Trade Practices Act 1974 - Consumer Protection Notice No. 7 of 2003 - Permanent Ban on Goods

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au F2010L03297 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Nine permanent bans on unsafe goods under the Trade Practices Act 1974

 

This explanatory statement has been prepared with attention to sections 4 and 26 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA).  It has been prepared by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (the ACCC).  At the time the instruments to which this explanatory statement applies were made, there was not a requirement to provide an explanatory statement.

Background

The Trade Practices Act 1974 (the TPA) empowers the administering Minister to take a range of actions to safeguard the Australian community from unsafe goods. Among other things, the Minister:

  • may declare goods to be unsafe goods by notice published in the Gazette, and
  • may permanently ban unsafe goods 18 months after declaring them to be unsafe if there is no consumer product safety standard in respect of the goods (subsection 65C(7)).

The Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No.2) 2010 together with the Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No.1) 2010, amends the TPA to implement a new national consumer law regime known as the Australian Consumer Law (ACL).

The TPA will be renamed the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (CCA) on 1 January 2011.  The ACL will form Schedule 2 to the CCA. 

Schedule 7 of the Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No.2) 2010 sets out transitional matters relating to the commencement of the ACL.  Item 3 of Schedule 7 provides that a notice under subsection 65C(7) of the TPA that was in force immediately before the commencement of the ACL, continues in force after the ACL takes effect ‘as if’ it were a permanent ban imposed under section 114 of the ACL.

Section 114 of the ACL provides that a Commonwealth Minister may impose a permanent ban on consumer goods of a particular kind if an interim ban exists for those goods, or it appears to the Commonwealth Minister that consumer goods of that kind will or may cause injury to any person or a reasonably foreseeable use (including misuse) of consumer goods will or may cause injury to any person.

Under section 131E of Part XI of the CCA, which will come into effect on 1 January 2011, permanent ban notices, made under section 114 of the ACL are to be made by legislative instrument.  Therefore, in order for pre-existing permanent bans to be treated ‘as if’ they were made under the ACL, they must also become legislative instruments.

A total of nine permanent bans, imposed under the TPA, were in force immediately before 1 January 2011. For details of each instrument see Appendix A.

Consultation

Consultation was undertaken with known suppliers before each ban was made under the TPA. Consultation about the decision to register the bans as legislative instruments was not considered necessary or appropriate, as it does not alter what is banned in any way.

Commencement

These instruments have already commenced in accordance with the TPA but, for the purposes of the LIA, they are taken to have commenced on 1 January 2011 as a consequence of the Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2) 2010.

Disallowance

These instruments are subject to disallowance under Part 5 of the LIA.

Sunsetting

These instruments are subject to sunsetting under Part 6 of the LIA. Unless action is taken to defer or exempt them from sunsetting, they are expected to sunset on 1 April 2021. This estimate takes into account when they are taken to have commenced (see above) and assumes they are registered on or before 31 March 2011.

 APPENDIX A

Detail of bans to which this explanatory statement relates

Banned goods

Reason for ban

History of ban

‘No Holes Tongue Studs’ and similar products

‘No Holes Tongue Studs’ and similar products are tongue studs which attach to the tongue without the need for piercing.  They are small beads worn as jewellery on the human tongue and have a small opening on one side only, which acts to create a vacuum when attached to the tongue.  If one of these tongue studs detaches from the tongue, it is possible to inhale it into the lungs or airways.

Declared banned by the then Minister for Competition Policy and Consumer Affairs on 1 July 2010 by publication in the Gazette.

‘Fire Footbags’ and other similar goods

 

‘Fire Footbags’ and other similar goods are goods manufactured from fire resistant material which are designed to be doused in flammable liquid and ignited.  They are intended to be used for the purpose of amusement by kicking and throwing.  ‘Fire Footbags’ and other similar goods were banned because of the risk that they could ignite other flammable material and/or harm consumers.  The permanent ban on ‘Fire Footbags’ and other similar goods does not apply to goods supplied for use by professional entertainers or for theatrical use where the purchaser can demonstrate such qualifications or intended use.

Declared banned by the then Minister for Competition Policy and Consumer Affairs on 25 January 2010

Toothpaste containing more than 0.25 per cent by weight of diethylene glycol

Diethylene glycol (DEG) is used overseas to replace glycerine in toothpaste. It is a toxic substance and serious illnesses have been reported after its ingestion in pharmaceutical preparations such as cough syrup. Medium to long-term exposure to DEG at significant levels may create unacceptable health risks, particularly to children and to people with kidney and liver disease.

Declared banned by the then Minister for Competition Policy and Consumer Affairs on 12 March 2009 by publication in the Gazette.

Mini jelly cups containing konjac

 

Mini jelly cups containing konjac are small confectionery products often sold in multi-packs.  These mouth-sized jelly cups are no more than 45mm in height and width and if swallowed whole, can lodge in the throat causing choking.  Konjac is a binding food additive that comes from the root of the konnyaku plant; when eaten, it does not dissolve easily.

Declared banned by the then Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer on 21 April 2004 by publication in the Gazette.

Tinted motor vehicle headlight covers

 

A tinted motor vehicle headlight cover is a coloured panel placed in front of a motor vehicle headlight.  Tinted headlight covers that restrict more than fifteen percent of a headlight’s beams are permanently banned.  Tinted headlight covers render a vehicle less visible to pedestrians and other drivers as well as reduce the vehicle driver’s road vision.

