Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 - Determination of Non-Warlike service - OPERATION TREK (23/11/2000)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2006B00951 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

 

Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986

 

Determination of Non-Warlike Service

OPERATION TREK

 

 

 

I, Bruce Scott, Minister for Veterans' Affairs for and on behalf of the Minister for

Defence, determine that service rendered as a member of the ADF assigned for service

on or after 4 November 2000 on OPERATION TREK in the area of operations

specified below is non-warlike service for the purposes of subsection 5C(1) of the

Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986.

 

 The area of operations comprises the Solomon Islands and its territorial sea.

 

 

 

 

Dated 23rd  November        2000

 

 

 

BRUCE SCOTT

Minister for Veterans' Affairs for and on

behalf of the Minister for Defence

 

Overview

The Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, was established to provide a legislative framework for the entitlements of veterans and their families. A significant issue the Act aimed to address was the differentiation between warlike and non-warlike service, which impacts the eligibility and extent of entitlements awarded to veterans. In response to evolving operational contexts, the 1986 Act has been supplemented through legislative instruments, such as the Determination of Non-Warlike Service (OPERATION TREK) issued in 2000. This particular instrument, issued by Bruce Scott, the Minister for Veterans' Affairs on behalf of the Minister for Defence, aimed to clarify the classification of service rendered during OPERATION TREK in the Solomon Islands as non-warlike service, thereby ensuring that the legal definitions within the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 accurately reflect the nature of the service performed by members of the Australian Defence Force.

Scope and Application

The Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, through the legislative instrument F2006B00951, establishes that specific service rendered by members of the Australian Defence Force (ADF) on or after 4 November 2000 on OPERATION TREK in the Solomon Islands and its territorial sea is classified as non-warlike service. This determination is significant for the eligibility and scope of entitlements available to ADF members under the Act. The geographic scope of this classification is limited to the area of operations specified, namely the Solomon Islands and its territorial sea, thereby providing clarity for veterans' affairs and the Department of Defence regarding the nature of the service provided in this specific context. The legislative instrument extends the application of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 by clarifying the classification of service in a particular operational area, impacting the entitlements that may be applicable to ADF members who served in this capacity.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of this legislative instrument (Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 Determination of Non-Warlike ServiceOPERATION TREK) revolve around the definition of non-warlike service in the context of veterans' entitlements. Specifically, section 5C(1) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 is amended by this determination, which identifies certain service as non-warlike. This means that service rendered by members of the Australian Defence Force (ADF) on or after 4 November 2000 on OPERATION TREK in the area of operations specified is not considered warlike service for the purposes of the Act. The area of operations for this determination is limited to the Solomon Islands and its territorial sea. The Act imposes obligations and requirements on both the government and the ADF members involved in this operation. For the government, it requires the Minister for Veterans' Affairs, on behalf of the Minister for Defence, to make the determination of non-warlike service for members assigned to specific operations. This ensures that the entitlements of veterans are accurately assessed according to the nature of their service. For the ADF members, this determination provides clarity on the classification of their service, which is critical for determining their eligibility for various veterans' benefits and entitlements under the Act. In terms of consequences, the legislative instrument does not explicitly state any offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach. However, the accuracy and proper application of this determination are crucial to ensure that veterans receive the correct entitlements. Incorrect classification of service could potentially lead to disputes and legal challenges regarding veterans' benefits. The Minister’s role in making this determination is therefore pivotal in maintaining the integrity of the entitlements process. The overarching aim is to provide clarity and fairness in the application of veterans' benefits, ensuring that those who served in non-warlike conditions are appropriately recognised and compensated.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Affairs
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Offence Provisions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.