Trade Practices (Transfer of Market Dominance) Amendment Act 1986
No. 8 of 1986
An Act to ensure that section 50 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 does not apply to certain acquisitions
[Assented to 1 May 1986]
BE IT ENACTED by the Queen, and the Senate and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia, as follows:
Short title, &c.
1. (1) This Act may be cited as the Trade Practices (Transfer of Market Dominance) Amendment Act 1986.
(2) The Trade Practices Act 19741 is in this Act referred to as the Principal Act.
Commencement
2. This Act shall come into operation on a day to be fixed by Proclamation.
Mergers and other acquisitions
3. Section 50 of the Principal Act is amended by inserting before sub-section (3) the following sub-section:
“(2c) This section does not apply to the acquisition by a person of any shares in the capital, or any assets, of a body corporate where—
(a) before the acquisition, the body corporate was in a position to dominate a market for goods or services; and
(b) as a result of the acquisition, the person is not, and is not likely to be, in a stronger position to dominate that market.”.
NOTE
1. No. 51, 1974, as amended. For previous amendments, see Nos. 56 and 63, 1975; Nos. 88 and 157, 1976; Nos. 81, 111 and 151, 1977; Nos. 206 and 207, 1978; No. 73, 1980; Nos. 61 and 176, 1981; No. 80, 1982; No. 39, 1983; Nos. 63, 73 and 165, 1984; and No. 65, 1985.
[Minister’s second reading speech made in—
House of Representatives on 19 March 1986
Senate on 9 April 1986]
Overview
The Trade Practices (Transfer of Market Dominance) Amendment Act 1986 was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to address specific gaps in the application of section 50 of the Trade Practices Act 1974, which pertains to the prohibition of acquisitions that would substantially lessen competition. This amendment was introduced to prevent the application of section 50 in cases where an acquisition does not result in the transfer of market dominance. The intent of the Act is to ensure that the provisions of the Trade Practices Act do not hinder legitimate business transactions that do not significantly impact competitive dynamics in the market.
The policy objective behind this amendment is to strike a balance between protecting competitive markets and allowing for the rationalisation of businesses without undue regulatory interference, provided that the acquisition does not confer a stronger position to dominate a market. By inserting a new subsection into section 50, the Act clarifies that the prohibition on acquisitions does not apply when the acquired entity was already in a dominant market position and the acquisition does not alter this status. This legislative adjustment aims to foster a competitive business environment while accommodating necessary corporate restructurings.
Scope and Application
The Trade Practices (Transfer of Market Dominance) Amendment Act 1986 is a Commonwealth Act that amends the Trade Practices Act 1974 to modify the application of section 50 concerning the transfer of market dominance through acquisitions. Specifically, this Act introduces a new sub-section (2c) to exclude certain acquisitions from the purview of section 50, which generally prohibits misuse of market power. This exclusion applies to acquisitions where the acquiring person does not, and is not likely to, gain a stronger position to dominate a market that the target corporation previously dominated. The Act applies to any person acquiring shares or assets of a body corporate under the specified conditions and is intended to provide clarity and flexibility in the application of section 50 in the context of mergers and acquisitions. The Act's reach is national, applying across the Commonwealth of Australia, and it does not specify any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds beyond the conditions outlined in the new sub-section. The Act may be further extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, but these are not detailed in the primary text.
Key Provisions
The Trade Practices (Transfer of Market Dominance) Amendment Act 1986 (Act) makes specific changes to section 50 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Principal Act). The key operative sections of this Act, as detailed in section 3, insert a new subsection (2c) into section 50 of the Principal Act. This new subsection provides that section 50 does not apply to acquisitions where the acquired entity was previously in a position to dominate a market for goods or services and the acquisition does not result in the acquiring entity being in a stronger position to dominate that market. This provision aims to ensure that certain acquisitions, which do not enhance market dominance, are not subject to the restrictions imposed by section 50.
Under this Act, there are specific obligations and requirements placed on parties involved in acquisitions. Firstly, any entity considering an acquisition must ensure that the entity being acquired was previously in a position to dominate the relevant market. Secondly, the acquiring entity must demonstrate that the acquisition will not place it in a stronger position to dominate that market. This requires a careful assessment of the market dynamics and the competitive landscape post-acquisition. The Act places the onus on the acquiring entity to provide evidence that the acquisition will not lead to an increase in market power, which could potentially be anti-competitive.
The Act does not explicitly state any specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breaches of its provisions. However, given its amendments to the Trade Practices Act 1974, any failure to comply with the stipulations of section 50 as modified by this Act could potentially lead to legal consequences under the broader Trade Practices Act. This may include actions for contraventions of anti-competitive behaviour, which could result in penalties such as fines, court orders, or other remedies deemed appropriate by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission or the courts. The potential penalties under the Trade Practices Act can be significant, with maximum fines for corporations being substantial, depending on the nature and severity of the breach.