EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Veterans’ Affairs (Private Patient Principles Re-Making) Revocation Instrument 2015
EMPOWERING PROVISIONS
Subsection 90A(4) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA);
Subsection 286(3) of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA);and
Subsection 17(6) of the Australian Participants in British Nuclear Tests
(Treatment) Act 2006 (APBNT(T)A).
PURPOSE
The attached instrument is part of an exercise that resolves a drafting format issue associated with the three sets of “Private Patient Principles” administered by the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA) under the Acts mentioned above. No policy change is involved.
The attached instrument (2015 No.R35/MRCC35) revokes the Veterans’ Affairs (Private Patient Principles Re-Making) Instrument 2014 (Instrument 2014 No.R79/MRCC79).
The latter instrument re-made the three sets of Private Patient Principles for sunsetting purposes. It was expected by DVA that, on making, the machinery parts of the instrument would separate from the main components of the instrument, being the three sets of Private Patient Principles, and the Private Patient Principles would emerge as stand-alone instruments. According to the Office of Parliamentary Counsel that did not happen with the result that the three sets of Private Patient Principles remained in one overarching instrument.
The Private Patient Principles were valid but were not easily identifiable which is not good legal policy. Accordingly the attached instrument revokes instrument 2014 No.R79/MRCC79 and in a separate exercise the three sets of Private Patient Principles have been made as stand-alone instruments.
CONSULTATION
No – because the attached instrument merely relates to a technical drafting issue.
RETROSPECTIVITY
None.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED-BY-REFERENCE
No.
HUMAN RIGHTS STATEMENT
Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.
The attached legislative instrument does not engage any human right and therefore is compatible with human rights.
Michael Ronaldson
Minister for Veterans’ Affairs
Rule-Maker
FURTHER EXPLANATION OF NEW PROVISIONS
See: Attachment A
Attachment A
Section 1
This section sets out the name of the instrument – the Veterans’ Affairs (Private Patient Principles Re-Making) Revocation Instrument 2015.
Section 2
This section provides that the instrument commences when the Repatriation Private Patient Principles (Instrument 2015 No. R33) commences.
Section 3
This section is a transitional provision that ensures that processes that commenced under the former Private Patient Principles (former Principles) and which were not finalised when the former Principles were revoked, may be finalised under the re-made Private Patient Principles (re-made Principles) as if those processes had commenced under the re-made Principles.
Overview
The Veterans’ Affairs (Private Patient Principles Re-Making) Revocation Instrument 2015 was introduced to address a technical drafting issue in the administration of the "Private Patient Principles" under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, and the Australian Participants in British Nuclear Tests (Treatment) Act 2006. This legislation was enacted by the Minister for Veterans' Affairs, Michael Ronaldson, to rectify an oversight in the previous instrument, the Veterans’ Affairs (Private Patient Principles Re-Making) Instrument 2014, which did not separate the Private Patient Principles from the overarching machinery parts as anticipated. The revocation of the 2014 instrument ensures that the Private Patient Principles are clearly identifiable and function as stand-alone instruments, thereby improving legal clarity and policy administration without introducing any policy changes.
The instrument was developed without consultation as it pertains solely to a technical drafting issue and does not impact retrospective application, human rights, or incorporate any documents by reference. This approach ensures the compatibility with human rights and maintains the integrity of the legal framework governing veterans' affairs in Australia.
Scope and Application
The Veterans' Affairs (Private Patient Principles Re-Making) Revocation Instrument 2015 applies to the administrative framework surrounding the private patient principles established under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, and the Australian Participants in British Nuclear Tests (Treatment) Act 2006. This revocation instrument specifically targets the Veterans' Affairs (Private Patient Principles Re-Making) Instrument 2014, which had previously re-made the private patient principles. The instrument is designed to address a technical drafting issue that resulted in the private patient principles not being easily identifiable within the overarching instrument. By revoking the 2014 instrument, the 2015 instrument aims to ensure that the private patient principles become stand-alone instruments, improving clarity and accessibility in legal terms. The scope of the instrument is limited to the technical correction of the legislative framework and does not involve any substantive policy changes.
Geographically, the instrument's application aligns with the jurisdiction of the Commonwealth of Australia, specifically affecting entities and individuals governed by the aforementioned Acts. The instrument does not impose any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds beyond its technical correction purpose. While the instrument itself is a standalone piece of legislation, it works in conjunction with other instruments that re-make the private patient principles as separate entities. This ensures that any processes initiated under the old principles can be concluded under the new, clearer framework, thereby maintaining continuity and avoiding legal disruptions.
Key Provisions
The Veterans’ Affairs (Private Patient Principles Re-Making) Revocation Instrument 2015 (subsection 90A(4) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, subsection 286(3) of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, and subsection 17(6) of the Australian Participants in British Nuclear Tests (Treatment) Act 2006) addresses a technical drafting issue by revoking the Veterans’ Affairs (Private Patient Principles Re-Making) Instrument 2014. This revocation ensures that the three sets of Private Patient Principles can be identified more clearly and operate as stand-alone instruments rather than remaining in a single overarching instrument. The revocation instrument aims to resolve the issue where the main components of the Private Patient Principles were not properly separated from the machinery parts, making them less identifiable.
The obligations under this instrument primarily concern the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA). It mandates the DVA to ensure that the three sets of Private Patient Principles are correctly separated and function independently. This involves finalizing any processes that were initiated under the former Private Patient Principles before their revocation and ensuring these processes can be completed under the re-made Principles. This transitional provision is critical in maintaining continuity in the administration of benefits and services to veterans and their families, ensuring there is no disruption due to the structural changes in the instrument.
There are no offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences specified for breaches of this revocation instrument. The instrument is a technical measure designed to correct an issue in the drafting of the original instrument, and it does not create new obligations or impose sanctions for non-compliance. The focus is on ensuring clarity and efficiency in the administration of the Private Patient Principles without introducing punitive measures.
The revocation instrument is compatible with human rights, as stated in the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011, because it does not engage any human rights. The changes made are purely administrative and do not affect the rights of veterans or their families. The instrument is designed to enhance the clarity and effectiveness of the legislative framework governing private patient principles, without impacting individual rights or freedoms.