Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Regulations 2000 (No. 2)

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2000B00350 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Regulations 2000 (No. 2) 2000 No. 325

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

STATUTORY RULES 2000 No. 325

Issued by the Authority of the Attorney-General

Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979

Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Regulations 2000 (No. 2)

Part VI of the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979 (the Act) provides for warrants authorising agencies to intercept telecommunications. Section 49 of the Act provides in part that warrants shall be in accordance with the prescribed form. Section 108 permits the GovernorGeneral to make regulations prescribing matters required or permitted to be prescribed by the Act.

Part VI Division 4 provides for several categories of warrants. Section 45 provides for the issue of a telecommunications service warrant in relation to a class 1 offence. Section 45A provides for the issue of a named person warrant in relation to a class 1 offence. Section 46 provides for the issue of a telecommunications service warrant in relation to a class 2 offence. Section 46A provides for the issue of a named person warrant in relation to a class 2 offence. Section 48 provides for the issue of a warrant for entry onto premises. Telecommunications service warrants authorise the interception of a particular service while named person warrants authorise the interception of all services used, or likely to be used, by a named person. Section 48 warrants may be sought where sections 45 or 46 authorise the use of a warrant but for technical or other reasons it is impractical or inappropriate to intercept communications under a warrant otherwise then by the use of equipment or a line installed on a premises.

The Telecommunications (Interception) Regulations) 1987 prescribe the form of warrant for the purpose of sections 45, 45A, 46, 46A and 48.

The Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2000 amended section 55 of the Act to enable an agency to designate officers or members or classes of officers or members of another agency to undertake interceptions on behalf of that agency.

The regulations amend the form of warrant to ensure that interceptions may be undertaken on behalf of another agency where the appropriate delegations under section 55 of the Act are in place. The amendments also re-drafted the section 45, 46 and 48 warrants in plain English drafting style consistent with 45A and 46A warrants.

Warrants under section 48 of the Act authorising entry onto premises may be sought in circumstances where a telecommunications service warrant or a named person warrant could be issued but circumstances exist that necessitate a section 48 warrant. The amendments prescribe a form of warrant for section 48 warrants.

Details of the Regulations are in the attachment.

The Regulations commence on gazettal.

Attachment

NOTES ON THE REGULATIONS

The details of the regulations are as follows:

Regulation 1 Cites the regulations as the Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Regulations 2000 (No. 2)

Regulation 2 The Regulations commence on gazettal.

Regulation 3 Schedule 1 amends the Telecommunications (Interception) Regulations 1987.

Item 1 of Schedule 1 substitutes Regulation 3 with an updated list of the prescribed forms.

Item 2 of Schedule 1 substitutes schedules 3, 3A, 4, 4A and 5 with a new schedule 3 that contains forms 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.

Form 1 provides for the form of telecommunications service warrants in relation to class 1 offences. The form of warrant has been re-drafted in plain English. Authority under the warrant may be exercised by any officer or staff member of the applicant agency, or another agency, to whom an approval under subsection 55(3) of the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979 applies in relation to the warrant, or the class of warrants to which it belongs.

Form. 2 provides for the form of warrant for named person warrants in relation to class 1 offences. The form of warrant has been amended so that it is in a format consistent with the other warrants.

Form 3 provides for the form of telecommunications service warrants in relation to class 2 offences. The form of warrant has been re-drafted in plain English. Authority under the warrant may be exercised by any officer or staff member of the applicant agency, or another agency, to whom an approval under subsection 55(3) of the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979 applies in relation to the warrant, or the class of warrants to which it belongs.

Form 4 provides for the form of warrant for named person warrants in relation to class 2 offences. The form of warrant has been amended so that it is in a format consistent with the other warrants. The word "only" has been added to sub-section 2(e) of the authorisation to clarify that the list of matters to be considered for the purpose of that sub-section is an exclusive list.

