Telecommunications (Interception and Access) (Emergency Service Facilities - Tasmania) Instrument 2007

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2007L01278 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

 

Issued by the Authority of the Attorney-General

 

Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979

 

Telecommunications (Interception and Access) (Emergency Service Facilities –Tasmania) Instrument 2007

 

The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (the Act) establishes a general prohibition against the interception of communications passing over a telecommunications system.  The purpose of the Instrument is to ensure that listening to or recording calls to and from a declared emergency service facility is not an interception for the purposes of the Act.

 

Subsection 6(2F) of the Act provides that a person who is lawfully engaged in duties relating to the receiving and handling of communications to or from an ‘emergency service facility’ may listen to or record a communication to or from the emergency service facility without contravening the general prohibition against interception.

The exception provided by subsection 6(2F) of the Act only applies to emergency services facilities that are declared by the Minister pursuant to subsection 6(2B) of the

Act.  To protect against the publication of the location of the facilities, which are critical infrastructure, a declaration under subsection 6(2B) of the Act is not a legislative instrument.

 

To maintain Parliamentary scrutiny of the declarations, subsection 6(2D) of the Act provides that the Minister must, by legislative instrument, specify the name of the force or service operating the premises to which the declaration relates, and the geographical region in which those premises are located.

 

In December 2005, the Attorney-General, as Minister administering the Act, made the Telecommunications (Interception) (Emergency Service Facility) Declaration 2005 and eight corresponding legislative instruments.  On further consideration, a single declaration has caused significant complexity with amendments.

 

Consequently, the Attorney-General has now made eight separate declarations and eight separate corresponding legislative instruments.  This will facilitate the ease of future amendments, which for operational reasons, will always need to be made urgently.

The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) (Emergency Service FacilitiesTasmania) Instrument 2007 is made under subsection 6(2D) of the Act.  The related declaration, the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) (Emergency Service Facilities - Tasmania) Declaration 2007, is made under subsection 6(2B) of the Act.

 

The only material change to the declared facilities in Tasmania since the previous instrument was made is the removal of the Burnie Control Room.

 

This instrument commences on the day after it is registered.

 

Overview

The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) (Emergency Service Facilities – Tasmania) Instrument 2007 was introduced to clarify and facilitate the legal framework for monitoring communications at emergency service facilities in Tasmania, ensuring compliance with the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979. This Act was enacted to establish a general prohibition on the interception of communications passing over a telecommunications system, with specific exceptions for authorised personnel engaged in duties related to emergency services facilities. The instrument aims to provide a clear and updated legislative basis for the operation of these facilities, allowing for lawful monitoring without contravening the general prohibition against interception. The Instrument was made under subsection 6(2D) of the Act, ensuring that the geographical details of the facilities are specified, while the actual declaration of the facilities as emergency service facilities is made under subsection 6(2B). This legislative approach was designed to protect the critical nature of these facilities by keeping their exact locations confidential, while maintaining necessary parliamentary oversight through the specification of regions and operating forces.

Scope and Application

The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 applies to any person or entity that might otherwise be involved in the interception of communications over telecommunications systems, with a broad sweep that encompasses various industries and transactions reliant on such communications. The Act sets a nationwide prohibition against interception unless specific exceptions are met, and its jurisdictional reach extends across the Commonwealth of Australia. However, the Act provides exceptions for those lawfully engaged in duties related to receiving and handling communications to or from declared emergency service facilities, as outlined in the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) (Emergency Service Facilities – Tasmania) Instrument 2007. This Instrument is designed to ensure that listening to or recording calls to and from these emergency facilities does not constitute an interception under the Act. The Instrument specifies the name of the force or service operating the premises and the geographical region where these premises are located, thereby maintaining parliamentary scrutiny without disclosing the exact locations of critical infrastructure. This legislative framework ensures that emergency services can operate effectively while still adhering to the overarching protections against unwarranted communication interception.

Key Provisions

The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) (Emergency Service Facilities – Tasmania) Instrument 2007 (the Instrument) and the accompanying declaration (the Declaration) are critical provisions under the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (the Act). The Instrument, made under subsection 6(2D) of the Act, serves to specify the force or service operating the premises and the geographical region in which these emergency service facilities are located, thereby maintaining necessary Parliamentary scrutiny. The Declaration, made under subsection 6(2B) of the Act, identifies the facilities that are exempted from the general prohibition against communication interception. This exemption allows authorised personnel to listen to or record communications to and from these facilities without contravening the Act. It is important to note that this declaration is not a legislative instrument to protect the sensitive nature of these facilities, which are deemed critical infrastructure. Under the Act, as detailed in section 6(2F), lawful interception by personnel engaged in duties relating to emergency service facilities is permitted. This means that only those who are authorised to handle communications to and from these facilities can listen to or record such communications. This exception only applies to facilities that have been declared by the Minister, as stipulated in subsection 6(2B) of the Act. These facilities must be specified in a legislative instrument under subsection 6(2D) of the Act, which includes the name of the operating force or service and the geographical region of the premises. The Instrument and the Declaration together ensure that the Act’s general prohibition is not contravened while still allowing authorised personnel to carry out their duties effectively. The obligations imposed by the Instrument and Declaration are clear and straightforward. The Minister must ensure that the declaration specifies the correct facilities and that the Instrument accurately details the geographical regions and operating forces. This ensures that only authorised personnel can intercept communications for legitimate operational purposes. The Act requires that these facilities remain confidential to protect critical infrastructure, so the declarations themselves are not made public. The Minister’s role in maintaining this balance between operational needs and confidentiality is crucial. Failure to comply with the provisions of the Act can lead to significant consequences. Under the Act, any person who intercepts communications without lawful authority commits an offence. The maximum penalties for such offences can include substantial fines and imprisonment. Specifically, under section 11 of the Act, the penalties for unauthorised interception can be up to five years imprisonment and/or fines up to $210,000 for individuals, and higher penalties for corporations. These severe penalties underscore the importance of adhering to the Act’s provisions and the need for accurate and timely declarations and legislative instruments to facilitate lawful interception by authorised personnel.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
National Security Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Delegation & Subordinate Legislation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.