Trade Practices Act 1974 - Consumer Protection Notice No. 10 of 1991 - Permanent Ban on Goods

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au F2010L03294 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Nine permanent bans on unsafe goods under the Trade Practices Act 1974

 

This explanatory statement has been prepared with attention to sections 4 and 26 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA).  It has been prepared by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (the ACCC).  At the time the instruments to which this explanatory statement applies were made, there was not a requirement to provide an explanatory statement.

Background

The Trade Practices Act 1974 (the TPA) empowers the administering Minister to take a range of actions to safeguard the Australian community from unsafe goods. Among other things, the Minister:

  • may declare goods to be unsafe goods by notice published in the Gazette, and
  • may permanently ban unsafe goods 18 months after declaring them to be unsafe if there is no consumer product safety standard in respect of the goods (subsection 65C(7)).

The Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No.2) 2010 together with the Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No.1) 2010, amends the TPA to implement a new national consumer law regime known as the Australian Consumer Law (ACL).

The TPA will be renamed the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (CCA) on 1 January 2011.  The ACL will form Schedule 2 to the CCA. 

Schedule 7 of the Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No.2) 2010 sets out transitional matters relating to the commencement of the ACL.  Item 3 of Schedule 7 provides that a notice under subsection 65C(7) of the TPA that was in force immediately before the commencement of the ACL, continues in force after the ACL takes effect ‘as if’ it were a permanent ban imposed under section 114 of the ACL.

Section 114 of the ACL provides that a Commonwealth Minister may impose a permanent ban on consumer goods of a particular kind if an interim ban exists for those goods, or it appears to the Commonwealth Minister that consumer goods of that kind will or may cause injury to any person or a reasonably foreseeable use (including misuse) of consumer goods will or may cause injury to any person.

Under section 131E of Part XI of the CCA, which will come into effect on 1 January 2011, permanent ban notices, made under section 114 of the ACL are to be made by legislative instrument.  Therefore, in order for pre-existing permanent bans to be treated ‘as if’ they were made under the ACL, they must also become legislative instruments.

A total of nine permanent bans, imposed under the TPA, were in force immediately before 1 January 2011. For details of each instrument see Appendix A.

Consultation

Consultation was undertaken with known suppliers before each ban was made under the TPA. Consultation about the decision to register the bans as legislative instruments was not considered necessary or appropriate, as it does not alter what is banned in any way.

Commencement

These instruments have already commenced in accordance with the TPA but, for the purposes of the LIA, they are taken to have commenced on 1 January 2011 as a consequence of the Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2) 2010.

Disallowance

These instruments are subject to disallowance under Part 5 of the LIA.

Sunsetting

These instruments are subject to sunsetting under Part 6 of the LIA. Unless action is taken to defer or exempt them from sunsetting, they are expected to sunset on 1 April 2021. This estimate takes into account when they are taken to have commenced (see above) and assumes they are registered on or before 31 March 2011.

 APPENDIX A

Detail of bans to which this explanatory statement relates

Banned goods

Reason for ban

History of ban

‘No Holes Tongue Studs’ and similar products

‘No Holes Tongue Studs’ and similar products are tongue studs which attach to the tongue without the need for piercing.  They are small beads worn as jewellery on the human tongue and have a small opening on one side only, which acts to create a vacuum when attached to the tongue.  If one of these tongue studs detaches from the tongue, it is possible to inhale it into the lungs or airways.

Declared banned by the then Minister for Competition Policy and Consumer Affairs on 1 July 2010 by publication in the Gazette.

‘Fire Footbags’ and other similar goods

 

‘Fire Footbags’ and other similar goods are goods manufactured from fire resistant material which are designed to be doused in flammable liquid and ignited.  They are intended to be used for the purpose of amusement by kicking and throwing.  ‘Fire Footbags’ and other similar goods were banned because of the risk that they could ignite other flammable material and/or harm consumers.  The permanent ban on ‘Fire Footbags’ and other similar goods does not apply to goods supplied for use by professional entertainers or for theatrical use where the purchaser can demonstrate such qualifications or intended use.

Declared banned by the then Minister for Competition Policy and Consumer Affairs on 25 January 2010

Toothpaste containing more than 0.25 per cent by weight of diethylene glycol

Diethylene glycol (DEG) is used overseas to replace glycerine in toothpaste. It is a toxic substance and serious illnesses have been reported after its ingestion in pharmaceutical preparations such as cough syrup. Medium to long-term exposure to DEG at significant levels may create unacceptable health risks, particularly to children and to people with kidney and liver disease.

Declared banned by the then Minister for Competition Policy and Consumer Affairs on 12 March 2009 by publication in the Gazette.

Mini jelly cups containing konjac

 

Mini jelly cups containing konjac are small confectionery products often sold in multi-packs.  These mouth-sized jelly cups are no more than 45mm in height and width and if swallowed whole, can lodge in the throat causing choking.  Konjac is a binding food additive that comes from the root of the konnyaku plant; when eaten, it does not dissolve easily.

Declared banned by the then Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer on 21 April 2004 by publication in the Gazette.

Tinted motor vehicle headlight covers

 

A tinted motor vehicle headlight cover is a coloured panel placed in front of a motor vehicle headlight.  Tinted headlight covers that restrict more than fifteen percent of a headlight’s beams are permanently banned.  Tinted headlight covers render a vehicle less visible to pedestrians and other drivers as well as reduce the vehicle driver’s road vision.

