Trans-Tasman Proceedings Amendment (Administrative Appeals Tribunal) Regulation 2015

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2015L00304 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Select Legislative Instrument No. 20, 2015

Issued by Authority of the Attorney-General

Trans-Tasman Proceedings Amendment (Administrative Appeals Tribunal) Regulation 2015

The Trans-Tasman Proceedings Amendment (Administrative Appeals Tribunal) Regulation 2015 (the Regulation) is made under Subsection 110(a) of the Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 (Cth) (the Act) providing that the Governor-General may make regulations prescribing matters required or permitted by this Acts to be prescribed. Paragraphs 29(1)(c), 47(1)(b), 49(1)(c) and 63(2)(d) of the Act permit the prescription of Australian tribunals to perform certain functions as set out in the Act. 

The Regulation amends the Trans-Tasman Proceedings Regulation 2012 to prescribe the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to perform certain functions as set out in the Act.

In order for tribunals to enjoy the same expedited procedures as courts under the Act, they must be prescribed under the Trans-Tasman Proceedings Regulations 2012. As the leading merits review tribunal at the Commonwealth level, the Administrative Appeals Tribunal is not yet prescribed.

Prescription under section 9 of the Trans-Tasman Proceedings Regulations 2012 allows the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to issue subpoenas to be served in New Zealand under Part 5, Division 2 of the Act.

Prescription under sections 12 and 13 of the Trans-Tasman Proceedings Regulations 2012 allows the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to give leave to appear remotely from New Zealand under Part 6, Division 2 of the Act.

Prescription under subsection 14(2) of the Trans-Tasman Proceedings Regulations 2012 allows the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to give assistance to New Zealand courts and tribunals in relation to remote appearance from Australia under Part 6, Division 3 of the Act.

The Administrative Appeals Tribunal was consulted on the content of the Regulation and indicated the willingness to be prescribed under sections 9, 12, 13 and 14(2) of the TransTasman Proceedings Regulation 2012. Consultation involved the exchange of correspondence and discussions.

The New Zealand Ministry of Justice was consulted to ensure simultaneous commencement of the amendment in Australia and New Zealand.

The Act specifies no conditions that need to be satisfied before the power to make the Regulation may be exercised.

The Regulation does not incorporate any document by reference.

A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny Act) 2011 is set out in Attachment A.

The Office of Best Practice Regulation was consulted on this Regulation and advised that no Regulation Impact Statement was required.

The Regulation is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

The Regulation commences on 31 March 2015.


ATTACHMENT A

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

 

Trans-Tasman Proceedings Amendment (Administrative Appeals Tribunal) Regulation 2015

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

The Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 (Cth) (the Act) provides a procedural framework for managing litigation with a trans-Tasman element. Subsection 110(a) of that Act provides that the Governor-General may make regulations prescribing matters required or permitted by the Act to be prescribed.

The Trans-Tasman Proceedings Amendment (Administrative Appeals Tribunal) Regulation 2015 (the Regulation) amends the Trans-Tasman Proceedings Regulation 2012 and prescribes the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for the purposes of issuing subpoenas to be served in New Zealand; remote appearances from New Zealand in proceedings before the Tribunal and assistance with remote appearance from Australia in New Zealand proceedings.

Human rights implications

This Legislative Instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

 

 

George Brandis QC

Attorney-General

Overview

The Trans-Tasman Proceedings Amendment (Administrative Appeals Tribunal) Regulation 2015 was made under subsection 110(a) of the Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 (Cth) to allow the Governor-General to prescribe matters required or permitted by the Act. The Act, which was enacted to provide a procedural framework for managing litigation with a trans-Tasman element, initially did not include the Administrative Appeals Tribunal in the list of prescribed Australian tribunals. This gap in the legislation meant that the Tribunal could not enjoy the same expedited procedures as courts under the Act, thereby potentially hindering the efficiency of trans-Tasman legal proceedings. The Regulation was developed in consultation with the Administrative Appeals Tribunal and the New Zealand Ministry of Justice to ensure compatibility and simultaneous commencement of the amendment in both countries. The primary objective of the Regulation is to enhance the capacity of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to participate effectively in trans-Tasman legal processes.

Scope and Application

The Trans-Tasman Proceedings Amendment (Administrative Appeals Tribunal) Regulation 2015 applies to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, an Australian tribunal, and is designed to facilitate its functions in proceedings with a trans-Tasman element. The Regulation, made under the authority of the Attorney-General, amends the Trans-Tasman Proceedings Regulation 2012 to prescribe the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for specific functions outlined in the Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010. These functions include the issuance of subpoenas to be served in New Zealand, the granting of leave for remote appearances from New Zealand in proceedings before the Tribunal, and providing assistance to New Zealand courts and tribunals for remote appearances from Australia. The Regulation ensures that the Administrative Appeals Tribunal can enjoy the same expedited procedures as courts under the Act by being prescribed under the relevant sections of the Regulations 2012. The Act applies at the Commonwealth level and has a trans-Tasman jurisdictional reach, affecting proceedings between Australia and New Zealand. There are no exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds specified in the Regulation itself, though the ability to make such regulations is subject to the conditions outlined in the primary Act. The Regulation extends the application of the primary Act through subordinate instruments by prescribing the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for specific trans-Tasman functions.

Key Provisions

The Trans-Tasman Proceedings Amendment (Administrative Appeals Tribunal) Regulation 2015 (the Regulation) primarily functions to amend the existing Trans-Tasman Proceedings Regulation 2012. Specifically, it prescribes the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) to perform certain functions under the Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 (the Act) (sections 9, 12, 13, and 14(2)). This means the AAT is now authorised to issue subpoenas to be served in New Zealand, allow for remote appearances from New Zealand in proceedings before the AAT, and provide assistance for remote appearances from Australia in New Zealand proceedings. These provisions are designed to streamline cross-border judicial processes and ensure the AAT can operate efficiently under the Act. The obligations and requirements imposed by the Regulation on the AAT include ensuring compliance with the expedited procedures outlined in the Act, particularly those relating to trans-Tasman litigation. The AAT must adhere to the specific protocols for issuing subpoenas in New Zealand, permitting remote appearances from New Zealand, and assisting with remote appearances from Australia. These functions necessitate that the AAT maintains the necessary administrative and logistical frameworks to facilitate such cross-jurisdictional processes effectively. Additionally, the AAT must ensure that its operations align with the requirements of the Act and any other relevant legislation to maintain the integrity of the judicial process. The Regulation does not explicitly state any specific offences or penalties for breaches of its provisions; however, general principles under the Act and associated legislation would apply. Any non-compliance by the AAT with the expedited procedures or failure to adhere to the prescribed functions could result in legal consequences, including potential judicial review or other remedial actions. While the specific penalties are not detailed in the Regulation, breaches of the Act or its subsidiary regulations could lead to civil or administrative penalties, including fines or other sanctions as deemed appropriate by the relevant authorities. These consequences are intended to ensure the AAT's compliance with the expedited procedures and maintain the efficiency of trans-Tasman judicial processes.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Delegated & Subordinate Legislation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Consultation Requirements

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.