Veterans' Entitlements (Attributable Stakeholders and Attribution Percentages) Principles 2001

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2005B00073 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Veterans' Entitlements (Attributable Stakeholders and Attribution Percentages) Principles 1/2001

Summary

Section 52ZZZQ of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the Veterans' Entitlements Act) provides that the Repatriation Commission (the Commission) may make an instrument formulating principles to be complied with by it when making decisions (determinations) under a number of sections of the Veterans' Entitlements Act, including section 52ZZJ.

Pursuant to section 52ZZZQ the Commission made the attached instrument.

The purpose of the instrument is to set out decision-making principles that the Commission must comply with in making determinations under section 52ZZJ of the Veterans' Entitlements Act.  Such determinations relate to whether an individual should not be assessed as an attributable stakeholder of a trust or company and, if they are to be assessed, the asset and income attribution percentages that are applicable.

Background

The Social Security and Veterans’ Entitlements Legislation Amendment (Private Trusts and Private Companies – Integrity of Means Testing) Act 2000 amended the Veterans' Entitlements Act and the Social Security Act to give effect to a measure in the Government's 2000-2001 Budget to revise the means test treatment of private companies and private trusts. The measure aims to ensure that clients who hold their assets in private companies or private trusts receive comparable treatment under the means test to those clients who hold their assets directly. The assets and income of the structure will be attributed to the person or persons who control the company or trust, or to the person or persons who were the source of the capital or corpus of the company or trust.

Section 52ZZJ of the Veterans' Entitlements Act states that where a company is a controlled private company in relation to an individual, or a trust is a controlled private trust in relation to an individual, then, unless the Commission otherwise determines, the individual will be attributed with 100% of the assets and income of the controlled structure. These decision-making principles will assist the Commission in determining whether an individual should not, in fact, be attributed with any of the assets or income of the controlled structure, or should be attributed with a percentage of the assets and income of the structure which is less than 100%.

Explanation of the provisions

Part 1

Section 1 of the Principles states the name of the instrument and section 2 states that the Principles commence on gazettal. Section 3 contains interpretation provisions. Section 4 sets out the purpose of the instrument.

 

 

Part 2

Section 5 sets out the purpose of Part 2 of the instrument, which is to provide decision-making principles that can be used in making a determination, under paragraph 52ZZJ(1)(a) or 52ZZJ(2)(c), that an individual is not an attributable stakeholder of a trust or company.

Section 6 states that this Part applies if an individual would be an attributable stakeholder, but for a determination by the Commission under this Part. The Commission must consider the relationship between the individual and the company or trust, having regard to the circumstances mentioned in this Part and also the reason why, but for a determination under this Part, the individual would be an attributable stakeholder of the company or trust. Taking these considerations into account, the Commission must consider whether there is a sufficient basis to determine that an individual should not be an attributable stakeholder of the company or trust.

Section 7 provides that the Commission must consider whether there are relevant circumstances that make it inappropriate for an individual to be an attributable stakeholder of a company or trust. In particular, the Commission must consider the effect of circumstances arising from the legal structure of the company or trust, the administrative arrangements of the company or trust, and finally, whether the individual can reasonably be expected to exercise effective control in relation to the company or trust.

Section 8 states that where an individual has made a contribution to a company or trust, the Commission must consider the circumstances in which that contribution was made. Those circumstances include the value of the contribution, the proportion that the value of the contribution has to the total assets of the company or trust, the effect of the contribution on the financial position of the company or trust and the amount of any consideration received by the individual for the contribution.

Section 9 provides that the Commission must consider past distributions from the company or trust to the individual, including the number of times, and frequency, that distributions have been made to the individual and the value of those distributions. For the purposes of this section “distribution” is defined to include a distribution of capital or income of a company, or the corpus or income of a trust.

Section 10 states that the Commission must consider the reasonable foreseeability of the individual receiving future distributions from the company or trust, and the likely value of those distributions. In considering this matter the Commission must have regard to the constituent documents of the company or trust. For the purposes of this section “distribution” is defined as for section 9.

Section 11 allows the Commission to consider whether an individual receives any other kind of benefit from the company or trust. For the purposes of this section “benefit” is defined to include a benefit received or derived in the form of property or services, but is not limited to a benefit to which the individual has a legal or equitable entitlement.

Section 12 provides that the Commission must consider whether an individual has been assessed as an attributable stakeholder of any other company or trust under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act or as an attributable stakeholder of any company or trust under the Social Security Act 1991, and, if so, the Commission can then consider the asset and income attribution percentages applied to the individual in relation to any of those companies or trusts.

Section 13 states that the Commission must consider any other circumstances that affect the individual’s involvement with the activities or administration of the company or trust.

