Veterans’ Entitlements (Means Test Treatment of Private Trusts–Excluded Trusts) Declaration 2025

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2025L00819 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Veterans’ Entitlements (Means Test Treatment of Private Trusts–Excluded Trusts) Declaration 2025

EMPOWERING PROVISION

The Repatriation Commission (the Commission) makes this instrument under section 52ZZB(4) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the Act).

PURPOSE

This instrument repeals the Veterans' Entitlements (Means Test Treatment of Private Trusts — Excluded Trusts) Declaration 2015 and remakes it before it would otherwise sunset on 1 October 2025.

OVERVIEW

Section 52ZZB of the Act defines a trust that is a “designated private trust” for the purposes of ascertaining a person’s income or assets for means testing purposes under Division 11A of Part IIIB of the Act. Amongst other things, that definition requires that a designated private trust not be an “excluded trust” as specified by the Commission in a legislative instrument made under subsection 52ZZB(4).

This instrument specifies the following classes of trusts as excluded trusts under the authority of that subsection:

  1.       Community trusts, that:
  1.    have the sole or dominant purpose of:
  1.             receiving, managing or distributing property transferred directly to it, or through an interposed entity, by a government body for a community purpose; or
  2.             holding, managing or disposing of indigenous-held land, for a community purpose; or
  3.             receiving, managing or distributing income that:
  1.             has been generated from indigenous-held land;
  2.             and is applied for a community purpose.
  1.       Fixed trusts that were created before the reference time of 9 May 2000, that have not since been varied under the trust deed nor received a transfer of property.

Private trusts that are community trusts or fixed trusts within the classes specified in this instrument will thus be excluded from the definition of “designated private trust”. The effect of a trust being an excluded trust is that the income and assets of such a trust will not be attributed to an individual for the purposes of ascertaining the person’s income and assets for means testing purposes under Division 11A of Part IIIB of the Act. In other words, the income and assets from an excluded trust will not be attributed to an individual when calculating income support payments under the Act.

The overall policy objective of the instrument is to apply the same approach taken in the equivalent instrument under the Social Security Act 1991 (SSA), the Social Security (Means Test Treatment of Private Trusts – Excluded Trusts) Declaration 2015 thus maintaining consistency in the application of the assets test for private trusts between income support recipients under the Act and civilian social security recipients under the SSA.

EXPLANATION OF PROVISIONS

Section 1 states the name of the instrument.

Section 2 provides that the instrument commences on the day after it is registered.

Section 3 sets out the authority for the Repatriation Commission making the instrument, namely section 52ZZB(4) of the Act.

Section 4 repeals the Veterans' Entitlements (Means Test Treatment of Private Trusts — Excluded Trusts) Declaration 2015.

Section 5 provides the purpose of the instrument, namely to specify classes of trusts that are excluded trusts for section 52ZZB of the Act.

Section 6 sets out definitions of terms used in the instrument including, “community purpose”, “government body”, “income”, “indigenous-held land” and “reference time.” 

Section 7 and 8 specifies the classes of  excluded trusts for section 52ZZB(4). They are certain community trusts (section 7) and certain fixed trusts created before the reference time (section 8).  “Reference time” in defined in section 6 to mean 7.30 pm in the Australian Capital Territory on 9 May 2000.

Consultation

The Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA) consulted with the Department of Social Services (DSS) who administer a similar instrument under the SSA, the Social Security (Means Test Treatment of Private Trusts – Excluded Trusts) Declaration 2015, to obtain agreement to the redrafting of the instrument and ensure policy consistency.

In remaking the instrument, no policy changes have been made. Thus the asset-test exemption for certain classes of private trusts remains unchanged.  Consequently, DVA did not consult more broadly in the remaking of this instrument.

Human rights implications

This instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared under section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011. A full statement of compatibility is set out in Attachment A.

 

Making the instrument

The instrument is made by the Repatriation Commission.

Approved by

Repatriation Commission

Rule-maker


Attachment A

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

Veterans’ Entitlements (Means Test Treatment of Private Trusts–Excluded Trusts) Declaration 2025

This Disallowable Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 (the recognised rights).

Overview of the Disallowable Legislative Instrument

The Veterans’ Entitlements (Means Test Treatment of Private Trusts–Excluded Trusts) Declaration 2025 (the instrument) repeals the Veterans' Entitlements (Means Test Treatment of Private Trusts — Excluded Trusts) Declaration 2015 and remakes it before it would otherwise sunset on 1 October 2025. The purpose of the instrument is to specify classes of trusts (namely certain community trusts, and certain fixed trusts created before 9 May 2000) as excluded trusts for the purpose of means testing under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA).

