Telecommunications (Submarine Cable Permit - Application Charge) Determination 2007

Administered by Department of Communications and the Arts

Legislation au F2007L00368 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Telecommunications (Submarine Cable Permit – Application Charge) Determination 2007

Australian Communications and Media Authority Act 2005

 

Legislative Provisions

 

The Telecommunications (Submarine Cable Permit – Application Charge) Determination 2007 (the Determination) has been made to revoke and replace the Telecommunications (Submarine Cable Permit – Application Charge) Determination 2006 (No.2). The Determination provides updated charges arising from a review of ACMA’s cost recovery fees and charges.

Subsection 60(1) of the Australian Communications and Media Authority Act 2005 provides that ACMA may, by written instrument, make determinations fixing charges for services provided by ACMA and in relation to any matter in which expenses are incurred by ACMA under this Act and other Acts including the Telecommunications Act 1997, the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and the Broadcasting Services Act 1992.  The charges must not be such as to amount to taxation.

 

This determination is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (as stated in subsection 136C (7) of the Act).

Background

 

ACMA reviewed its fees and charges as part of a scheduled five-yearly review of its cost recovery arrangements.  ACMA reviewed its existing fees and charges against cost recovery principles outlined in the Australian Government’s Cost Recovery Guidelines.

 

The review resulted in updates to a range of existing charges, including charges for services provided by ACMA under the Telecommunications Act 1997. 

This determination specifies the charges payable by telecommunications carriers to ACMA to recover the expenses incurred by ACMA for issuing permits for carriers to install one or more submarine cables in protection zones and non-protection zones.

The determination is named the Telecommunications (Submarine Cable Permit – Application Charge) Determination 2007.

Regulation Impact

 

ACMA has obtained the advice of the Office of Best Practice Regulation (formerly the Office of Regulation Review) that a Regulation Impact Statement is not required for the Determination as the proposal does not have a significant impact on business or the economy.  A Cost Recovery Impact Statement has been prepared which outlines the basis for calculating the charges payable.

Consultation

 

A consultation paper about the review of ACMA’s existing cost recovery fees and charges was released for public comment on 22 December 2006.  The consultation paper proposed the change to the carrier licence application charge in this determination.  The consultation paper was also published on ACMA’s website and was provided directly to telecommunications carriers, carriage service providers and to a range of industry bodies and associations. 

ACMA received five submissions on the proposed arrangements.

Commencement of Determination

The Determination commences on 1 May 2007.


Details of the determination

Section 1 – Name of Determination

Section 1 provides for the citation of the Determination as the Telecommunications (Submarine Cable Permit – Application Charge) Determination 2007.

 

Section 2 – Commencement

Section 2 provides that the Determination commences on 1 May 2007.

 

Section 3 – Revocation

Section 3 revokes the Determination known as the Telecommunications (Submarine Cable Permit – Application Charge) Determination 2006 (No.2).

 

Section 4 – Interpretation

Section 4 defines some of the key terms in the determination and specifies that terms used in the Determination have the same meaning as the Telecommunications Act 1997.

 

Section 5 – Purpose of this Determination

Section 5 states the purpose of this Determination, which is to fix charges for services provided by ACMA in relation to ACMA’s expenses in connection with dealing with an application for a protection zone installation permit or a non-protection zone installation permit and as do not relate to a public inquiry held in relation to that application.

 

Section 6 - Charges

Section 6 specifies the charges to be imposed on an application in relation to certain permits to install submarine cables by reference to Column 3, Column 4 and item 4 of Schedule 1.

Section 7 - By whom and when is the charge payable

Section 7 specifies when and by whom a charge is payable.

 

Section 8 - Refund

Section 8 specifies that if ACMA’s expenditure on external consultants in connection with a non-protection zone installation is less than the amount specified in item 4 of Schedule 1, ACMA must refund the amount by which the expenditure is less.

 


Schedule 1 Charges Payable

Item [1] Protection zone installation permit charge

Item [1] details the application charge for the consideration and processing of an application to install a submarine cable in a protection zone.

