Telecommunications Interception Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 2009

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au C2009A00032 In force Act

Legislation content

 

 

 

 

 

 

Telecommunications Interception Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 2009

 

No. 32, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

An Act to amend the law relating to surveillance and the interception of telecommunications, and for related purposes

 

 

Contents

1 Short title

2 Commencement

3 Schedule(s)

Schedule 1—Public Interest Monitor of Queensland

Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979

Schedule 2—Other amendments

Surveillance Devices Act 2004

Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979

 

 

 

Telecommunications Interception Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 2009

No. 32, 2009

 

 

 

An Act to amend the law relating to surveillance and the interception of telecommunications, and for related purposes

[Assented to 22 May 2009]

The Parliament of Australia enacts:

1  Short title

  This Act may be cited as the Telecommunications Interception Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 2009.

2  Commencement

 (1) Each provision of this Act specified in column 1 of the table commences, or is taken to have commenced, in accordance with column 2 of the table. Any other statement in column 2 has effect according to its terms.

 

Commencement information

Column 1

Column 2

Column 3

Provision(s)

Commencement

Date/Details

1.  Sections 1 to 3 and anything in this Act not elsewhere covered by this table

The day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent.

22 May 2009

2.  Schedule 1

The later of:

(a) the day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent; and

(b) the day on which the Telecommunications Interception Act 2009 of Queensland commences.

However, the provision(s) do not commence at all if the event mentioned in paragraph (b) does not occur.

18 June 2009

(paragraph (b) applies)

3.  Schedule 2

The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.

23 May 2009

Note: This table relates only to the provisions of this Act as originally passed by both Houses of the Parliament and assented to. It will not be expanded to deal with provisions inserted in this Act after assent.

 (2) Column 3 of the table contains additional information that is not part of this Act. Information in this column may be added to or edited in any published version of this Act.

3  Schedule(s)

  Each Act that is specified in a Schedule to this Act is amended or repealed as set out in the applicable items in the Schedule concerned, and any other item in a Schedule to this Act has effect according to its terms.


Schedule 1—Public Interest Monitor of Queensland

 

Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979

1  Subsection 5(1)

Insert:

deputy PIM (short for deputy public interest monitor) means a person appointed as a deputy public interest monitor under:

 (a) the Crime and Misconduct Act 2001 of Queensland; or

 (b) the Police Powers and Responsibilities Act 2000 of Queensland.

2  Subsection 5(1)

Insert:

PIM (short for public interest monitor) means the person appointed as the public interest monitor under:

 (a) the Crime and Misconduct Act 2001 of Queensland; or

 (b) the Police Powers and Responsibilities Act 2000 of Queensland.

3  After paragraph 35(1)(h)

Insert:

 (ha) requiring that a person who performs a function or exercises a power under section 45 in relation to an application by an eligible authority for a warrant must not undertake an inspection of the eligible authority’s records for the purpose referred to in paragraph (h) in relation to a record of the eligible authority that relates to the application;

4  At the end of Division 3 of Part 25 of Chapter 2

Add:

45  Application by interception agency of Queensland

Scope

 (1) This section applies if an interception agency of Queensland applies, under section 39, to an eligible Judge or nominated AAT member for a warrant in respect of a telecommunications service or a person.

PIM may make submissions

 (2) The PIM may, orally or in writing, make submissions to the Judge or nominated AAT member about the following matters:

 (a) in relation to an application for a warrant in respect of a telecommunications service—the matters mentioned in paragraphs 46(2)(a) to (f);

 (b) in relation to an application for a warrant in respect of a person—the matters mentioned in paragraphs 46A(2)(a) to (f).

PIM may question certain persons

 (3) The PIM may, for the purpose of making submissions under subsection (2), question:

 (a) the person making the application for the warrant on the interception agency’s behalf; or

 (b) a person who, under section 44, is required by the Judge or nominated AAT member to give further information to the Judge or nominated AAT member in connection with the application.

However, the PIM may only do so in the presence of the eligible Judge or nominated AAT member.

PIM may delegate powers

 (4) The PIM may delegate to a deputy PIM the PIM’s power under subsection (2) or (3), or both. The delegation must be in writing.

 (5) In exercising powers under a delegation, a deputy PIM must comply with any directions of the PIM.

45A  Queensland law not affected

  Nothing in this Act affects the operation of a law of Queensland, to the extent that the law authorises or requires:

 (a) a person who proposes to apply, under section 39, on behalf of an interception agency of Queensland for a warrant in respect of a telecommunications service or a person:

 (i) to notify the PIM of the proposed application; or

 (ii) to notify the PIM of any information that relates to the proposed application; or

 (iii) to give to the PIM any document that relates to the proposed application; or

 (b) a person who applies, under section 39, on behalf of an interception agency of Queensland for a warrant in respect of a telecommunications service or a person:

 (i) to notify the PIM of the application; or

 (ii) to notify the PIM of any information that relates to the application; or

 (iii) to give to the PIM any document that relates to the application.

5  At the end of paragraphs 46(2)(a) to (d)

Add “and”.

6  At the end of subsections 46(2) and 46A(2)

Add:

 ; and (g) in relation to an application by an interception agency of Queensland—any submissions made by the PIM under section 45 to the Judge or nominated AAT member.