Part 3

Section 14 sets out the purpose of Part 3 of the instrument, which is to provide decision-making principles that can be used in making a determination under subparagraph 52ZZJ(1)(b)(ii) or 52ZZJ(2)(d)(ii) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act that an individual has an asset attribution percentage, in relation to the company or trust, of less than 100%.

Section 15 states that this Part applies if an individual would, but for a determination by the Commission under this Part, have an asset attribution percentage of 100%. The Commission must consider the relationship between the individual and the company or trust, having regard to the circumstances mentioned in this Part and whether any of those circumstances provide a sufficient basis to determine that the individual should have an asset attribution percentage of less than 100%.

Section 16 provides that the Commission must consider whether there are relevant circumstances that make it appropriate for an individual to have an asset attribution percentage of less than 100% in regard to the company or trust. In particular, the Commission must consider the effect of circumstances arising from the legal structure of the company or trust, the administrative arrangements of the company or trust, and finally, whether the individual can reasonably be expected to exercise effective control, and, if so, the extent of that control, in relation to the company or trust.

Section 17 states that where an individual has made a contribution to a company or trust, the Commission must consider the circumstances in which that contribution was made. Those circumstances include the value of the contribution, the proportion that the value of the contribution has to the total assets of the company or trust, the effect of the contribution on the financial position of the company or trust and the amount of any consideration received by the individual for the contribution.

Section 18 provides that the Commission must consider past distributions from the company or trust to the individual, including the number of times, and frequency, that distributions have been made to the individual and the value of those distributions. For the purposes of this section “distribution” is defined to include a distribution of capital or income of a company, or the corpus or income of a trust.

Section 19 states that the Commission must consider the reasonable foreseeability of the individual receiving future distributions from the company or trust, and the likely value of those distributions. In considering this matter the Commission must have regard to the constituent documents of the company or trust. For the purposes of this section “distribution” is defined as for section 18.

Section 20 allows the Commission to consider whether an individual receives any other kind of benefit from the company or trust. For the purposes of this section “benefit” is defined to include a benefit received or derived in the form of property or services, but is not limited to a benefit to which the individual has a legal or equitable entitlement.

Section 21 provides that the Commission must consider whether an individual has been assessed as an attributable stakeholder of any other company or trust under the Veterans' Entitlements Act, or as an attributable stakeholder of any company or trust under the Social Security Act 1991 and, if so, the Commission can then consider the asset and income attribution percentages applied to the individual in relation to any of those companies or trusts.

Section 22 states that the Commission must consider any other circumstances that affect the individual’s involvement with the activities or administration of the company or trust.

Part 4

Section 23 sets out the purpose of Part 4 of the instrument, which is to provide decision-making principles that can be used in making a determination under subparagraph 52ZZJ(1)(c)(ii) or 52ZZJ(2)(e)(ii) that an individual has an income attribution percentage, in relation to the company or trust, of less than 100%.

Section 24 states that this Part applies if an individual would, but for a determination by the Commission under this Part, have an income attribution percentage of 100%. The Commission must consider the relationship between the individual and the company or trust, having regard to the circumstances mentioned in this Part and whether any of those circumstances provide a sufficient basis to determine that the individual should have an income attribution percentage of less than 100%.

Section 25 provides that the Commission must consider whether there are relevant circumstances that make it appropriate for an individual to have an income attribution percentage of less than 100% in regard to the company or trust. In particular, the Commission must consider the effect of circumstances arising from the legal structure of the company or trust, the administrative arrangements of the company or trust, and finally, whether the individual can reasonably be expected to exercise effective control, and, if so, the extent of that control, in relation to the company or trust.

Section 26 states that where an individual has made a contribution to a company or trust, the Commission must consider the circumstances in which that contribution was made. Those circumstances include the value of the contribution, the proportion that the value of the contribution has to the total assets of the company or trust, the effect of the contribution on the financial position of the company or trust and the amount of any consideration received by the individual for the contribution.

Section 27 provides that the Commission must consider past distributions from the company or trust to the individual, including the number of times, and frequency, that distributions have been made to the individual and the value of those distributions. For the purposes of this section “distribution” is defined to include a distribution of capital or income of a company, or the corpus or income of a trust.

Section 28 states that the Commission must consider the reasonable foreseeability of the individual receiving future distributions from the company or trust, and the likely value of those distributions. In considering this matter the Commission must have regard to the constituent documents of the company or trust. For the purposes of this section “distribution” is defined as for section 27.

Section 29 allows the Commission to consider whether an individual receives any other kind of benefit from the company or trust. For the purposes of this section “benefit” is defined to include a benefit received or derived in the form of property or services, but is not limited to a benefit to which the individual has a legal or equitable entitlement.

