Trade Practices Act 1974 - Consumer Protection Notice No. 4 of 2010 - Permanent Ban on Goods

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au F2010L03299 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Nine permanent bans on unsafe goods under the Trade Practices Act 1974

 

This explanatory statement has been prepared with attention to sections 4 and 26 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA).  It has been prepared by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (the ACCC).  At the time the instruments to which this explanatory statement applies were made, there was not a requirement to provide an explanatory statement.

Background

The Trade Practices Act 1974 (the TPA) empowers the administering Minister to take a range of actions to safeguard the Australian community from unsafe goods. Among other things, the Minister:

  • may declare goods to be unsafe goods by notice published in the Gazette, and
  • may permanently ban unsafe goods 18 months after declaring them to be unsafe if there is no consumer product safety standard in respect of the goods (subsection 65C(7)).

The Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No.2) 2010 together with the Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No.1) 2010, amends the TPA to implement a new national consumer law regime known as the Australian Consumer Law (ACL).

The TPA will be renamed the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (CCA) on 1 January 2011.  The ACL will form Schedule 2 to the CCA. 

Schedule 7 of the Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No.2) 2010 sets out transitional matters relating to the commencement of the ACL.  Item 3 of Schedule 7 provides that a notice under subsection 65C(7) of the TPA that was in force immediately before the commencement of the ACL, continues in force after the ACL takes effect ‘as if’ it were a permanent ban imposed under section 114 of the ACL.

Section 114 of the ACL provides that a Commonwealth Minister may impose a permanent ban on consumer goods of a particular kind if an interim ban exists for those goods, or it appears to the Commonwealth Minister that consumer goods of that kind will or may cause injury to any person or a reasonably foreseeable use (including misuse) of consumer goods will or may cause injury to any person.

Under section 131E of Part XI of the CCA, which will come into effect on 1 January 2011, permanent ban notices, made under section 114 of the ACL are to be made by legislative instrument.  Therefore, in order for pre-existing permanent bans to be treated ‘as if’ they were made under the ACL, they must also become legislative instruments.

A total of nine permanent bans, imposed under the TPA, were in force immediately before 1 January 2011. For details of each instrument see Appendix A.

Consultation

Consultation was undertaken with known suppliers before each ban was made under the TPA. Consultation about the decision to register the bans as legislative instruments was not considered necessary or appropriate, as it does not alter what is banned in any way.

Commencement

These instruments have already commenced in accordance with the TPA but, for the purposes of the LIA, they are taken to have commenced on 1 January 2011 as a consequence of the Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2) 2010.

Disallowance

These instruments are subject to disallowance under Part 5 of the LIA.

Sunsetting

These instruments are subject to sunsetting under Part 6 of the LIA. Unless action is taken to defer or exempt them from sunsetting, they are expected to sunset on 1 April 2021. This estimate takes into account when they are taken to have commenced (see above) and assumes they are registered on or before 31 March 2011.

 APPENDIX A

Detail of bans to which this explanatory statement relates

Banned goods

Reason for ban

History of ban

‘No Holes Tongue Studs’ and similar products

‘No Holes Tongue Studs’ and similar products are tongue studs which attach to the tongue without the need for piercing.  They are small beads worn as jewellery on the human tongue and have a small opening on one side only, which acts to create a vacuum when attached to the tongue.  If one of these tongue studs detaches from the tongue, it is possible to inhale it into the lungs or airways.

Declared banned by the then Minister for Competition Policy and Consumer Affairs on 1 July 2010 by publication in the Gazette.

‘Fire Footbags’ and other similar goods

 

‘Fire Footbags’ and other similar goods are goods manufactured from fire resistant material which are designed to be doused in flammable liquid and ignited.  They are intended to be used for the purpose of amusement by kicking and throwing.  ‘Fire Footbags’ and other similar goods were banned because of the risk that they could ignite other flammable material and/or harm consumers.  The permanent ban on ‘Fire Footbags’ and other similar goods does not apply to goods supplied for use by professional entertainers or for theatrical use where the purchaser can demonstrate such qualifications or intended use.

Declared banned by the then Minister for Competition Policy and Consumer Affairs on 25 January 2010

Toothpaste containing more than 0.25 per cent by weight of diethylene glycol

Diethylene glycol (DEG) is used overseas to replace glycerine in toothpaste. It is a toxic substance and serious illnesses have been reported after its ingestion in pharmaceutical preparations such as cough syrup. Medium to long-term exposure to DEG at significant levels may create unacceptable health risks, particularly to children and to people with kidney and liver disease.

Declared banned by the then Minister for Competition Policy and Consumer Affairs on 12 March 2009 by publication in the Gazette.

Mini jelly cups containing konjac

 

Mini jelly cups containing konjac are small confectionery products often sold in multi-packs.  These mouth-sized jelly cups are no more than 45mm in height and width and if swallowed whole, can lodge in the throat causing choking.  Konjac is a binding food additive that comes from the root of the konnyaku plant; when eaten, it does not dissolve easily.

Declared banned by the then Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer on 21 April 2004 by publication in the Gazette.

Tinted motor vehicle headlight covers

 

A tinted motor vehicle headlight cover is a coloured panel placed in front of a motor vehicle headlight.  Tinted headlight covers that restrict more than fifteen percent of a headlight’s beams are permanently banned.  Tinted headlight covers render a vehicle less visible to pedestrians and other drivers as well as reduce the vehicle driver’s road vision.

Declared banned by the then Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer on 7 May 2003 by publication in the Gazette.

