Telecommunications Regulations (Amendment)

Legislation au C2004L06250 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

STATUTORY RULE 1985 NO. 295 ISSUED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE MINISTER FOR COMMUNICATIONS

Section 112 of the Telecommunications Act 1975 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations, not inconsistent with the Act, prescribing all matters which by that Act are required or permitted to be prescribed by the regulations, or which are necessary or convenient to be prescribed by the regulations for carrying out or giving effect to that Act.

Section 40 of the Act requires that the appointment of an officer shall be on probation for a period of 6 months from the date the officer commences duty, unless the Commission otherwise directs in a particular case. Section 40(4)(b) allows the Commission to terminate the employment of such a probationary officer as soon as practicable after the expiration of that period of six months.

Section 40(7) of the Act requires that regulations shall make provision for and in relation to the review of a decision of the Commission which relates to the termination of employment of a probationary officer under section 40(4)(b).

The amendments to the Telecommunications Regulations (“the Principal Regulations”) allow for the appeal provisions which already attach to sections 55 and 56 of the Act to be attracted to the termination of employment of probationary officers under section 40(4)(b) of the Act. Section 55 relates to the removal, transfer or retirement of excess officers of the Commission and section 56 relates to the retirement, transfer or demotion, to a lower position, of officers considered to be ineffecient, incompetent, or incapable of performing their duties. These appeal provisions are located in Regulations 31-35 inclusive of


the Principal Regulations. In summary, these provide for the establishment of a Review Tribunal (the Tribunal) consisting of a Chairperson from the Promotions Appeal Board an officer nominated by the Commission and an officer nominated by the appropriate trade union or professional organisation. The Tribunal is empowered to undertake a full review of a Commission decision relating to the dismissal of the probationary officer without regard to legal formality and may recommend to the Commission action to be taken.

Sub-section 104(3A) of the Act provides that where a judgement creditor of an employee or officer of the Commission serves on the Commission an order for attachment of wages of that employee or officer, an administrative fee at a prescribed rate will be charged by the Commission.

An addition to the Principal Regulations sets a prescribed rate of $35 for the purposes of sub-section 104(3A). This fee is to cover administrative costs which will arise when the Commission is required to garnishee the wages of an officer or employee in order to settle a judgement debt.

The meaning of “appropriate organisations” as it appears in regulation 32 of the Principal Regulations in relation to review of decisions by a Review Tribunal is clarified and the same meaning will apply to review of decisions made in respect of termination of probationary appointments. The new definition will more readily identify the “appropriate organisation” (trade union or professional organisation) which is to nominate a representative on the Review Tribunal.

Details of the amending regulations are as follows:

Regulation 1: Provides a citation for the Telecommunications Regulations (The Principal Regulations).


Regulation 2: Provides an addition to the Heading of Part V of the Principal Regulations which will allow for the inclusion of Division 3 of the Act which relates to probationary officers.

Regulation 3: Inserts in existing regulation 31 of the Principal Regulations a reference to section 40 of the Act. This will allow for the formation, from time to time, of a Review Tribunal, for the purposes of reviewing decisions relating to probationary officers.

Regulation 4(a): Inserts in existing regulation 32 of the Principal Regulations a reference to section 40 of the Act. This allows for the constitution of a Review Tribunal to determine appeals against decisions relating to probationary officers.

Regulation 4(b): Provides a new definition of “appropriate organisation” in respect of the constitution of a Review Tribunal. This new definition clarifies the existing definition and will apply to applications for review under sections 40, 55 and 56 of the Act.

Regulation 5: Inserts in existing regulation 33 of the Principal Regulations a reference to section 40 of the Act. This will allow for an application for review of a decision made by the Commission in respect of probationary officers.

Regulation 6(a): Inserts a new sub-regulation 34(1) of the Principal Regulations which will extend the power of a Review Tribunal to undertake a full review of a decision relating to probationary officers who have submitted a written application for review under regulation 33 of the Principal Regulations.

Regulation 6(b): Inserts in existing regulation 34 of the Principal Regulations a reference to sections 55 and 56 of the Act. This will confine regulation 34(3) to sections 55 and 56 of the Act and exclude its operation in respect of probationary officers.

Regulation 34(3) requires the Tribunal to consider retraining an officer for another position or retaining an officer whose services may again become valuable as a result of normal staff losses. This provision provides protection which is appropriate in relation to excess officers (section 55) and to officers who have become inefficient or incapable in a particular position (section 56). It is not appropriate, however, to probationary officers, who do not have the same legitimate expectation of continued employment. During the six month period probationary officers are assessed as to their fitness for permanent appointment.

Regulation 7: Inserts in existing regulation 35 of the Principal Regulations a reference to section 40 of the Act. This will allow for the Review Tribunal to make recommendations to the Commission in respect of decisions made by the Commission in respect of probationary officers.

