Telecommunications (Interception and Access) (Emergency Services Facilities - Australian Capital Territory) Amendment Instrument 2010

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2010L01079 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

 

Issued by the Authority of the Attorney-General

 

Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979

 

Telecommunications (Interception and Access) (Emergency Service Facilities – Australian Capital Territory) Instrument 2010

 

The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (the Act) establishes a general prohibition against the interception of communications passing over a telecommunications system.  The purpose of the Instrument is to ensure that listening to or recording calls to and from a declared emergency service facility is not an interception for the purposes of the Act.

 

Subsection 6(2F) of the Act provides that a person who is lawfully engaged in duties relating to the receiving and handling of communications to or from an ‘emergency service facility’ may listen to or record a communication to or from the emergency service facility without contravening the general prohibition against interception.

 

The exception provided by subsection 6(2F) of the Act only applies to emergency services facilities that are declared by the Minister pursuant to subsection 6(2B) of the Act.  To protect against the publication of the location of the facilities, which are critical infrastructure, a declaration under subsection 6(2B) of the Act is not a legislative instrument.

 

To maintain Parliamentary scrutiny of the declarations, subsection 6(2D) of the Act provides that the Minister must, by legislative instrument, specify the name of the force or service operating the premises to which the declaration relates, and the geographical region in which those premises are located.

The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) (Emergency Service Facilities Australian Capital Territory) Instrument 2010 is made under subsection 6(2B) of the Act and amends the current instrument.  The related declaration, the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) (Emergency Service Facilities – Australian Capital Territory) Declaration 2010, is made under subsection 6(2B) of the Act and amends the current declaration. 

 

The new Instrument and Declaration add an emergency service facility operated by the Australian Federal Police (AFP) in Fairbairn commencing 2 May 2010.  The new Instrument and Declaration also remove the emergency service facility operated by the AFP in the Canberra City, commencing 5 May 2010. 

 

Consultation with the Australian Federal Police was undertaken in relation to the Instrument and Declaration.  The Attorney-General is satisfied that the operations at these facilities meet the requirements of section 6 of the Act, being facilities operated by a police service to enable that service to deal with requests for assistance in an emergency.

 

Sections 1 to 3 and Schedule 1 of this Instrument commence on 2 May 2010.  Schedule 2 of this Instrument commences on 5 May 2010.

 

Overview

The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) (Emergency Service Facilities – Australian Capital Territory) Instrument 2010 was introduced to address a specific issue under the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979. This Act generally prohibits the interception of communications passing over telecommunications systems, but includes an exception for certain emergency service facilities. The purpose of the Instrument is to ensure that listening to or recording calls to and from declared emergency service facilities does not constitute an interception for the purposes of the Act. This is to facilitate the lawful duties of personnel handling communications at these critical infrastructure locations. The Instrument was enacted under subsection 6(2B) of the Act, with the enacting body being the Minister, who must declare the facilities and specify the relevant geographical regions through a legislative instrument to maintain parliamentary scrutiny. The Instrument and accompanying declaration add a new facility operated by the Australian Federal Police in Fairbairn, effective from 2 May 2010, and remove a facility in Canberra City, effective from 5 May 2010. The Attorney-General has confirmed that these operations meet the requirements of section 6 of the Act, ensuring they are facilities used by police services to manage emergency requests for assistance.

Scope and Application

The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 establishes a general prohibition on the interception of communications passing over a telecommunications system, with specific provisions allowing certain authorised personnel to listen to or record communications to and from declared emergency service facilities without contravening this prohibition. This Act applies broadly to all persons and entities within its jurisdiction, which includes the Commonwealth of Australia. However, it excludes certain interceptions when performed by individuals lawfully engaged in duties related to the receiving and handling of communications to or from an emergency service facility, as specified under subsection 6(2F) of the Act. This exception is contingent on the facility being declared by the Minister pursuant to subsection 6(2B), with the specific details of such declarations not being legislative instruments to safeguard the critical infrastructure locations from public disclosure. The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) (Emergency Service Facilities – Australian Capital Territory) Instrument 2010 extends the application of the Act by declaring specific facilities, such as those operated by the Australian Federal Police, thereby allowing authorised personnel to lawfully intercept communications for emergency purposes within the defined geographical regions.

Key Provisions

The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) (Emergency Service Facilities – Australian Capital Territory) Instrument 2010 amends the existing framework set by the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (TIA Act) to clarify the circumstances under which communications to and from specific emergency service facilities can be lawfully intercepted. Under subsection 6(2F) of the TIA Act, a person lawfully engaged in duties relating to the receiving and handling of communications to or from a declared emergency service facility can listen to or record such communications without contravening the general prohibition against interception. This exception applies only to facilities declared by the Minister under subsection 6(2B) of the TIA Act. The Instrument and accompanying declaration specify which facilities are exempt from the interception prohibition and ensure that the details of these facilities, which are critical infrastructure, are not publicly disclosed to protect their security. The obligations imposed by the Instrument on the parties governed by the Act primarily revolve around the lawful operation of emergency service facilities. Those operating these facilities must adhere to the conditions set out by the TIA Act and the specific declarations made under subsection 6(2B). The Minister's role involves making the necessary declarations that specify the facilities and the geographical regions in which they are located, as mandated by subsection 6(2D) of the TIA Act. These declarations are not legislative instruments to safeguard the sensitive information regarding the facilities' locations. The Australian Federal Police, as the operating authority for the declared facilities, must ensure that the operations at these sites comply with the stipulations of section 6 of the TIA Act, ensuring that they are genuinely being used to handle emergency communications. Failure to comply with the provisions of the TIA Act and the Instrument can result in significant legal consequences. The Act generally prohibits the interception of communications, with specific exceptions outlined for declared emergency service facilities. Breaches of these provisions can lead to both criminal and civil penalties. While the Instrument itself does not explicitly detail the penalties for non-compliance, the overarching TIA Act provides that any interception of communications not permitted by the Act can lead to criminal charges, with potential penalties including fines and imprisonment. Civil actions may also be pursued for unlawful interception, with affected parties entitled to seek damages for any harm caused by the breach.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
National Security Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.