Telecommunications (Interception and Access) (Staff Members of NSW Police Force) Declaration 2007

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au F2007L03549 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979

 

Telecommunications (Interception and Access) (Staff Members of NSW Police Force) Declaration 2007

 

Under the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (the Act) warrants may be issued to agencies to permit the interception of communications.  The power to exercise the authority conferred by an interception warrant may only be exercised by an officer or staff member of an agency in relation to whom an approval is in force pursuant to subsection 55(3) of the Act.

 

Subsection 55(3) provides that the chief officer of an agency may approve officers or staff members, or classes of officers or staff members, of the agency or another agency to exercise the authority conferred by warrants.  An ‘officer’ in relation to the Police Force of a State is defined as an officer of that Police Force and a ‘staff member’ is defined as an Australian Federal Police (AFP) employee who is not a ‘member’ of the AFP.  Accordingly, the chief officer of an agency may approve sworn members of the Police Force to exercise the authority conferred by warrants.

 

Section 6N of the Act enables the Attorney-General to declare that members of an agency included in a specified class of members occupy positions corresponding to those of AFP employees who are not members of the AFP.  The effect of such a declaration is to enable the chief officer of an agency to approve unsworn staff members of a Police Force to execute the authority conferred by warrants.

 

The New South Wales Police were declared to be an agency for the purposes of the Act on 30 January 1989.  Accordingly, the New South Wales Police can apply for warrants and intercept communications under the Act.  The New South Wales Police requested that a declaration pursuant to section 6N of the Act be made in relation to unsworn members of the New South Wales Police employed or seconded to the Telecommunications Interception Branch or unsworn members participating in high priority investigations requiring interception and who will have the function of monitoring intercepted communications. 

 

On reviewing the duties and conditions of employment, the Attorney-General is satisfied that unsworn members of the New South Wales Police employed or seconded to the Telecommunications Interception Branch or unsworn members participating in high priority investigations requiring interception occupy sufficiently corresponding positions to those of staff members of the Australian Federal Police. 

 

Accordingly, the Attorney-General has executed an instrument declaring that the
unsworn members of the New South Wales Police employed or seconded to the Telecommunications Interception Branch or unsworn members participating in high priority investigations requiring interception occupy positions corresponding to those of staff members of the Australian Federal Police.  This means that the Commissioner of the New South Wales Police is able to approve these unsworn members to exercise the authority conferred by an interception warrant.

Overview

The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) (Staff Members of NSW Police Force) Declaration 2007 was enacted to address a gap in the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979, which governs the interception of communications. The 1979 Act permits the issuance of warrants to agencies for intercepting communications, but it restricts the exercise of these powers to approved officers or staff members. Under this framework, the chief officer of an agency can approve sworn members of the police force to exercise these powers. However, this did not extend to unsworn members, unless a specific declaration was made by the Attorney-General. This gap was intended to be filled by allowing the chief officer of the New South Wales Police to approve unsworn members involved in telecommunications interception activities to exercise the powers granted by the warrants. The Attorney-General made the declaration based on the corresponding duties and conditions of employment between these unsworn NSW Police members and staff members of the Australian Federal Police.

Scope and Application

The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) (Staff Members of NSW Police Force) Declaration 2007 applies specifically to the New South Wales Police Force, enabling certain unsworn staff members to exercise powers under the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979. This legislation allows for the interception of communications under warrant and applies to any agency that has been declared under the Act. The 2007 Declaration extends the authority to intercept communications to unsworn members of the New South Wales Police who are either employed or seconded to the Telecommunications Interception Branch or those participating in high-priority investigations requiring interception and monitoring of such communications. This declaration was made on the basis that these unsworn members occupy positions corresponding to those of staff members of the Australian Federal Police. The application of this declaration is confined to the New South Wales Police Force, with no broader jurisdictional implications, and does not extend to other states or territories unless separately declared.

Key Provisions

The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) (Staff Members of NSW Police Force) Declaration 2007 amends the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (TIA Act) by enabling the Commissioner of the New South Wales (NSW) Police to approve certain staff members to exercise the authority conferred by interception warrants. This is pursuant to section 55(3) of the TIA Act, which allows the chief officer of an agency to approve officers or staff members to exercise these powers (s. 6N). The TIA Act permits the issuance of warrants to agencies for the interception of communications, but only officers or staff members approved by the chief officer may exercise these powers. The declaration specifically addresses unsworn members of the NSW Police employed or seconded to the Telecommunications Interception Branch or participating in high priority investigations requiring interception. These staff members are deemed to occupy positions corresponding to those of staff members of the Australian Federal Police (AFP) who are not members of the AFP. Under this declaration, the Commissioner of the NSW Police can approve these unsworn staff members to exercise the authority conferred by warrants. This means that, in line with the provisions of the TIA Act, these staff members can now intercept telecommunications as authorised by a warrant. The approval process ensures that only those with the appropriate qualifications and responsibilities are authorised to undertake these activities, maintaining the integrity and legality of the interception process. The approval must be in line with the duties and conditions of employment of these staff members, ensuring that they are suitably positioned to perform these tasks effectively and lawfully. The declaration imposes specific obligations on the NSW Police and the approved staff members. The Commissioner must ensure that any staff member approved to exercise the authority conferred by warrants is appropriately vetted and trained for the responsibilities involved. This includes having a clear understanding of the legal framework governing telecommunications interception and the proper procedures for executing warrants. Approved staff members must adhere to the conditions set forth in the warrants and the TIA Act, ensuring that their actions are lawful and justified. Additionally, the NSW Police must maintain records of approvals and ensure compliance with all relevant provisions of the TIA Act. Breaches of the provisions under the TIA Act can result in significant legal consequences. The TIA Act includes offences related to the unauthorised interception of communications, which can lead to both civil and criminal penalties. For instance, unauthorised interception can result in a civil penalty of up to $27,500 per interception. In criminal cases, individuals found guilty of offences under the TIA Act can face imprisonment, with penalties varying depending on the severity of the offence. For example, an offence involving the interception of communications for an improper purpose can result in a maximum penalty of five years imprisonment, while more serious offences can lead to higher penalties. The Act also provides for the recovery of damages for any loss or damage caused by unauthorised interception.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
National Security Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Declaration
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Delegated & Subordinate Legislation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.