Regulation 8: Provides a new regulation 45 which will set a prescribed rate of $35 as the rate to be paid to the Commission under sub-section 104(3A) as an administrative fee by any person who serves on the Commission an order to garnishee the wages of an officer or employee of the Commission under section 104 of the Act. Section 104 of the Act allows for attachment of wages or salaries of officers or employees of the Commission.

AUTHORITY: Section 112 of the Telecommunications Act 1975

Overview

The Telecommunications (Employee Appeals) Amendment Regulations 2004 (Statutory Rule 1985 No. 295) were introduced to address the need for an enhanced review process for the termination of probationary officers under the Telecommunications Act 1975. Enacted by the authority of the Minister for Communications, these regulations aim to align the review mechanisms for probationary officers with those already established for other employment decisions under the Act. The primary objective is to ensure fair and transparent processes for probationary officers facing termination, by allowing them to appeal decisions through a Review Tribunal. This tribunal, comprising representatives from the Promotions Appeal Board, the Commission, and an appropriate trade union or professional organisation, is empowered to undertake a comprehensive review of the Commission’s decision without strict legal formalities and can recommend actions to the Commission. In addition to the enhanced review process, these regulations also introduce a prescribed administrative fee of $35 to be charged by the Commission when an order for attachment of wages is served on an employee or officer to settle a judgement debt, in line with subsection 104(3A) of the Act. The regulations also clarify the definition of "appropriate organisations" to better identify the trade union or professional organisation that nominates a representative on the Review Tribunal. This legislative amendment ensures that probationary officers have the same appeal rights as other officers, thereby maintaining consistency and fairness within the employment framework of the Telecommunications Act 1975.

Scope and Application

The Telecommunications Regulations 1985, amended by Statutory Rule 1985 No. 295, pertain to the administration and oversight of officers within the telecommunications sector in Australia. These regulations specifically apply to probationary officers appointed under section 40 of the Telecommunications Act 1975. The regulations provide a framework for the appointment, probation period, and potential termination of probationary officers, as well as the establishment of a Review Tribunal to review decisions related to these appointments. The Tribunal consists of a Chairperson from the Promotions Appeal Board, an officer nominated by the Commission, and an officer nominated by an appropriate trade union or professional organisation. This tribunal can review decisions relating to the termination of probationary officers and make recommendations to the Commission. The amendments also clarify the definition of "appropriate organisation" and extend appeal provisions to terminations of probationary officers. Furthermore, the regulations establish an administrative fee of $35 for garnishee orders served on the Commission to settle judgement debts against officers or employees, as mandated by sub-section 104(3A) of the Act. These regulations apply nationwide, covering all officers within the telecommunications sector, ensuring consistency and fairness in the administrative processes concerning probationary officers.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Statutory Rule (1985 No. 295) issued by the authority of the Minister for Communications provide amendments to the Telecommunications Regulations 1992 (Principal Regulations) under the Telecommunications Act 1975 (the Act). Regulation 2 adds a new heading to Part V of the Principal Regulations to include Division 3 of the Act, which pertains to probationary officers. Regulation 3 through 7 extend the existing provisions for the establishment of a Review Tribunal under regulations 31 to 35 of the Principal Regulations to include the review of decisions relating to the termination of employment of probationary officers under section 40(4)(b) of the Act. These regulations allow for the review of such decisions, the consideration of retraining or retention of officers, and the making of recommendations to the Commission. Regulation 8 introduces a new regulation 45, which sets a prescribed rate of $35 as the administrative fee to be paid to the Commission when a judgement creditor serves an order for attachment of wages of an officer or employee of the Commission under section 104(3A) of the Act. The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on parties and entities it governs. For instance, section 40 of the Act mandates that officers must be appointed on probation for six months from the commencement of their duties, unless the Commission otherwise directs. Section 40(7) requires that regulations must provide for the review of decisions relating to the termination of employment of probationary officers. The amendments ensure that the Review Tribunal, constituted under the regulations, is empowered to conduct a full review of such decisions, thereby providing a formal and structured process for appeal and review. Additionally, the new regulation 45 requires that an administrative fee of $35 is to be charged by the Commission when garnishing the wages of an officer or employee to settle a judgement debt, as stipulated under section 104(3A) of the Act. There are specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breaches of the Act and its regulations. The Act does not explicitly outline penalties for breaches of its provisions. However, the penalties for breaches of regulations made under the Act can include fines. For instance, failure to adhere to the prescribed administrative fee under regulation 45, which is set at $35, could result in administrative action. Moreover, the provisions regarding the Review Tribunal and the review of decisions provide a formal mechanism for addressing grievances and ensuring that decisions relating to employment terminations are made fairly and in accordance with the law. Failure to comply with these provisions could result in the decisions being quashed by a court or tribunal, thereby enforcing compliance with the legislative intent.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Review & Sunset Clauses
Regulatory Standards
Catchwords
Regulatory Review
Fees

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.