Form 5 provides for the form of warrant for entry on premises and interception of communications. The form of warrant has been re-drafted in plain English. Authority under the warrant may be exercised by any officer or staff member of the applicant agency, or another agency, to whom an approval under subsection 55(3) of the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979 applies in relation to the warrant, or the class of warrants to which it belongs. Form 5 prescribes the form of warrants with respect to entry onto premises for warrants on a single telecommunications service. No form. of warrant is prescribed for entry onto premises with respect to a named person warrants.

 

Overview

The Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Regulations 2000 (No. 2), enacted to align with the Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2000, address the need for updated warrant forms under the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979. These regulations were issued under the authority of the Attorney-General and aim to streamline the warrant process by redrafting them in plain English, ensuring consistency across all warrant types, and enabling officers from other agencies to conduct interceptions when appropriately delegated. The objective is to facilitate a more efficient and clear process for obtaining warrants, while maintaining the integrity and legal requirements of telecommunications interceptions. These regulations commenced upon gazettal and serve to amend the existing Telecommunications (Interception) Regulations 1987 by updating the forms of various warrants to reflect the legislative changes and improve accessibility and understanding.

Scope and Application

The Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Regulations 2000 (No. 2) primarily amend the form of warrants under the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979 to accommodate certain operational changes and clarity in language. These regulations apply to authorised agencies, such as law enforcement and intelligence agencies, which are permitted to issue warrants for the interception of telecommunications in relation to criminal investigations, particularly those involving serious offences. The regulations pertain to the Commonwealth of Australia, aligning with the federal legislative framework. They do not introduce new exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds but update the existing warrant forms to ensure consistency and clarity in legal drafting. Furthermore, these regulations facilitate the delegation of interception duties to officers of another agency, provided the necessary approvals are in place under section 55 of the Act. This extension of authority through subordinate instruments ensures that the application of the Act is comprehensive and adaptable to modern investigative needs.

Key Provisions

The Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Regulations 2000 (No. 2) primarily serve to revise the form and content of warrants under the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979. These regulations amend the existing forms to ensure they are consistent in style and content across different types of warrants. For example, Section 45 warrants, which relate to telecommunications service warrants for class 1 offences, are now re-drafted in plain English (Regulation 3, Item 1, Schedule 1). Similarly, Section 46 warrants, which pertain to telecommunications service warrants for class 2 offences, have been updated to align with the new drafting style (Regulation 3, Item 2, Schedule 1). Furthermore, the forms for named person warrants (Sections 45A and 46A) have been updated to ensure uniformity across all warrant types (Regulation 3, Item 3 and 4, Schedule 1). Section 48 warrants, which pertain to warrants for entry onto premises, have also been re-drafted to ensure they are consistent with the other warrant types (Regulation 3, Item 5, Schedule 1). The regulations impose several obligations on the parties involved in the issuance and execution of these warrants. Firstly, agencies seeking to issue warrants must ensure that the forms prescribed in the regulations are followed meticulously. This includes providing all necessary details and justifications as required by the updated warrant forms. Additionally, any officer or staff member authorised to execute the warrant must have the appropriate approval under subsection 55(3) of the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979, ensuring that only qualified personnel can carry out the interceptions (Regulation 3, Item 1, Schedule 1). Agencies must also ensure that any delegations of authority to officers of other agencies are properly documented and authorised, as per section 55 of the Act. Breach of the provisions of these regulations can lead to serious legal consequences. Although the specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the explanatory statement, it is implied that non-compliance with the warrant requirements and the conditions for issuing and executing warrants could lead to criminal or civil penalties. Given the sensitive nature of telecommunications interception, any failure to adhere to the prescribed forms and conditions could potentially result in legal action against the responsible parties, including fines and imprisonment for individuals found guilty of unauthorised interception. The exact penalties would be determined by the courts based on the specific breaches and the circumstances of each case.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
National Security Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Delegation & Approval

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.