Telecommunications (Non-refundable Code Development Costs) Determination 2006
as amended
made under subsection 136E(1) of the
Telecommunications Act 1997
This compilation was prepared on 29 May 2014
taking into account amendments up to Telecommunications (Non-refundable Code Development Costs) Determination Variation 2014 (No 1)
Prepared by the Australian Communications and Media Authority
1 Name of Determination
This Determination is the Telecommunications (Non‑refundable Code Development Costs) Determination 2006.
2 Commencement
This Determination commences on the day after it is registered.
3 Definitions
In this Determination:
Act means the Telecommunications Act 1997.
industry participant means:
(a) a person mentioned in section 111 of the Act who is a participant in a section of the telecommunications industry;
(b) a person mentioned in section 111A of the Act who is a participant in a section of the e-marketing industry;
(c) a person mentioned in section 111AA of the Act who is a participant in a section of the telemarketing industry;
(d) a person mentioned in section 111AB of the Act who is a participant in a section of the fax marketing industry.
Note The following terms are defined in the Act:
ACMA (section 7);
consumer body (subsection 593 (8)).
4 Purpose of determination
(1) Subsection 136E (1) of the Act allows the ACMA to determine, for Division 6A of Part 6 of the Telecommunications Act 1997, costs that are not refundable costs incurred by a body or association in developing or varying a code.
(2) This determination sets out non‑refundable costs for Division 6A of Part 6.
5 Costs that are not refundable
For subsection 136E (1) of the Act, the following costs are specified:
(a) costs that are not directly attributable to the development or variation of a consumer-related industry code;
(b) costs incurred by an industry participant during the development or variation of a consumer-related industry code that would have been incurred had the participant not participated in the code development or variation process;
(c) costs incurred by a consumer body that are the subject of:
(i) a grant of financial assistance under subsection 593 (1) of the Act by the Minister; or
(ii) another program funded by the Commonwealth;
(d) any cost to the extent to which it was not reasonably incurred as part of the code development or variation process.
Notes to the Telecommunications (Non-refundable Code Development Costs) Determination 2006
Note 1
The Telecommunications (Non-refundable Code Development Costs) Determination 2006 (in force under subsection 136E(1) of the Telecommunications Act 1997) as shown in this compilation is amended as indicated in the Tables below.
Table of Instruments
Title | Date of FRLI registration | Date of commencement | Application, saving or transitional provisions |
Telecommunications (Non-refundable Code Development Costs) Determination 2006 | 24 March 2006 (see F2006L00920) | 25 March 2006 | ___ |
Telecommunications (Non-refundable Code Development Costs) Determination Variation 2014 (No. 1) | 20 May 2014 (see F2014L00569) | 21 May 2014 | ___ |
Table of Amendments
ad. = added or inserted am. = amended rep. = repealed rs. = repealed and substituted |
Provision affected | How affected |
| |
S. 3................. | am. 2014 No.1 |
S. 4................. | am. 2014 No.1 |
S. 5................. | rs. 2014 No. 1 |
Overview
The Telecommunications (Non-refundable Code Development Costs) Determination 2006 was made under the authority of the Telecommunications Act 1997 by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA). The determination was enacted to address the issue of non-refundable costs incurred by industry participants in the development and variation of consumer-related industry codes. This was to ensure that the financial burden of such activities does not unduly affect the industry participants, particularly those that are supported by grants or other forms of financial assistance from the Commonwealth. The objective of this legislation is to provide clarity on what constitutes non-refundable costs in the context of code development within the telecommunications sector.
This determination specifies the types of costs that are not refundable, including those not directly attributable to the development or variation of a consumer-related industry code, costs that would have been incurred regardless of participation in the process, and costs incurred by consumer bodies that are funded by grants or other programs. The legislation was designed to ensure transparency and fairness in the code development process, thereby promoting the efficient functioning of the telecommunications industry. It came into effect on 25 March 2006 and has since been subject to amendments to keep it aligned with evolving industry needs and practices.
Scope and Application
The Telecommunications (Non-refundable Code Development Costs) Determination 2006 applies to industry participants within the telecommunications, e-marketing, telemarketing, and fax marketing sectors as defined in the Telecommunications Act 1997. This Determination, which came into effect on the day after its registration, sets out the non-refundable costs incurred by these participants or bodies when developing or varying a consumer-related industry code. It specifies that certain costs are not refundable, including those not directly attributable to code development, those that would have been incurred regardless of participation, and costs covered by Commonwealth grants or other funding programs. Additionally, the Determination was amended in 2014, with the changes taking effect from May 2014. The ACMA has the authority to further refine or specify the application of these non-refundable costs through subordinate instruments, thereby extending or restricting the application as necessary.
Key Provisions
The Telecommunications (Non-refundable Code Development Costs) Determination 2006 (the Determination) sets out the costs that are not refundable for the development or variation of consumer-related industry codes under Division 6A of Part 6 of the Telecommunications Act 1997. The primary sections of the Determination specify these non-refundable costs, which include costs not directly attributable to the development or variation of a consumer-related industry code (Section 5(a)), costs incurred by an industry participant during the process that would have been incurred regardless of participation (Section 5(b)), costs incurred by a consumer body that are subject to a grant of financial assistance under the Act or another Commonwealth program (Section 5(c)), and any costs to the extent they were not reasonably incurred as part of the process (Section 5(d)).
The Determination imposes specific obligations on industry participants and consumer bodies involved in the code development or variation process. These parties must ensure that any costs incurred are directly attributable to the development or variation of a consumer-related industry code and are reasonably necessary for this purpose. Additionally, costs that would have been incurred regardless of participation in the process, or those funded by other government programs, are explicitly identified as non-refundable. This ensures that the financial burden of developing or varying industry codes falls appropriately on those directly involved in the process.
Failure to adhere to the provisions of the Determination may lead to significant consequences. While the Determination itself does not specify penalties for breaches, the overarching Telecommunications Act 1997 does provide a framework for enforcement. For example, breaches of the Act may result in civil or criminal penalties, including fines, depending on the severity and nature of the breach. The exact penalties are determined by the courts and can vary widely based on the specific circumstances of each case.
In summary, the Telecommunications (Non-refundable Code Development Costs) Determination 2006 clearly outlines the non-refundable costs associated with the development and variation of consumer-related industry codes. It imposes obligations on industry participants and consumer bodies to ensure that costs are directly related to the code development process and reasonably necessary. While the Determination itself does not detail specific penalties for non-compliance, the broader legal framework under the Telecommunications Act 1997 provides avenues for enforcement and potential penalties for breaches.