STATUTORY RULES.
1921. No. 234.
_________
TREASURY REGULATIONS UNDER THE AUDIT ACT 1901-1920.
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following amendment of the Treasury Regulations under the Audit Act to come into operation forthwith.
Dated this fourteenth day of December, 1921.
FORSTER,
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
ARTHUR S. RODGERS,
for the Treasurer.
____________
Treasury Regulations under the Audit Act 1901-1920.
Amendment.
Regulation No. 53 is hereby amended by the deletion of the words—
“In the case of members of the Military Forces, the substantive rank only need be stated.”
and the insertion in their stead of the words—
“In the case of members of the Military Forces, the substantive rank also should be stated.”
______________________
Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by Albert J. Mullett, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1921 No. 234, which amend the Treasury Regulations under the Audit Act 1901-1920, were enacted by the Governor-General in the exercise of their powers under the Commonwealth Constitution. This legislative instrument was introduced to refine the existing regulations concerning the reporting of military ranks within the framework of the Audit Act. The policy objective behind these amendments is to ensure clarity and precision in the documentation of military ranks, thereby enhancing the accuracy of financial and administrative records related to the military forces. The amendment specifically changes the phrasing from “the substantive rank only need be stated” to “the substantive rank also should be stated,” which provides a slight enhancement in the requirement for rank reporting. This change was made with the intention of improving the comprehensiveness of records and ensuring that all relevant details are duly noted.
Scope and Application
The Treasury Regulations under the Audit Act 1901-1920 apply to the conduct of financial audits within the Commonwealth of Australia, focusing specifically on the reporting requirements for members of the Military Forces. These regulations are applicable to individuals and entities involved in the financial auditing process within the Commonwealth. They extend to all members of the Military Forces, affecting their substantive rank reporting in audit documents. The amendment modifies the existing regulation to ensure that both the substantive rank and its equivalent should be stated in audit reports concerning military personnel, thereby enhancing the clarity and comprehensiveness of such reports. The legislative instrument operates nationally, given its issuance under the Commonwealth’s authority, and does not explicitly state any exclusions or thresholds within the provided text. Any further specifications or extensions of the application of these regulations would be detailed in subordinate instruments, which are not elaborated upon in the given legislative text.
Key Provisions
The main operative section of this amendment to the Treasury Regulations under the Audit Act 1901-1920 is Regulation No. 53, which has been modified to specify how ranks should be stated for members of the Military Forces (Reg. 53). The amendment changes the wording from stating that only the substantive rank need be mentioned, to stating that the substantive rank should be mentioned along with any other relevant ranks held by the individual. This means that in official records or reports, the substantive rank of military personnel should be included, and if applicable, any other ranks they hold.
The obligations imposed by this amendment on parties or entities governed by the Audit Act are primarily concerned with the accuracy and completeness of the information recorded regarding the ranks of military personnel. These parties or entities are required to ensure that both the substantive rank and any additional ranks are accurately and fully stated in relevant documents. This ensures transparency and clarity in the official records maintained under the Audit Act.
Breaching these requirements could potentially lead to administrative or procedural consequences, although the specific offences, penalties, or consequences are not explicitly stated in the provided text. However, under the Audit Act, failure to comply with regulations could lead to disciplinary actions, which may include fines or other penalties as prescribed by the Act. The exact nature and extent of these penalties would depend on the specific circumstances of the breach and any relevant provisions within the broader framework of the Audit Act.