EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Issued by the authority of the Australian Communications and Media Authority
Telecommunications Act 1997
Telecommunications Numbering Plan Variation 2005 (No.3)
Declaration made under section 460(3)(a)(ii) of the Telecommunications Act 1997
Statutory basis
As the result of amendments introduced by the Telecommunications Legislation
Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act 2005, a minor variation to the Telecommunications Numbering Plan 1997 (the Plan) is not subject to the public consultation requirements under section 460 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 (the Act). Specifically, section 460(3)(a)(ii) of the Act provides that where Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) is of the opinion that a variation to the Plan is a minor variation then it may make a written declaration to that effect.
Background
The Telecommunications Numbering Variation 2005 (No. 3) amends the Plan to correct minor errors, clarify some ambiguities, remove redundant clauses and extend the end date for a trial.
The ACMA considers the impact of these amendments to the Plan to be minor and machinery in nature and is of the opinion that the variation is a minor variation.
In coming to its opinion, ACMA has had regard to section 18(2) (a) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 which sets out examples of circumstances where consultation may be unnecessary or inappropriate. In particular, consultation may be unnecessary or inappropriate in the case of “an instrument that is of a minor or machinery nature and does not substantially alter existing arrangements”.
Details of the Declaration
Section 1 provides that the variation may be cited as the Telecommunications (Minor Variation to Numbering Plan) Declaration 2005.
Section 2 provides that the declaration takes effect on the day after it is registered.
Section 3 declares that the Telecommunications Numbering Plan Variation (No. 3) 2005 is a minor variation.
Overview
The Telecommunications Numbering Plan Variation 2005 (No.3) was enacted to address minor errors, clarify ambiguities, remove redundant clauses, and extend the end date for a trial within the Telecommunications Numbering Plan 1997. This minor variation to the Plan was made under section 460(3)(a)(ii) of the Telecommunications Act 1997 by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), exempt from the public consultation requirements due to its minor and machinery nature. ACMA determined that this variation did not substantially alter existing arrangements, aligning with section 18(2)(a) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The objective of this legislative action was to streamline and refine the existing numbering plan without the need for extensive public consultation, ensuring that the changes made were administrative and did not significantly impact stakeholders.
Scope and Application
The Telecommunications (Minor Variation to Numbering Plan) Declaration 2005 applies to the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), which is responsible for making the declaration under section 460(3)(a)(ii) of the Telecommunications Act 1997. The declaration pertains to the Telecommunications Numbering Plan 1997, correcting minor errors, clarifying ambiguities, removing redundant clauses, and extending the end date for a trial. The scope of the Act includes the telecommunications industry and the conduct associated with telecommunications numbering. The declaration has a Commonwealth jurisdiction as it is a legislative instrument made under the authority of the Act. The declared variation is considered a minor and machinery change, and thus, it does not substantially alter existing arrangements, exempting it from the public consultation requirements under section 460 of the Telecommunications Act 1997. The Telecommunications Numbering Plan Variation 2005 (No. 3) is subject to the application of subordinate instruments as required by the Telecommunications Act 1997 and the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Key Provisions
The Telecommunications (Minor Variation to Numbering Plan) Declaration 2005, as cited in section 1, is the primary operative section that identifies the document and allows for its recognition and enforcement. This declaration is underpinned by section 460(3)(a)(ii) of the Telecommunications Act 1997, which permits the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) to declare minor variations to the Telecommunications Numbering Plan 1997 without the need for public consultation. Section 3 specifically declares that the Telecommunications Numbering Plan Variation (No. 3) 2005 is a minor variation, thus facilitating the amendment process as intended by the legislative framework.
In accordance with the Act, the ACMA has an obligation to assess whether a proposed variation to the Telecommunications Numbering Plan is minor or significant. If deemed minor, as in the case of the 2005 variation, the ACMA must declare it as such, adhering to the statutory requirements set out in section 460(3)(a)(ii). This process ensures that minor amendments to the Plan can be implemented efficiently without the need for extensive public consultation, thereby streamlining the regulatory process. The ACMA must consider the nature and impact of the proposed changes, ensuring they do not substantially alter existing arrangements, in line with the guidance provided by section 18(2)(a) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
The Telecommunications (Minor Variation to Numbering Plan) Declaration 2005 imposes obligations on the ACMA to carefully evaluate the proposed variations to ensure they meet the criteria for being classified as minor. This includes reviewing the changes to correct minor errors, clarify ambiguities, and remove redundant clauses, as exemplified in the 2005 variation. The declaration must be made in writing and take effect on the day after it is registered, as stipulated in section 2 of the declaration. The ACMA must also ensure that these amendments do not adversely affect the existing telecommunications infrastructure or consumer rights.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the Telecommunications Act 1997, particularly regarding the classification and implementation of minor variations, may result in administrative or legal consequences. While specific offences and penalties are not outlined in this declaration, breaches of the Act generally can lead to civil or criminal penalties. For instance, section 223 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 provides for penalties, including fines of up to $1,000,000 for corporations and $200,000 for individuals, for serious or repeated breaches. Such provisions underscore the importance of adhering to the legislative requirements and the potential repercussions for non-compliance.