 

Item [2] Protection zone installation permit – permit extension charge

Item [2] details the application charge for the consideration and processing of an application to extend a protection zone installation permit.

 

Item [3] Non-protection zone installation permit charge

Item [3] details the application charge for the consideration and processing of an application to install a submarine cable in Australian waters that are not a protection zone and not the coastal waters of a State or Territory, and which is not an application for a linked non-protection zone installation permit, other than for the use of external consultants.

 

Item [4] Non-protection zone installation permit expert consultancy charge

Item [4] details the charge for the use by ACMA of external consultants to assist in considering the application mentioned in item [3].

 

Item [5] Non-protection zone installation permit – permit extension charge

Item [5] details the application charge for the consideration and processing of an application to extend a non-protection zone installation permit.

 

Item [6] Linked non-protection zone installation permit charge

Item [6] details the application charge for the consideration and processing of an application to for a linked non-protection zone installation permit, other than for the use of external consultants.

 

Overview

The Telecommunications (Submarine Cable Permit – Application Charge) Determination 2007, made under the Australian Communications and Media Authority Act 2005, was enacted to update and replace the 2006 version, addressing the need for revised charges following a review of the ACMA’s cost recovery fees. This Determination, established by the Australian Parliament, aims to fix charges for services provided by the ACMA, ensuring they are in line with cost recovery principles and do not amount to taxation. The update addresses the expenses incurred by the ACMA for issuing permits related to submarine cable installations in both protection and non-protection zones. This legislative instrument is designed to ensure ACMA can recover its costs effectively while maintaining fairness and transparency in its fee structure.

Scope and Application

The Telecommunications (Submarine Cable Permit – Application Charge) Determination 2007 applies to telecommunications carriers who wish to install submarine cables in Australian waters, specifically within protection zones or non-protection zones. The charges are established to recover expenses incurred by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) in processing these permit applications, as permitted under the Australian Communications and Media Authority Act 2005. The geographic reach of this Determination is national, as it applies across Australia. The Determination does not extend or restrict its application through subordinate instruments but is a standalone legislative instrument. Notably, the charges outlined are designed to align with the cost recovery principles of the Australian Government and are not intended to amount to taxation. The Determination came into effect on 1 May 2007, replacing the previous Determination from 2006, and it includes provisions for refunds if ACMA's expenditure on external consultants for non-protection zone installations is less than the specified amount.

Key Provisions

The Telecommunications (Submarine Cable Permit – Application Charge) Determination 2007 (section 2) commences on 1 May 2007, replacing the Telecommunications (Submarine Cable Permit – Application Charge) Determination 2006 (No.2) (section 3). This Determination, as per section 6, fixes the charges for services provided by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) in relation to expenses incurred for issuing permits for submarine cable installations. These charges are itemised in Schedule 1, which includes various charges such as the protection zone installation permit charge (item 1), the non-protection zone installation permit charge (item 3), and the expert consultancy charge for non-protection zone installations (item 4). The charges for permit extensions are also specified, including charges for both protection zone and non-protection zone permits (items 2 and 5 respectively). Under this Determination, telecommunications carriers must adhere to the stipulated charges when applying for permits to install submarine cables in specified zones (section 6). The charges are payable as detailed in section 7, which outlines the timing and parties responsible for making the payments. For instance, when an application is submitted for a non-protection zone installation permit, the carrier must ensure the appropriate charge, as specified in Schedule 1, is paid. Additionally, if ACMA's expenditure on external consultants for a non-protection zone installation is less than the amount specified in item 4 of Schedule 1, ACMA must refund the difference (section 8). Breach of the obligations imposed by this Determination may not inherently result in criminal or civil penalties as specified within the text. However, non-compliance with the stipulated charges and payment obligations could lead to administrative consequences, such as delays in the processing of permit applications. It is important for telecommunications carriers to accurately calculate and remit the specified charges to avoid any potential disruptions in their operations related to submarine cable installations.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Regulatory & Administrative Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Commencement Provisions
Charges & Fees

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.