Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Regulations 2007 (No. 1)

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2007L02415 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Select Legislative Instrument 2007 No. 237

Issued by the authority of the Attorney-General

Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979

Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Regulation 2007 (No. 1)

Section 300 of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations, not inconsistent with the Act, prescribing matters required or permitted by the Act to be prescribed or necessary or convenient to be prescribed, for carrying out or giving effect to the Act.

The Act prohibits the interception of telecommunications, except in specified circumstances.  In particular, the Act provides for the issue of warrants authorising the interception of telecommunications.

Interception warrants can relate to a specific service (a service warrant issued under section 46 of the Act) or to all communications made by a particular person (a named person warrant issued under section 46A of the Act).

All warrants issued under the Act must be issued in accordance with the prescribed forms set out in the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Regulations 1987 (the Principal Regulations).  There was one prescribed form for issuing service warrants under section 46 of the Act and one prescribed form for issuing named person warrants under section 46A of the Act. 

The Regulations amend the Principal Regulations to provide one prescribed form for each type of warrant that can be issued pursuant to section 46 of the Act and one prescribed form for each type of warrant that can be issued pursuant to section 46A of the Act.  Four forms will replace the current two.

A service warrant can authorise the interception of telecommunications to or from a service used or likely to be used by a person of interest.  Alternatively, a service warrant can authorise the interception of telecommunications to or from a service used or likely to be used a person not under investigation but known to communicate with the person of interest in certain circumstances
(a B-Party warrant).

A named person warrant can authorise the interception of any telecommunications services used or likely to be used by a person of interest.  Alternatively, a named person warrant can authorise the interception of communications to or from any telecommunications devices used or likely to be used by a person of interest.


In particular, the Regulations amend the Principal Regulations to provide:

  • a prescribed form for a service warrant which authorises the interception of a single telecommunications service;
  • a prescribed form for a service warrant in relation to a B-Party, which authorises the interception of a single telecommunications service of a person who is not suspected of being involved in a serious offence but who communicates with a person of interest;
  • a prescribed form for a named person warrant in relation to services which authorises the interception of any service a named person is using or is likely to use; and
  • a prescribed form for a named person warrant in relation to devices which authorises the interception of communications to or from any telecommunications device that the named person is using or is likely to use.

It is important to note that the amendments would not make any substantial changes to the existing forms.  The purpose of the amendments was to simplify the choice of the correct prescribed form for warrants issued under sections 46 and 46A of the Act.

The Regulations are a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 and commenced on 20 August 2007.

The amendments were developed in consultation with the Director of Public Prosecutions.  Agencies which have the power to apply for telecommunications interception warrants have been advised of the changes affected by the Regulations.


Details of the Regulations are as follows:

Regulation 1 – Name of Regulations

Regulation 1 provides that these Regulations are the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Regulations 2007 (No. 1).

Regulation 2 – Commencement

Regulation 2 provides that the Regulations commence on 20 August 2007.

Regulation 3 – Amendment of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Regulations 1987

Regulation 3 provides that Schedule 1 amends the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Regulations 1987.

Schedule 1 – Amendments

Item [1]  Regulation 3

Amends regulation 3 to the Principal Regulations to provide that each of the forms contained Schedule 3 of the Principal Regulations is prescribed for the purposes of subsection 49(1) of the Act.  The amendment would ensure that one form is prescribed for each interception warrant that can be issued under the Act.

Item [2]  Schedule 3, Forms 3 and 4

Substitutes existing Forms 3 and 4 of the Principal Regulations with new Forms 1, 2, 3 and 4.   The amendment provides different forms for each different type of warrant that can be obtained under sections 46 and 46A of the Act. 


Form 1 is the form prescribed for a service warrant which authorises the interception of a telecommunications service used or likely to be used by the person of interest.


Form 2 is the form prescribed for a service warrant authorising the interception of a telecommunications service used or likely to be used by a person likely to communicate with the person of interest.

 

Form 3 is the form prescribed for a named person warrant authorising the interception of any telecommunications service used or likely to be used by the person of interest.

 

Form 4 is the form prescribed for a named person warrant authorising the interception of any communications made by means of a telecommunications device used or likely to be used by the person of interest.

 

Overview

The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Regulation 2007 (No. 1) was enacted to address the need for more specific and streamlined processes for the issuance of warrants for telecommunications interception under the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979. This amendment was introduced by the Australian Parliament and aims to provide clarity and precision in the forms required for different types of interception warrants, thereby enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of the warrant issuance process. The Regulation was designed to replace the existing two forms for warrants with four distinct forms, each tailored to specific types of warrants: one for service warrants targeting a single telecommunications service used by a person of interest, another for service warrants targeting individuals who are not under investigation but communicate with the person of interest (B-Party warrants), and two forms for named person warrants targeting either any telecommunications service or any telecommunications device used by the person of interest. These amendments seek to simplify the choice of the correct prescribed form, ensuring that the appropriate warrant is issued in accordance with the Act.

Scope and Application

The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Regulation 2007 (No. 1) amends the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Regulations 1987 to prescribe new forms for the issue of warrants authorising the interception of telecommunications under the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979. The Act applies to any person or entity conducting telecommunications interception activities in Australia, including law enforcement agencies, telecommunications service providers, and other authorised entities. The Act's jurisdiction extends across the Commonwealth of Australia. The Regulation does not alter the substantive requirements for the issuance of interception warrants but simplifies the process by providing distinct forms for different types of warrants. The changes are designed to ensure clarity and precision in the application for warrants, reducing the potential for errors in the selection of the correct form. The amendments were made in consultation with relevant stakeholders and aim to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the warrant issuance process.

Key Provisions

The main sections of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Regulation 2007 (No. 1) amend the existing Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Regulations 1987 to introduce new prescribed forms for telecommunications interception warrants. The Act, under sections 46 and 46A, allows for the issuance of warrants that authorise the interception of telecommunications either related to a specific service or to all communications made by a particular person. The regulation provides for four distinct forms to replace the previous two forms: Form 1 for a service warrant concerning a specific telecommunications service used by a person of interest, Form 2 for a service warrant concerning a B-Party (a person not under investigation but known to communicate with a person of interest), Form 3 for a named person warrant concerning any telecommunications service used by a person of interest, and Form 4 for a named person warrant concerning any telecommunications device used by a person of interest. These amendments impose specific obligations on entities authorised to apply for interception warrants. They must now use the correct prescribed form as specified in the new regulation when applying for a warrant. The use of the correct form ensures that the warrant is valid and complies with the requirements of the Act. Agencies with the power to apply for these warrants have been informed of these changes to ensure they are aware of the new forms and can correctly apply for warrants as necessary. Breaches of the provisions in the Act and the Regulations can lead to significant civil and criminal consequences. Intercepting telecommunications without a valid warrant is a strict liability offence under section 50 of the Act, which means that intent does not need to be proven for liability to be established. The maximum penalty for an individual offender is a fine of up to 5,000 penalty units or imprisonment for up to 10 years, or both. For a corporate offender, the maximum penalty is a fine of up to 50,000 penalty units. The misuse or unauthorised disclosure of intercepted communications is also an offence, with penalties including fines and imprisonment. These stringent penalties underscore the importance of adhering to the legal requirements for issuing and executing interception warrants.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
National Security Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.