STATUTORY RULES.
1909. No. 107.
AMENDMENT OF TREASURY REGULATIONS UNDER THE AUDIT ACTS 1901–1906.
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following amendment of the Treasury Regulations under the Audit Acts 1901–1906, to come into operation forthwith. Such amendment shall supersede the Provisional Regulation (Statutory Rules 1909, No. 72) under the said Acts made on the 21st day of June, 1909.
Dated this 9th day of September, One thousand nine hundred and nine.
DUDLEY,
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
JOHN FORREST.
Treasury Regulation 96 (e) to be amended by the addition thereto of the following words:—
“An order in form 24 or 24a authorizing the payment of Sugar Bounty to any person other than the grower’s banker shall not be recognised unless approved by the Collector of Customs for the State in which the sugar-cane is grown.”
Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by J. Kemp, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
C. 11328.—Price 3d.
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1909, No. 107, amends the Treasury Regulations under the Audit Acts 1901–1906 to address the oversight of payments related to sugar bounty. This legislative instrument was enacted by the Governor-General in Council to ensure that any order authorising the payment of sugar bounty to entities other than the grower’s banker must be approved by the Collector of Customs for the state where the sugar-cane is grown. This amendment was introduced to provide a measure of control and verification over the distribution of sugar bounties, aiming to prevent fraud or misallocation of funds. The regulation was made to provide immediate effect, reflecting a swift response to identified procedural gaps in the existing administrative framework.
Scope and Application
The Statutory Rules 1909, No. 107, amending the Treasury Regulations under the Audit Acts 1901–1906, extends its application to certain financial transactions involving sugar bounty payments. Specifically, the amendment applies to orders in form 24 or 24a that authorise the payment of sugar bounty to entities other than the grower’s banker. These orders will only be recognised if they have been approved by the Collector of Customs for the state in which the sugar cane is grown. This regulation, issued by the Governor-General in the Commonwealth of Australia, is intended to ensure that payments are correctly authorised and regulated, thereby maintaining the integrity and oversight of financial transactions related to sugar bounty. The amendment supersedes a previous provisional regulation, reflecting an ongoing effort to refine and clarify the regulatory framework governing these payments.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of this legislative instrument, Statutory Rules 1909, No. 107, focus on the amendment of Treasury Regulations under the Audit Acts 1901–1906. Specifically, Regulation 96(e) is amended to include a new provision that an order in Form 24 or 24a authorizing the payment of Sugar Bounty to a person other than the grower's banker will not be recognised unless it is approved by the Collector of Customs for the State in which the sugar-cane is grown (Regulation 96(e)). This amendment aims to ensure that any payment of Sugar Bounty must meet specific regulatory criteria, providing an additional layer of oversight and control.
The obligations imposed by this amendment require that any order for the payment of Sugar Bounty must now be approved by the relevant Collector of Customs. This means that both the issuing authority and the Collector of Customs have distinct roles to play in the process. The issuing authority must ensure that the order is in the correct form, while the Collector of Customs must verify and approve the order, ensuring it aligns with the legislative requirements. This dual-layer approval process is intended to maintain the integrity and legitimacy of the payment process.
In terms of compliance, any failure to adhere to the new requirements could lead to significant consequences. The non-recognition of an order not approved by the Collector of Customs means that any unauthorised payments could be deemed invalid, potentially leading to financial discrepancies and legal challenges. Furthermore, the act of issuing an unapproved order could potentially be seen as non-compliance with the statutory regulations, inviting scrutiny and possible penalties.
Regarding the potential penalties and consequences for breaches, the legislative instrument does not explicitly detail specific penalties. However, given the nature of the regulation and its importance in financial oversight, any non-compliance could result in administrative penalties, fines, or other civil consequences. The severity of these penalties would depend on the extent of the breach and the impact it has on the financial and regulatory systems. Additionally, persistent or severe breaches could lead to criminal charges, particularly if they are found to involve fraudulent activities or deliberate non-compliance with the statutory requirements.