Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986
Determination of non-warlike service (OPERATION JOINT GUARDIAN)
I, Bruce Scott, Minister for Veterans' Affairs for and on behalf of the Minister for Defence, under subsection 5C(1) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the Act), determine that service rendered by a member of the ADF assigned for duty with OPERATION JOINT GUARDIAN in the area of operations specified below during
any period on or after 11 June 1999, is non-warlike service for the purposes of the
Act.
- The area of operations comprises the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, Albania and
the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.
Dated 24th August 1999
BRUCE SCOTT
Minister for Veterans' Affairs for and on
behalf of the Minister for Defence
Overview
The Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, addresses the issue of determining entitlements for veterans based on the nature of their service. One of the key gaps it aimed to fill was the classification of service as either warlike or non-warlike, which significantly impacts the benefits and support available to veterans. The Act provides a framework for such classifications, ensuring that veterans receive appropriate recognition and assistance for their contributions. The legislative instrument in question, issued under the authority of the Act, specifically determines that service rendered by members of the Australian Defence Force (ADF) assigned to OPERATION JOINT GUARDIAN in specified areas from 11 June 1999 onwards is to be classified as non-warlike service. This determination is intended to ensure that the service of these veterans is appropriately recognised and their entitlements accurately assessed.
Scope and Application
The Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, through the Legislative Instrument F2007B00579, addresses the classification of service rendered by members of the Australian Defence Force (ADF) in specific operations, determining certain service as non-warlike. This determination applies to ADF personnel assigned for duty with OPERATION JOINT GUARDIAN in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, Albania, and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, from 11 June 1999 onwards. The Act, as applied in this context, pertains to the eligibility of veterans for certain benefits and entitlements, specifically by characterising the service in question as non-warlike. This decision extends to all ADF members who have served in the specified geographic area during the designated timeframe, thereby affecting their access to particular veterans' benefits under the Act. The geographic scope is confined to the mentioned regions and the temporal scope begins from 11 June 1999, providing a clear framework for the application of the Act's provisions to the affected ADF members.
Key Provisions
The key provision of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, as detailed in the legislative instrument F2007B00579, pertains to the determination of non-warlike service for members of the Australian Defence Force (ADF) assigned to OPERATION JOINT GUARDIAN (section 5C(1)). According to this determination, any service rendered by ADF members in the area of operations, which includes the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, Albania, and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, on or after 11 June 1999, is classified as non-warlike service under the Act. This classification has significant implications for the entitlements and benefits available to veterans who served in this capacity.
The Act imposes certain obligations and requirements on parties governed by this determination. For instance, it mandates that the service in question be accurately documented and verified to ensure that the classification of non-warlike service is correctly applied. This involves maintaining detailed records of the dates, locations, and specific duties performed by ADF members during their service in the designated area of operations. Additionally, the Act requires that any claims for veterans' benefits be substantiated by evidence that aligns with the criteria set out in the determination.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, or providing false information in support of a claim, can result in serious consequences. The Act outlines various offences, penalties, and civil or criminal repercussions for breaches. For instance, knowingly providing false or misleading information in relation to veterans' entitlements is an offence that can lead to substantial fines and, in some cases, imprisonment. The maximum penalties for such offences are specified in the Act, with the severity of the penalty reflecting the seriousness of the breach. It is imperative for all parties involved to adhere strictly to the requirements set forth to avoid these adverse outcomes.