Schedule 2—Other amendments

 

Surveillance Devices Act 2004

1  Subsection 6(1) (paragraph (g) of the definition of appropriate authorising officer)

Repeal the paragraph, substitute:

 (g) if the law enforcement officer is a law enforcement officer belonging to or seconded to the Crime and Misconduct Commission:

 (i) the chairperson (as defined by the Crime and Misconduct Commission Act 2001 of Queensland); or

 (ii) an assistant commissioner (as defined by the Crime and Misconduct Commission Act 2001 of Queensland); and

Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979

2  Subsection 5(1) (paragraph (f) of the definition of certifying officer)

Repeal the paragraph, substitute:

 (f) in the case of the Crime and Misconduct Commission:

 (i) the Chairperson (as defined by the Crime and Misconduct Act); or

 (ii) an Assistant Commissioner (as defined by the Crime and Misconduct Act); or

3  Subsection 5AC(4)

After “in writing,”, insert “an officer of the police force of the State whose rank is equivalent to that of”.

4  Transitional provision

(1) This item applies to an authorisation that has effect, on and after the commencement of item 25 of Schedule 2 to the Telecommunications Interception Legislation Amendment Act 2008, as if it were an authorisation in force under subsection 5AC(4) of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979.

Note: Item 25 of Schedule 2 to the Telecommunications Interception Legislation Amendment Act 2008 commenced on 4 October 2008.

(2) The authorisation has effect, on and after the commencement of this item, as if it were an authorisation in force under subsection 5AC(4) of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979, as amended by item 3 of this Schedule.

(3) To avoid doubt, the amendments made by item 3 of this Schedule do not affect the validity of anything done before the commencement of this item in relation to, or in reliance on, an authorisation to which this item applies.

 

 

 

 

 

[Minister’s second reading speech made in—

House of Representatives on 3 December 2008

Senate on 5 February 2009]

(243/08)

 

Overview

The Telecommunications Interception Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 2009 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to amend existing laws related to surveillance and the interception of telecommunications, addressing specific gaps in the current legal framework. The primary objective of this Act is to enhance the oversight and regulation of telecommunications surveillance by updating and refining the roles and responsibilities of key officials involved in this process. This legislative amendment is particularly aimed at ensuring that the surveillance mechanisms are robust and comply with the evolving technological and security landscape. The Act received Royal Assent on 22 May 2009, with certain provisions commencing on various dates specified in the Act to ensure a phased implementation aligned with related legislative changes.

Scope and Application

The Telecommunications Interception Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 2009 amends the law relating to surveillance and the interception of telecommunications. The Act applies to the interception agencies in Queensland, specifically to the public interest monitors and deputy public interest monitors appointed under the Crime and Misconduct Act 2001 and the Police Powers and Responsibilities Act 2000 of Queensland. It primarily concerns the functions and powers of these monitors when an interception agency applies for a warrant in relation to a telecommunications service or a person. The Act's jurisdiction is Commonwealth, impacting the existing framework of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 and the Surveillance Devices Act 2004. The Act's provisions come into effect on various dates, with some provisions dependent on the commencement of related Queensland legislation. Notably, the Act does not affect Queensland laws that authorise or require notification to the public interest monitor about applications for warrants by interception agencies. The Act extends its application through amendments to existing legislation, ensuring that the roles and powers of the public interest monitor and deputy public interest monitor are clearly defined and operationalised within the Queensland context.

Key Provisions

The Telecommunications Interception Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 2009 amends the law relating to surveillance and the interception of telecommunications. The Act's primary provisions involve amendments to the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 and the Surveillance Devices Act 2004, and it also includes transitional provisions for existing authorisations. Section 1 of the Act provides the short title, while section 2 details the commencement dates for various provisions. The Act is structured around two schedules: Schedule 1 pertains to the Public Interest Monitor (PIM) of Queensland, and Schedule 2 addresses other amendments to existing legislation. Under Schedule 1, the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 is amended to allow the PIM to make submissions to eligible Judges or nominated Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) members regarding applications for warrants by interception agencies of Queensland. The PIM can question the applicant and other relevant individuals but must do so in the presence of the Judge or AAT member. The PIM also has the authority to delegate these powers to a deputy PIM in writing, and any such delegation must be executed in compliance with the PIM's directions. Additionally, the Act clarifies that nothing in the amended Act affects existing Queensland laws that allow for the notification of PIMs regarding warrant applications by interception agencies. Schedule 2 of the Act modifies the Surveillance Devices Act 2004 by updating the definition of "appropriate authorising officer" to include specific officers of the Crime and Misconduct Commission in Queensland. It also amends the definition of "certifying officer" in the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 to include similar officers of the Crime and Misconduct Commission. A transitional provision ensures that authorisations in effect after the commencement of certain amendments remain valid, thereby maintaining the continuity of existing authorisations despite the legislative changes. The Act imposes specific obligations on interception agencies of Queensland, requiring them to notify the PIM of any proposed or actual applications for warrants. These obligations are designed to ensure that the PIM can effectively monitor and review the processes and decisions related to telecommunications interception. Failure to comply with these obligations could result in legal challenges or other consequences under the relevant Acts. In terms of penalties and consequences, the Act does not specify particular offences or penalties within its text. However, breaches of the obligations imposed on interception agencies or other entities could potentially lead to legal actions under the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 or the Surveillance Devices Act 2004, depending on the nature and severity of the breach. The penalties for such breaches would be determined in accordance with the provisions of these Acts, which could include fines, imprisonment, or other civil or criminal sanctions.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Surveillance Law
Instrument
Act
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Regulatory Standards
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.