the Commission's determinations under the Act may have financial consequences for individuals, such as a reduction in their income support payments. In addition, if the Commission fails to comply with its obligations under the Act, it may be subject to legal challenges or other consequences, such as being required to make a new determination that is consistent with the principles set out in the Act. The maximum penalties for offences under the Act are not specified in the Principles, but may include fines or imprisonment depending on the nature and severity of the offence.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Administrative Discretion

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.