EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
STATUTORY RULES 1982 NO. 79
Issued by the Authority of the Minister for Science and Technology
The purpose of the attached Regulations made under the Trade Marks Act 1955 (the Act) is to remove from the Trade Marks Regulations provisions rendered superfluous by virtue of the commencement of the Trade Marks Amendment Act 1981 and to make a formal amendment to the Third Schedule to the Trade Marks Regulations.
The Trade Marks Amendment Act 1981 (No. 43 of 1981), which came into operation on 22 June 1981, amended sub-section 103 (4) of the Act. Until the amendment, section 103 (4) of the Act provided that the Comptroller-General of Customs, when requested to seize imported goods under section 103 of the Act, may require the giving of security in accordance with the regulations. The provisions of regulation 64 of the Trade Marks Regulations relate to the giving of such security.
The provisions for the giving of security under section 103 of the Act are now included in amended sub-section 103 (4) and the provisions of regulation 64 are therefore superfluous. The attached regulation 1 repeals the superfluous provisions of regulation 64. The attached regulation 3 provides a saving clause to enable goods imported prior to the commencement of the Trade Marks Amendment Act 1981 to be covered by the provisions of existing regulation 64.
Article 2 of the Third Schedule to the Trade Marks Regulations contains a reference to the International Standards Organisation. The correct title of this body is the International Organization for Standardization. The attached regulation 2 corrects the reference to the title of this organisation.
Overview
The Trade Marks Amendment Act 1981, enacted to amend the Trade Marks Act 1955, was introduced to address the redundancy and inaccuracies in the Trade Marks Regulations caused by the previous amendments. The problem it sought to resolve was the existence of superfluous provisions in the Trade Marks Regulations, specifically concerning the security requirements under section 103 of the Act, which were now included in the amended sub-section 103(4). Additionally, the Act aimed to correct a typographical error in the Third Schedule of the Trade Marks Regulations, rectifying the incorrect reference to the International Standards Organisation as the International Organization for Standardization. The Regulations were enacted by the authority of the Minister for Science and Technology, ensuring they aligned with the policy objectives of maintaining accurate and efficient legal frameworks for trade mark regulation in Australia.
Scope and Application
The Trade Marks Amendment Act 1981, as reflected in the Statutory Rules 1982 No. 79, aims to streamline and update the Trade Marks Regulations, ensuring they remain consistent with the changes introduced by the Trade Marks Amendment Act 1981. These regulations apply to all persons and entities engaged in activities related to the registration, protection, and enforcement of trademarks in Australia, particularly those involved in the importation of goods. The jurisdictional scope of these regulations is national, as they pertain to the administration and oversight of trademarks under the Commonwealth of Australia. Notably, these regulations exclude matters already addressed within the amended sub-section 103 (4) of the Trade Marks Act 1955, such as the provisions for the giving of security for seized imported goods. Subordinate instruments may further define specific details and operational aspects of these regulations, thereby extending or restricting their application where necessary.
Key Provisions
The key operative sections of the Statutory Rules 1982 No. 79, issued under the Trade Marks Act 1955, primarily focus on amending the Trade Marks Regulations to reflect changes brought about by the Trade Marks Amendment Act 1981. Regulation 1 repeals the provisions of regulation 64, which previously dealt with the giving of security when the Comptroller-General of Customs was requested to seize imported goods under section 103 of the Act (s. 103(4)). This repeal is necessary because the amendment to the Act subsumed the previous regulatory requirements into the Act itself, rendering regulation 64 redundant. Regulation 3 includes a saving clause, ensuring that any goods imported before the Trade Marks Amendment Act 1981 came into effect can still be governed by the existing regulation 64. Furthermore, regulation 2 corrects a typographical error in the Third Schedule of the Trade Marks Regulations, changing the reference from "International Standards Organisation" to the correct title, "International Organization for Standardization".
The obligations imposed by these regulations primarily concern the updating of the Trade Marks Regulations to maintain consistency with the Trade Marks Amendment Act 1981. Parties governed by the Trade Marks Act, such as the Comptroller-General of Customs and importers, must now adhere to the updated provisions as set out in the amended section 103(4) of the Act. Specifically, any request for the seizure of imported goods now directly references the Act without needing to consult superseded regulatory provisions. Additionally, importers and other stakeholders must ensure they are aware of and compliant with the corrected reference to the International Organization for Standardization in the Third Schedule, ensuring any referenced standards or practices are correctly identified and applied.
Breaches of the Trade Marks Regulations, as updated by these Statutory Rules, could lead to various consequences. While the Statutory Rules themselves do not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties, the overarching Trade Marks Act 1955 provides a framework for enforcement. Offences under the Trade Marks Act could include unauthorized use of a registered trademark, which might result in civil penalties such as damages or injunctions, and potentially criminal penalties if the infringement is deemed to be of a serious nature. The maximum penalties for criminal offences under the Trade Marks Act can include substantial fines and imprisonment, depending on the severity and intent of the infringement. Compliance with these regulations is thus critical to avoid both civil and criminal repercussions.