EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Ministerial Direction No.2 of 2013
Issued by authority of the Minister for Education
Authority
Under subsection 155(1) of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the Act) the Minister may give a direction, by legislative instrument, to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Tertiary Education and Quality Standards Agency (TEQSA) about the performance of her functions.
In accordance with sections 44 and 54 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, the Ministerial Direction No. 2 of 2013 is not subject to disallowance or sunsetting.
Purpose and operation
The purpose of the instrument is to direct TEQSA’s CEO to consult and seek advice on a range of matters and to detail deregulatory initiatives undertaken to improve the efficiency and timeliness of TEQSA’s core compliance activities.
Consultation
Extensive consultation with the sector was undertaken by Professor Kwong Lee Dow AO and Professor Valerie Braithwaite in their independent Review of Higher Education Regulation. This legislative instrument is part of the Government’s response to this Report.
Commencement
The legislative instrument will commence on the day after registration on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.
Overview
The Ministerial Direction No. 2 of 2013, issued under the authority of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011, was enacted to guide the Chief Executive Officer of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA) in the execution of their functions. This legislative instrument was introduced to facilitate consultation and advice-seeking processes, as well as to implement deregulatory measures aimed at enhancing the efficiency and timeliness of TEQSA's core compliance activities. The policy objective, as outlined in the explanatory statement, is to respond to the recommendations of the independent Review of Higher Education Regulation, led by Professor Kwong Lee Dow AO and Professor Valerie Braithwaite. The Direction became effective on the day following its registration on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments and is not subject to disallowance or sunsetting as per sections 44 and 54 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Scope and Application
The Ministerial Direction No. 2 of 2013 applies to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA), which is the body responsible for regulating the higher education sector in Australia. The direction mandates the CEO to consult and seek advice on various regulatory matters, as well as to implement deregulatory initiatives designed to enhance the efficiency and timeliness of TEQSA's core compliance activities. This legislation is grounded in the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011, reflecting its Commonwealth jurisdiction. There are no specific exclusions or thresholds outlined in the instrument, but it is part of the broader governmental response to the independent Review of Higher Education Regulation, which suggests a wide-ranging application intended to streamline and improve the regulatory framework for higher education institutions in Australia. The Ministerial Direction extends its reach through subordinate instruments that may further detail the consultation and advice processes, but it is explicitly stated that this instrument itself is not subject to disallowance or sunsetting under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Key Provisions
Ministerial Direction No. 2 of 2013, issued under the authority of the Minister for Education, outlines specific directives to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA). According to section 155(1) of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011, the Minister has the power to issue such a direction by legislative instrument to the CEO of TEQSA regarding the performance of her functions. The directive is also governed by sections 44 and 54 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, which stipulate that it is not subject to disallowance or sunsetting. The primary purpose of this instrument, as stated in the explanatory statement, is to instruct the CEO of TEQSA to engage in consultation and seek advice on various matters, while also detailing deregulatory initiatives aimed at enhancing the efficiency and timeliness of TEQSA's core compliance activities. This legislative instrument is a direct response to the recommendations made in the independent Review of Higher Education Regulation conducted by Professor Kwong Lee Dow AO and Professor Valerie Braithwaite.
The Ministerial Direction No. 2 of 2013 imposes several obligations on the CEO of TEQSA. Firstly, it mandates the CEO to undertake extensive consultation and seek advice from relevant stakeholders on a range of issues pertinent to higher education regulation. This includes consulting with industry experts, educational institutions, and other pertinent bodies to gather insights and recommendations. Secondly, the directive outlines specific deregulatory initiatives that the CEO must implement to improve the efficiency and timeliness of TEQSA’s core compliance activities. This may involve streamlining processes, reducing bureaucratic hurdles, and enhancing the overall effectiveness of regulatory oversight. The CEO is expected to ensure that these initiatives are effectively integrated into TEQSA's operations, thereby fostering a more responsive and efficient regulatory environment.
Breaches of the obligations outlined in Ministerial Direction No. 2 of 2013 may have significant legal consequences. While the directive itself does not explicitly detail specific offences, penalties, or consequences for non-compliance, the overarching legislation, the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011, provides a framework for potential enforcement actions. Non-compliance with ministerial directions can be viewed as a failure to perform statutory duties, which may lead to disciplinary measures against the CEO or other relevant officials. In severe cases, this could result in legal action, including fines or other penalties as prescribed by relevant laws. Additionally, the failure to adhere to the directive's requirements could undermine the credibility and effectiveness of TEQSA, potentially leading to broader regulatory and compliance challenges.