STATUTORY RULES.
1928. No. 97.
REGULATION UNDER THE POST AND TELEGRAPH ACT 1901-1923.
I, THE DEPUTY OF THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the undermentioned amended Regulation under the Post and Telegraph Act 1901-1923, to come into operation forthwith.
Dated this sixth day of September, 1928.
W. P. CULLEN
Deputy of the Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
W. G. GIBSON
Postmaster-General.
Amendment of the Telegraph Regulations.
(Statutory Rules 1927, No. 142 as amended to this date.)
Regulation 70 of the Telegraph Regulations is amended by omitting the words “presided over by a Judge”.
By Authority: H. J. Green, Government Printer, Canberra.
1939.—Price 3d.
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1928, No. 97, represents an amendment to the Telegraph Regulations under the Post and Telegraph Act 1901-1923. Enacted by the Deputy of the Governor-General with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, these regulations aim to streamline administrative processes and enhance efficiency within the postal and telegraphic services. The objective of this particular amendment, which omits the requirement for a judge to preside over certain proceedings, is to reduce bureaucratic barriers and expedite decision-making related to telegraphic services. The regulation was published by the authority of H. J. Green, the Government Printer in Canberra, and came into operation immediately upon enactment.
Scope and Application
The amended Regulation under the Post and Telegraph Act 1901-1923 pertains to the alterations of the Telegraph Regulations, specifically focusing on the modification of Regulation 70. This regulation, which originally required proceedings to be presided over by a judge, has been amended by removing these words, thereby altering the procedural requirements for certain post and telegraph activities within the Commonwealth of Australia. This change impacts any persons or entities involved in the conduct or transactions related to telegraph services as defined under the Post and Telegraph Act. The geographic scope of the regulation is confined to the Commonwealth, affecting all relevant activities and services across Australia. There are no stated exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds explicitly mentioned in this amendment. The regulatory framework may be further extended or restricted through additional subordinate instruments, which could provide more detailed operational guidelines or specific exceptions not covered in the main text of this statutory rule.
Key Provisions
The amended Regulation under the Post and Telegraph Act 1901-1923, specifically Regulation 70, is notable for its alteration regarding the presiding authority over certain proceedings. Under the original Regulation 70, these proceedings were required to be "presided over by a Judge." However, this requirement has been omitted, meaning that such proceedings can now occur without the necessity of judicial oversight. This change might reflect an intention to streamline administrative or regulatory processes by allowing them to be conducted under less formal conditions, possibly to enhance efficiency or reduce costs.
The Act imposes several obligations on the entities it governs, primarily related to the operation of postal and telegraph services within Australia. These obligations include adherence to the new regulatory framework that no longer necessitates judicial presence in specific proceedings. This amendment suggests a shift towards more flexible administrative practices, which could involve internal oversight or other forms of accountability mechanisms within the governing bodies responsible for postal and telegraph services.
In terms of consequences for breach, the legislation does not explicitly detail offences, penalties, or consequences for non-compliance with the amended Regulation. However, under the overarching Post and Telegraph Act 1901-1923, general provisions for offences and penalties apply. For instance, contraventions of regulations under this Act could lead to fines or other sanctions as prescribed by the law. The specific penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, and could potentially include substantial fines or other regulatory actions. It is also worth noting that while the amended Regulation itself does not specify maximum penalties, the broader legislative context provides a framework within which penalties for non-compliance are determined.