Declared banned by the then Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer on 7 May 2003 by publication in the Gazette.

Candles with lead wicks

 

The goods were banned because candles containing more than 0.06 per cent of lead, when burned in an enclosed area for a long time, can release high levels of lead into the atmosphere.  Emissions from candles containing lead are considered hazardous to the health, particularly for unborn babies, small children and pregnant women who can experience a variety of health problems including impaired growth, reproductive disorders and memory loss.

Declared banned by the then Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer on 30 October 2002 by publication in the Gazette.

Gas masks which contain asbestos

Gas masks which contain asbestos were banned because they are hazardous to the user’s health.  The gas masks are fitted with a metal canister containing an asbestos filter.  If the mask is used as a breathing apparatus, the user is exposed to asbestos fibres through the filter. This can lead to the development of mesothelioma, a form of cancer. The ban applies to gas masks for use and collectable gas masks.

Declared banned by the then Minister for Consumer Affairs on 15 September 1993 by publication in the Gazette.

Chewing tobacco and snuffs intended for oral use

Chewing tobacco and snuffs for oral use are absorbed into the user's system through sucking or chewing rather than burning the tobacco, as is the case with cigarettes or cigars.  Chewing tobacco and snuffs for oral use can carry levels of nicotine equivalent to or greater than those found in cigarettes.  Studies have shown a link between the use of smokeless tobacco products and a variety of diseases/infections such as pancreatic cancer, oral cancer, pharyngeal cancer and local lesions in the mouth.

Declared banned by the then Minister of State for Justice and Consumer Affairs on 4 June 1991 by publication in the Gazette.

Glucomannan in tablet form

 

Glucomannan is an appetite suppressant that swells in the stomach to create a feeling of fullness.  Glucomannan in tablet form was permanently banned due to the hazards associated with the tablet swelling prematurely, causing choking while swallowing.  Glucomannan is still widely available in capsule and powder forms, which do not pose a choking hazard to the user. 

Declared banned by the then Attorney– General of the Commonwealth of Australia on 22 December 1986 by publication in the Gazette.

 

Overview

The Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No.2) 2010, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, introduced significant changes to consumer protection laws, primarily through the implementation of a new national consumer law regime known as the Australian Consumer Law (ACL). The primary objective of this amendment was to enhance consumer protection by providing a unified set of consumer rights and obligations across Australia. This legislation also necessitated the transition of existing measures, such as permanent bans on unsafe goods under the Trade Practices Act 1974 (TPA), to align with the new framework. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) prepared an explanatory statement detailing the nine permanent bans on unsafe goods that were in force immediately before the ACL's commencement on 1 January 2011. These bans, which include items like ‘No Holes Tongue Studs’ and tinted motor vehicle headlight covers, were registered as legislative instruments to ensure continuity and enforceability under the new Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (CCA). The transition was designed to maintain the integrity of existing consumer safety measures without altering the banned goods or their restrictions.

Scope and Application

The Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No.2) 2010, along with the Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No.1) 2010, enacts significant changes to the Trade Practices Act 1974 (TPA), which will be renamed the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (CCA) on 1 January 2011. These amendments implement a new national consumer law regime known as the Australian Consumer Law (ACL). The ACL is set to form Schedule 2 to the CCA. Specifically, the legislation addresses the transition of nine permanent bans on unsafe goods from the TPA to the ACL. These bans, which were in force before the ACL's commencement, are now treated as if they were imposed under the new ACL. This transition ensures that the bans remain effective without altering the prohibited goods in any way. The bans apply to various consumer products, such as 'No Holes Tongue Studs', 'Fire Footbags', and toothpaste containing diethylene glycol, among others, due to safety concerns including choking hazards and toxic exposure. The legislation outlines that these bans are subject to disallowance and sunsetting provisions, with the latter set to expire on 1 April 2021 unless further action is taken.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the legislation involve the continuation of nine permanent bans on specific goods that were imposed under the Trade Practices Act 1974 (TPA) before the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) took effect on 1 January 2011. These bans, which were declared unsafe goods by the administering Minister, include items such as 'No Holes Tongue Studs,' 'Fire Footbags,' and toothpaste containing more than 0.25 per cent by weight of diethylene glycol. These bans are treated 'as if' they were imposed under the new Australian Consumer Law (ACL) as outlined in section 114 of the ACL. The ACL allows a Commonwealth Minister to impose a permanent ban on consumer goods if they are deemed to pose a safety risk. The obligations and requirements imposed by the Act on the parties or entities it governs involve the continuation of these bans as legislative instruments. The Minister for Competition Policy and Consumer Affairs, among other officials, declared these goods unsafe and banned them prior to the commencement of the ACL. The legislation ensures that these bans remain in effect and are updated to comply with the new legal framework provided by the ACL. This includes the requirement to publish notices of these bans in the Gazette and to ensure that the goods are not supplied or imported for sale in Australia. The legislation also outlines the consequences for breaches of the bans. Under section 131E of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (CCA), any person who supplies or imports the banned goods for sale, or who advertises such goods, may be subject to civil penalties. The maximum penalty for a corporation is $1.1 million, while for an individual, it is $220,000. Additionally, supplying or importing the banned goods for sale can result in criminal penalties, including fines of up to $66,000 for corporations and $13,200 for individuals. The legislation ensures that these bans continue to protect consumers from unsafe goods by imposing significant financial and legal consequences for non-compliance.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Consumer Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Enforcement Powers
Prohibited Conduct

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.