Vehicle Standard (Australian Design Rule 42/04 – General Safety Requirements) 2005 Amendment 4

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2014L01285 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

Vehicle Standard (Australian Design Rule 42/04 — General Safety Requirements) 2005 Amendment 4

 

 

 

Made under section 7 of the Motor Vehicle Standards Act 1989

 

 

 

 

 

 

Explanatory Statement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued by the authority of the Assistant Minister for Infrastructure and Regional Development

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 2014

 

 

CONTENTS

 

1. LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT

2. content and effect of ADR 42/04 and THE amendment

2.1. Overview of the ADR

2.2. Effect of the ADR Amendment

3. best practice regulation

3.1. Business Cost Calculator

3.2. General Consultation Arrangements

3.3. Specific Consultation Arrangements for this Vehicle Standard

3.4. Regulation Impact Statement

4. STATEMENT OF COMPATIBILITY WITH HUMAN RIGHTS

4.1. Overview of the Legislative Instrument

4.2. Human Rights Implications

4.3 Conclusion

 

 

1.                             LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT

Vehicle Standard (Australian Design Rule 42/04 — General Safety Requirements) 2005 Amendment 4 is made under the Motor Vehicle Standards Act 1989 (the Act).  The Act enables the Australian Government to establish nationally uniform standards that apply to new road vehicles when they are first supplied to the market in Australia.  The Act applies to such vehicles whether they are manufactured in Australia or imported.

The making of the vehicle standards necessary for the Act's effective operation is provided for in section 7 which empowers the Minister to "determine vehicle standards for road vehicles or vehicle components".

Vehicle Standard (Australian Design Rule 42/04 — General Safety Requirements) 2005 (ADR 42/04) was originally determined in 2005 and has been subsequently amended three times in 2007, 2011 and 2013.

2.                             content and effect of ADR 42/04 and THE amendment

2.1. Overview of the ADR

The function of this Australian Design Rule is to specify design and construction requirements to ensure safe operation of vehicles.

2.2. Effect of the ADR Amendment

This amendment will delete the detailed part of the rear mudguard (wheel guard) requirement (clause 14.3.3.1) on mopeds and motorcycles.  This is a unique Australian requirement, based on state and territory requirements that existed prior to the establishment of a national vehicle certification system under the Act.

This amendment is minor in nature.  It will remove a cost impost on manufacturers and consumers, without reducing safety.

3.                             best practice regulation

3.1. Business Cost Calculator

It is estimated that this amendment will provide savings of $14.4 million a year.

3.2. General Consultation Arrangements

It has been longstanding practice to consult widely on proposed new or amended vehicle standards.  For many years there has been active collaboration between the Federal Government and the state/territory governments, as well as consultation with industry and consumer groups.  Much of the consultation takes place within institutional arrangements established for this purpose.  The analysis and documentation prepared in a particular case, and the bodies consulted, depend on the degree of impact the new or amended standard is expected to have on industry or road users.

Depending on the nature of the proposed changes, consultation could involve the Strategic Vehicle Safety and Environment Group (SVSEG), Australian Motor Vehicle Certification Board (AMVCB), Technical Liaison Group (TLG), Transport and Infrastructure Senior Officials’ Committee (TISOC) and the Transport and Infrastructure Council.

  • SVSEG consists of senior representatives of government agencies (Australian and state/territory), the National Transport Commission and the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator, the manufacturing and operational arms of the industry (including organisations such as the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries and the Australian Trucking Association) and of representative organisations of consumers and road users (particularly through the Australian Automobile Association).
  • AMVCB consists of technical representatives of government regulatory authorities (Australian and state/territory) that deal with ADR and other general vehicle issues, and the National Transport Commission and the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator.
  • TLG consists of technical representatives of government agencies (Australian and state/territory), the National Transport Commission and the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator, the manufacturing and operational arms of the industry and of representative organisations of consumers and road users (the same organisations as represented in SVSEG).
  • TISOC consists of state and territory transport and/or infrastructure Chief Executive Officers (CEO) (or equivalents), the CEO of the National Transport Commission, New Zealand and the Australian Local Government Association.
  • The Transport and Infrastructure Council consists of the Australian, state/territory and New Zealand Ministers with responsibility for transport and infrastructure issues.

Editorial changes and changes to correct errors are processed by the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development.  This approach is only used where the amendments do not vary the intent of the vehicle standard.

Proposals that are regarded as significant need to be supported by a Regulation Impact Statement meeting the requirements of the Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR) as published in The Australian Government Guide to Regulation and the Council of Australian Governments Principles and Guidelines for National Standard Setting and Regulatory Action for Ministerial Councils and Standard-Setting Bodies.

3.3. Specific Consultation Arrangements for this Vehicle Standard

The proposal was provided to AMVCB and TLG members in March 2014 and to SVSEG members in May 2014.  No objections were subsequently raised. 

As the amendment is minor in nature, and does not increase the stringency of the ADR, there is no need for further consultation through TISOC, the Transport and Infrastructure Council, or the public comment process.

3.4. Regulation Impact Statement

As the amendment does not increase the stringency of the ADR, a Regulation Impact Statement is not required.

Since the decision is made by the Assistant Minister for Infrastructure and Regional Development without reference to the Transport and Infrastructure Council and the proposal is not considered significant, the Office of Best Practice Regulation requirements have been met for this regulatory proposal (OBPR Reference ID 17142).

4.                             STATEMENT OF COMPATIBILITY WITH HUMAN RIGHTS

The following Statement is prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

4.1. Overview of the Legislative Instrument

This amendment will delete the detailed part of the rear mudguard (wheel guard) requirement on mopeds and motorcycles.

4.2. Human Rights Implications

This amendment to ADR 42/04 does not engage any of the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

4.3 Conclusion

This amendment to ADR 42/04 is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.