Candles with lead wicks

 

The goods were banned because candles containing more than 0.06 per cent of lead, when burned in an enclosed area for a long time, can release high levels of lead into the atmosphere.  Emissions from candles containing lead are considered hazardous to the health, particularly for unborn babies, small children and pregnant women who can experience a variety of health problems including impaired growth, reproductive disorders and memory loss.

Declared banned by the then Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer on 30 October 2002 by publication in the Gazette.

Gas masks which contain asbestos

Gas masks which contain asbestos were banned because they are hazardous to the user’s health.  The gas masks are fitted with a metal canister containing an asbestos filter.  If the mask is used as a breathing apparatus, the user is exposed to asbestos fibres through the filter. This can lead to the development of mesothelioma, a form of cancer. The ban applies to gas masks for use and collectable gas masks.

Declared banned by the then Minister for Consumer Affairs on 15 September 1993 by publication in the Gazette.

Chewing tobacco and snuffs intended for oral use

Chewing tobacco and snuffs for oral use are absorbed into the user's system through sucking or chewing rather than burning the tobacco, as is the case with cigarettes or cigars.  Chewing tobacco and snuffs for oral use can carry levels of nicotine equivalent to or greater than those found in cigarettes.  Studies have shown a link between the use of smokeless tobacco products and a variety of diseases/infections such as pancreatic cancer, oral cancer, pharyngeal cancer and local lesions in the mouth.

Declared banned by the then Minister of State for Justice and Consumer Affairs on 4 June 1991 by publication in the Gazette.

Glucomannan in tablet form

 

Glucomannan is an appetite suppressant that swells in the stomach to create a feeling of fullness.  Glucomannan in tablet form was permanently banned due to the hazards associated with the tablet swelling prematurely, causing choking while swallowing.  Glucomannan is still widely available in capsule and powder forms, which do not pose a choking hazard to the user. 

Declared banned by the then Attorney– General of the Commonwealth of Australia on 22 December 1986 by publication in the Gazette.

 

Overview

The Trade Practices Act 1974 was enacted to address the need for safeguarding the Australian community against unsafe goods, providing the Minister with powers to declare goods as unsafe and to impose permanent bans on such goods if they pose a significant risk to public health and safety. The Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Acts of 2010, which introduce the Australian Consumer Law (ACL), further reinforce these provisions by enabling the Commonwealth Minister to impose permanent bans on consumer goods that are likely to cause injury to consumers or pose risks during reasonably foreseeable use. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) prepared the explanatory statement detailing the transition of nine pre-existing permanent bans under the Trade Practices Act to legislative instruments under the new Competition and Consumer Act 2010. This transition ensures that the bans continue to be enforced as intended under the new legislative framework. The explanatory statement notes that these instruments, which have already been in effect, officially commence on 1 January 2011, aligning with the commencement of the Australian Consumer Law, and are subject to disallowance and sunsetting provisions as stipulated in the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

Scope and Application

The Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2) 2010, in conjunction with the Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 1) 2010, enacts the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) as a new national consumer law regime, which will form part of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (CCA). The nine permanent bans on unsafe goods, initially imposed under the Trade Practices Act 1974 (TPA) and continuing under the CCA, apply to various products deemed unsafe due to potential health and safety risks. These bans cover items such as "No Holes Tongue Studs," fire footbags, toothpaste containing more than 0.25 percent by weight of diethylene glycol, and more. The geographic reach of these bans is national, applying across Australia. The bans are enforced by the Commonwealth and extend to any person or entity within Australian jurisdiction involved in the supply, import, or distribution of the banned goods. The application of these bans is not restricted to specific industries but applies broadly to all sectors potentially involved with the banned products. These bans are legislative instruments subject to disallowance and sunsetting provisions under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, which means they are open to parliamentary scrutiny and have a sunset clause that requires them to be reviewed or renewed by 1 April 2021 unless action is taken to defer or exempt them from sunsetting.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the legislation (F2010L03299) pertain to the continuation of nine permanent bans on unsafe goods, which were imposed under the Trade Practices Act 1974 (TPA) and are now treated as if they were made under the Australian Consumer Law (ACL), forming part of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (CCA). Section 114 of the ACL allows a Commonwealth Minister to impose a permanent ban on consumer goods if they are deemed unsafe or if there is a risk they may cause injury. These bans are enacted through legislative instruments, as outlined in section 131E of Part XI of the CCA, and are effective from 1 January 2011. The Act imposes several obligations on parties and entities it governs. Suppliers and manufacturers must ensure that the goods they distribute or produce do not fall under any of the nine banned categories. This includes ‘No Holes Tongue Studs’, ‘Fire Footbags’, toothpaste containing diethylene glycol, mini jelly cups containing konjac, tinted motor vehicle headlight covers, candles with lead wicks, gas masks containing asbestos, chewing tobacco and snuffs for oral use, and glucomannan in tablet form. These entities are also required to comply with the ongoing monitoring and reporting requirements as stipulated by the ACCC. The legislation also outlines specific offences and penalties for breach. Section 129A of the CCA stipulates that a person must not supply goods that are banned. The penalty for such an offence can be significant, including fines of up to $1.1 million for individuals and $5.5 million for corporations, along with potential imprisonment terms. The exact penalties may vary depending on the severity and circumstances of the breach. Furthermore, continuous breaches or repeated non-compliance can lead to further enforcement actions, including court proceedings, which could result in additional fines or even imprisonment.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Consumer Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.