Section 30 provides that the Commission must consider whether an individual has been assessed as an attributable stakeholder of any other company or trust under the Veterans' Entitlements Act, or as an attributable stakeholder of any company or trust under the Social Security Act 1991 and, if so, the Commission can then consider the asset and income attribution percentages applied to the individual in relation to any of those companies or trusts.

Section 31 states that the Commission must consider any other circumstances that affect the individual’s involvement with the activities or administration of the company or trust.

Overview

The Veterans' Entitlements (Attributable Stakeholders and Attribution Percentages) Principles 2001 was enacted to establish principles guiding the Repatriation Commission when making decisions regarding the attribution of assets and income to individuals in relation to private companies or trusts under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986. This instrument was formulated by the Repatriation Commission pursuant to section 52ZZZQ of the Veterans' Entitlements Act. The primary purpose of this legislation is to ensure the equitable treatment of veterans by setting out decision-making principles that the Commission must follow when determining whether an individual should be attributed with assets or income from a controlled company or trust, and if so, the applicable percentage. This approach was introduced to address the issue of inconsistent means test treatment between veterans holding their assets directly and those holding assets through private companies or trusts. The policy objective is to provide comparable treatment, ensuring that the attribution of assets and income reflects the true control and benefit derived by the individual from the company or trust.

Scope and Application

The Veterans' Entitlements (Attributable Stakeholders and Attribution Percentages) Principles 2001 applies to individuals who are, or would be, attributable stakeholders of private companies or trusts, as defined under section 52ZZJ of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986. This Act governs the decision-making process of the Repatriation Commission when determining the attribution of assets and income from private companies or trusts to individuals for the purposes of assessing veterans' entitlements. The principles apply Commonwealth-wide and are instrumental in ensuring that individuals holding assets in private companies or trusts receive equitable treatment under the means test. The Act does not specify any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds but allows for the Commission to make determinations on a case-by-case basis, considering various factors such as the individual's relationship with the company or trust, contributions made, past and future distributions, and other benefits received. The application of these principles is further extended through subordinate instruments, which may provide additional guidelines or modifications to the decision-making process.

Key Provisions

The Veterans' Entitlements (Attributable Stakeholders and Attribution Percentages) Principles 2001 (the Principles) sets out the decision-making principles that the Repatriation Commission (the Commission) must comply with when making determinations under section 52ZZJ of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the Veterans' Entitlements Act). These determinations relate to whether an individual should not be assessed as an attributable stakeholder of a trust or company and, if they are to be assessed, the asset and income attribution percentages that are applicable. The Principles aim to ensure that individuals who hold their assets in private companies or private trusts receive comparable treatment under the means test to those clients who hold their assets directly. This is achieved by attributing the assets and income of the structure to the person or persons who control the company or trust, or to the person or persons who were the source of the capital or corpus of the company or trust. The Commission is obligated to consider various factors when making these determinations. For instance, the Commission must consider the relationship between the individual and the company or trust, taking into account the circumstances mentioned in the Principles and the reason why, but for a determination under this Part, the individual would be an attributable stakeholder of the company or trust. The Commission must also consider whether there are relevant circumstances that make it inappropriate for an individual to be an attributable stakeholder of a company or trust, such as the effect of circumstances arising from the legal structure of the company or trust, the administrative arrangements of the company or trust, and whether the individual can reasonably be expected to exercise effective control in relation to the company or trust. Furthermore, the Commission must consider the circumstances in which an individual has made a contribution to a company or trust, including the value of the contribution, the proportion that the value of the contribution has to the total assets of the company or trust, the effect of the contribution on the financial position of the company or trust and the amount of any consideration received by the individual for the contribution. In addition to the above, the Commission must consider past distributions from the company or trust to the individual, including the number of times, and frequency, that distributions have been made to the individual and the value of those distributions. The Commission must also consider the reasonable foreseeability of the individual receiving future distributions from the company or trust, and the likely value of those distributions. The Commission can also consider whether an individual receives any other kind of benefit from the company or trust, and whether an individual has been assessed as an attributable stakeholder of any other company or trust under the Veterans' Entitlements Act or as an attributable stakeholder of any company or trust under the Social Security Act 1991. The Commission can then consider the asset and income attribution percentages applied to the individual in relation to any of those companies or trusts. There are no specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach of the Principles. However, the Commission may face legal challenges if it fails to comply with the decision-making principles set out in the Principles when making determinations under section 52ZZJ of the Veterans' Entitlements Act. Such legal challenges may result in the Commission being required to review its decision-making process and make a new determination that complies with the Principles. Failure to do so may result in further legal action being taken against the Commission.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Compliance Obligations
Prohibited Conduct

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.