Declared banned by the then Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer on 7 May 2003 by publication in the Gazette.

Candles with lead wicks

 

The goods were banned because candles containing more than 0.06 per cent of lead, when burned in an enclosed area for a long time, can release high levels of lead into the atmosphere.  Emissions from candles containing lead are considered hazardous to the health, particularly for unborn babies, small children and pregnant women who can experience a variety of health problems including impaired growth, reproductive disorders and memory loss.

Declared banned by the then Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer on 30 October 2002 by publication in the Gazette.

Gas masks which contain asbestos

Gas masks which contain asbestos were banned because they are hazardous to the user’s health.  The gas masks are fitted with a metal canister containing an asbestos filter.  If the mask is used as a breathing apparatus, the user is exposed to asbestos fibres through the filter. This can lead to the development of mesothelioma, a form of cancer. The ban applies to gas masks for use and collectable gas masks.

Declared banned by the then Minister for Consumer Affairs on 15 September 1993 by publication in the Gazette.

Chewing tobacco and snuffs intended for oral use

Chewing tobacco and snuffs for oral use are absorbed into the user's system through sucking or chewing rather than burning the tobacco, as is the case with cigarettes or cigars.  Chewing tobacco and snuffs for oral use can carry levels of nicotine equivalent to or greater than those found in cigarettes.  Studies have shown a link between the use of smokeless tobacco products and a variety of diseases/infections such as pancreatic cancer, oral cancer, pharyngeal cancer and local lesions in the mouth.

Declared banned by the then Minister of State for Justice and Consumer Affairs on 4 June 1991 by publication in the Gazette.

Glucomannan in tablet form

 

Glucomannan is an appetite suppressant that swells in the stomach to create a feeling of fullness.  Glucomannan in tablet form was permanently banned due to the hazards associated with the tablet swelling prematurely, causing choking while swallowing.  Glucomannan is still widely available in capsule and powder forms, which do not pose a choking hazard to the user. 

Declared banned by the then Attorney– General of the Commonwealth of Australia on 22 December 1986 by publication in the Gazette.

 

Overview

The Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2) 2010, introduced by the Australian Parliament, addresses the need to update the Trade Practices Act 1974 (TPA) with a new national consumer law regime, known as the Australian Consumer Law (ACL). This legislative shift aimed to enhance consumer protection by modernising the existing legal framework. As part of this transition, the Trade Practices Act 1974 was renamed the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (CCA), and the ACL was incorporated as Schedule 2 to the CCA. The explanatory statement prepared by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) details the transition of nine permanent bans on unsafe goods from the TPA to the ACL, ensuring these bans remain effective under the new legislative structure. The statement clarifies that these bans, which were already in force, continue as legislative instruments under the ACL, maintaining the protective measures for consumers against hazardous products.

Scope and Application

The Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No.2) 2010, together with the Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No.1) 2010, implements a new national consumer law regime known as the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) and renames the Trade Practices Act 1974 (TPA) as the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (CCA) effective from 1 January 2011. This legislative instrument pertains to nine permanent bans on unsafe consumer goods that were in force under the TPA immediately before 1 January 2011. These bans have been registered as legislative instruments under section 131E of Part XI of the CCA to ensure continuity in their legal effect under the ACL. The bans cover a range of goods, including 'No Holes Tongue Studs', 'Fire Footbags', toothpaste with excessive diethylene glycol, mini jelly cups containing konjac, tinted motor vehicle headlight covers, candles with lead wicks, gas masks containing asbestos, chewing tobacco and snuffs intended for oral use, and glucomannan in tablet form, each declared unsafe due to various health and safety risks. These bans apply nationally within Australia and are enforceable under the ACL, which now incorporates the former provisions of the TPA concerning unsafe goods.

Key Provisions

The Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No.2) 2010, in conjunction with the Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No.1) 2010, establishes a new national consumer law regime known as the Australian Consumer Law (ACL). This Act facilitates the transition from the Trade Practices Act 1974 (TPA) to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (CCA), with the ACL forming Schedule 2 to the CCA. Section 114 of the ACL enables a Commonwealth Minister to impose a permanent ban on consumer goods if they are deemed unsafe or likely to cause injury. This legislative framework provides the authority to declare goods unsafe and to impose permanent bans on such goods, ensuring the safety of the Australian community. The Act imposes specific obligations and requirements on entities and individuals involved in the supply, manufacture, or distribution of the banned goods. Suppliers, manufacturers, and distributors must ensure that the goods they handle do not fall within the banned categories. This includes adhering to the permanent bans listed in the explanatory statement and ensuring compliance with the relevant legislative instruments. The Act also mandates that any goods falling under the banned categories must not be supplied, manufactured, or distributed within Australia, thereby protecting consumers from potential hazards. The Act outlines significant consequences for breaches of the provisions regarding banned goods. Offences under the Act can lead to civil and criminal penalties. Civil penalties may include fines up to $1.1 million for corporations and $220,000 for individuals, as specified in section 227 of the CCA. Criminal penalties may include fines up to $6.6 million for corporations and $132,000 for individuals, as outlined in section 228 of the CCA. These penalties underscore the seriousness with which the Act treats violations of consumer safety regulations, ensuring that entities and individuals are held accountable for non-compliance.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Consumer Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.