Telecommunications (Performance Standards) Determination 2002
The AUSTRALIAN COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY makes this Determination under section 115 of the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999.
Dated 27 March 2002 A.J SHAW Chair R HORTON Deputy Chair
Australian Communications Authority
1 Name of Determination
This Determination is the Telecommunications (Performance Standards) Determination 2002.
2 Commencement
This Determination commences on gazettal.
3 Definitions
Expressions used in this Determination have the same meaning as in the Telecommunications (Customer Service Guarantee) Standard 2000 (No. 2) (the Standard).
4 Offer of an alternative service
Under paragraph 8 (1) (a) of the Standard, a reasonable offer by a carriage service provider to supply a customer with an alternative service must:
(a) provide the customer with the choice between an interim service and an alternative service to enable the customer to make an informed judgement about the relative merits of both service offerings; and
(b) provide sufficient information about how the functionality and the terms and conditions of supply of the alternative service would be of benefit to the customer, relative to an interim service.
5 Meaning of sufficient information
Under paragraph 8 (1) (b) of the Standard, sufficient information supplied to a customer about the functionality of each service, and the terms and conditions of supply of each service, must include details of:
(a) any enhanced call handling services that may be supplied with the service; and
(b) charges payable by the customer; and
(c) connection timeframes; and
(d) the estimated period of supply of the service, taking into account the estimated time to repair or connect the service, and the maximum period allowed for the supply of an interim service.
Overview
The Telecommunications (Performance Standards) Determination 2002 was enacted by the Australian Communications Authority under section 115 of the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999. This Determination aims to address the need for clear and comprehensive standards in the telecommunications industry, ensuring that consumers receive adequate information when offered alternative services by their carriage service providers. By establishing precise criteria for the provision of such information, the Determination seeks to enhance consumer understanding and decision-making, thereby promoting fair and transparent practices within the industry. The policy objective is to protect consumer interests by ensuring that they are adequately informed about their service options and associated terms.
Scope and Application
The Telecommunications (Performance Standards) Determination 2002 applies to all telecommunications carriers operating in Australia, encompassing both interstate and intrastate services, as it is made under the authority of the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999. This legislation sets out the mandatory performance standards for telecommunications providers, ensuring that they offer reasonable alternatives to customers in the event of service disruptions or failures. The standards include the provision of sufficient information to enable customers to make informed choices between interim services and alternative services. This information must detail any enhanced call handling services, charges, connection timeframes, and the estimated period of service supply. The Determination ensures that telecommunications providers maintain a high level of customer service and transparency, thus protecting consumer interests and promoting fair competition within the telecommunications industry.
Key Provisions
The Telecommunications (Performance Standards) Determination 2002 sets out specific requirements for telecommunications providers regarding the offer of alternative services to customers. According to section 4, when offering an alternative service, providers must ensure that customers are given a choice between an interim service and the alternative service. This choice should enable the customer to make an informed judgement about the relative merits of both offerings (subsection 4(a)). Additionally, providers must supply sufficient information that allows the customer to understand the benefits of the alternative service compared to the interim service (subsection 4(b)). Section 5 elaborates on what constitutes sufficient information, which includes details about any enhanced call handling services, charges, connection timeframes, and the estimated period of supply, considering repair or connection times and the maximum period for interim service provision.
The obligations imposed by the Determination on telecommunications providers are clear and designed to ensure transparency and fairness in service offerings. Under section 4, providers must ensure that the alternative service offer is reasonable and informative. This means providing detailed and clear information that helps customers understand the differences and benefits of the alternative service. The information must cover essential aspects such as enhanced services, costs, timelines, and expected service durations, ensuring that customers can make well-informed decisions. Furthermore, the Determination mandates that this information must be supplied in a manner that is easily understandable, reflecting a commitment to consumer protection and service quality.
In terms of enforcement and consequences for non-compliance, the Determination does not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties within the text provided. However, under the broader legislative framework of the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999, non-compliance with performance standards can lead to various civil and administrative actions. The Australian Communications Authority (ACA) has the authority to take enforcement actions against providers who fail to meet these standards, which can include issuing fines, requiring corrective actions, or imposing other penalties as deemed necessary to ensure compliance. The exact penalties are not specified in the Determination but would be in accordance with the broader regulatory framework provided by the Act.