The effect of a trust being an excluded trust is that the assets and income of such a trust will not be attributed to an individual for the purposes of ascertaining a person’s income and assets for means testing purposes under Division 11A of Part IIIB of the VEA.

The overall policy objective of the instrument is to apply the same approach taken in the equivalent instrument under the Social Security Act 1991 (the SSA), the Social Security (Means Test Treatment of Private Trusts – Excluded Trusts) Declaration 2015 thus maintaining consistency in the application of means-testing of private trusts between income support recipients under the VEA and civilian social security recipients under the SSA.

Human rights implications

This legislative instrument promotes the right to social security contained in article 9 of the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights.

The right to social security is engaged and promoted by the instrument in that it enables certain classes of trusts to be exempt from the pension means-test under the VEA, preventing the income and assets of certain private trusts from being attributed to an individual for means-testing under the VEA.


Conclusion

This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it engages with and promotes the right to social security.

 

Repatriation Commission

Rule-Maker

Overview

The Veterans’ Entitlements (Means Test Treatment of Private Trusts–Excluded Trusts) Declaration 2025 was enacted by the Repatriation Commission under section 52ZZB(4) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986. This instrument aims to address the sunsetting of the Veterans' Entitlements (Means Test Treatment of Private Trusts — Excluded Trusts) Declaration 2015 on 1 October 2025 by remaking it to maintain its provisions. The primary purpose of this legislative instrument is to specify classes of trusts that are excluded from the definition of “designated private trust” for the purposes of ascertaining a person’s income or assets for means testing under Division 11A of Part IIIB of the Act. These excluded trusts include community trusts with a specific purpose and fixed trusts created before 9 May 2000, which ensures their income and assets are not attributed to an individual when calculating income support payments. The policy objective is to maintain consistency in the application of the means test for private trusts between veterans receiving income support under the Act and civilian social security recipients under the Social Security Act 1991.

Scope and Application

The Veterans’ Entitlements (Means Test Treatment of Private Trusts–Excluded Trusts) Declaration 2025 applies to private trusts that fall within specified categories, ensuring they are excluded from being considered as "designated private trusts" for the purposes of means testing under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986. Specifically, it targets community trusts with the sole or dominant purpose of receiving, managing, or distributing property from a government body for a community purpose, or holding, managing, or disposing of indigenous-held land, or income generated from such land for a community purpose. Additionally, it includes fixed trusts created before 9 May 2000 that have not been varied since. This exclusion means that the income and assets of these trusts will not be attributed to individuals when calculating their eligibility for income support under the Act. The instrument is enacted under the authority of section 52ZZB(4) of the Act and is applicable nationally, aiming to maintain consistency with the approach taken under the Social Security Act 1991. The instrument repeals and remakes the 2015 declaration before its sunset on 1 October 2025, ensuring continuity in policy without any changes to the exemption criteria.

Key Provisions

The Veterans’ Entitlements (Means Test Treatment of Private Trusts–Excluded Trusts) Declaration 2025 (the "Instrument") primarily serves to redefine certain categories of trusts as "excluded trusts" for means-testing purposes under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA). This involves two main operative sections: Section 7 specifies that certain community trusts, which have purposes related to receiving, managing, or distributing property for community purposes, or managing income generated from indigenous-held land, are to be excluded from the definition of a "designated private trust" (Section 52ZZB). Section 8 identifies fixed trusts created before the reference time of 9 May 2000, which have not been varied since their creation, as excluded trusts. These excluded trusts are not attributed to an individual for the purposes of means testing, meaning their assets and income will not be counted towards an individual's total income and assets when calculating income support payments. The Instrument imposes specific obligations on the Repatriation Commission, which is tasked with making this legislative instrument under section 52ZZB(4) of the VEA. It also requires that the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA) consult with the Department of Social Services (DSS) to ensure policy consistency with the Social Security Act 1991 (SSA). This means that the DVA must coordinate closely with the DSS to ensure that the means-testing approach remains uniform across different acts governing income support. Additionally, the Instrument mandates that the human rights implications of the legislation be considered and that the instrument be compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognized under the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011. The Instrument does not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties for breaches. However, the broader legislative context implies that any non-compliance with the means-testing provisions could potentially lead to legal consequences under the VEA. While the Instrument itself does not detail penalties, it is reasonable to infer that any breach of the means-testing rules could result in financial penalties or other consequences as stipulated within the VEA. For example, if the income and assets of an excluded trust were incorrectly attributed to an individual, this could lead to legal actions for recovery of overpaid benefits or other administrative penalties. The consistency with human rights, particularly the right to social security, underscores the importance of accurate application of these provisions to avoid unjust deprivation of benefits.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Declaration
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Repeal & Amendment
Licensing & Registration

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.