Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act (No. 2) 1984

Legislation au C2004A02980 Not in force Act

Legislation content

Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act (No. 2) 1984

No. 116 of 1984

 

An Act to amend the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979

[Assented to 17 October 1984]

BE IT ENACTED by the Queen, and the Senate and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia, as follows:

Short title, &c.

1. (1) This Act may be cited as the Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act (No. 2) 1984.

(2) The Telecommunications (Interception) Act 19791 is in this Act referred to as the Principal Act.

Commencement

2. This Act shall come into operation on the day on which it receives the Royal Assent.

3. After section 7a of the Principal Act the following sections are inserted:

Documents may be given to Stewart Royal Commission, Commissioner of Public Complaints of New South Wales or the National Crime Authority

7b. (1) Nothing in this Act prevents any documents that have been or are in the possession of Ian Douglas Temby for the purposes of, or in connection


with, the performance of his functions as a Special Prosecutor pursuant to his appointment dated 21 February 1984 under sub-section 5 (1) of the Special Prosecutors Act 1982 from being given by, or with the authority of, the Attorney-General to any or all of the following:

(a) the Honourable Donald Gerard Stewart, being the person appointed by the Governor of the State of New South Wales by Letters Patent dated 24 June 1981 to be a Commissioner to make inquiry into certain matters and by the Administrator of the Government of the Commonwealth by Letters Patent dated 25 June 1981 to be a Commissioner to make inquiry into certain matters;

(b) the Commissioner of Public Complaints appointed under the Commissioner of Public Complaints Act, 1984 of New South Wales;

(c) the National Crime Authority.

(2) If a document referred to in sub-section (1) is given to a Commissioner referred to in paragraph (1) (a) or (b) or the National Crime Authority, the Commissioner or Authority shall consider whether the document is an authentic record of the matters purported to be recorded in the document and—

(a) in the case of the Commissioner referred to in paragraph (1) (a)—whether the document is capable of being the subject of, and is appropriate to be dealt with in the course of, the inquiry referred to in that paragraph;

(b) in the case of the Commissioner referred to in paragraph (1) (b)—whether the document is capable of being the subject of, and is appropriate to be dealt with as, a complaint under the State Act referred to in that paragraph; or

(c) in the case of the National Crime Authority—whether the document is or may be relevant to matters with which the Authority is concerned,

and may, for the purpose of considering those matters, make such use of the document as the Commissioner or the Authority, as the case may be, thinks fit.

(3) If a document referred to in sub-section (1) is given to the Commissioner referred to in paragraph (1) (a) and the Commissioner is satisfied as to the matters mentioned in sub-section (2), he may make use of the document for the purposes of any inquiry referred to in that paragraph and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, he may—

(a) show the document to a person giving evidence in the course of the inquiry;

(b) include matter contained in the document in any report by him of the results of the inquiry; and

(c) make such other use of the document as he considers appropriate for the purpose of identifying the person who made the document and the circumstances in which the document was made.

(4) If a document referred to in sub-section (1) is given to the Commissioner referred to in paragraph (1) (b) and the Commissioner is


satisfied as to the matters mentioned in sub-section (2), the Commissioner may make use of the document for the purposes of the performance of the Commissioners functions under the State Act referred to in that paragraph in relation to the document and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Commissioner may—

(a) show the document to a person giving evidence to the Commissioner in the course of the performance of those functions;

(b) include matter contained in the document in any report made, or information furnished, by the Commissioner under that State Act in relation to the performance of those functions or in an annual report made by the Commissioner; and

(c) make such other use of the document as the Commissioner considers appropriate for the purpose of identifying the person who made the document and the circumstances in which the document was made.

(5) If a document referred to in sub-section (1) is given to the National Crime Authority and the Authority is satisfied as to the matters mentioned in sub-section (2), the Authority may make use of the document for the purposes of the performance of the Authoritys functions, and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Authority may—

(a) show the document to a person giving evidence to the Authority;

(b) subject to any relevant restrictions provided by the National Crime Authority Act 1984, include matter contained in the document in any report made, or information furnished, by the Authority in the performance of its functions; and

(c) make such other use of the document as the Authority considers appropriate for the purpose of identifying the person who made the document and the circumstances in which the document was made.

Documents or information may be given to Law Enforcement Agencies, &c.

7c. (1) It is hereby declared for the avoidance of doubt that a person who has possession of a document or information that the person suspects on reasonable grounds to be evidence of the commission or proposed commission of an offence against sub-section 7 (1) may give the document or information to the Attorney-General, the Director of Public Prosecutions, the Commissioner of Police or the National Crime Authority.

(2) If a document or information that is or may be evidence of the commission or proposed commission of an offence against sub-section 7 (1) has, whether before or after the commencement of this section, been given to the Attorney-General, the Director of Public Prosecutions, the Commissioner of Police or the National Crime Authority, use may be made of the document or information for the purpose of inquiring into whether an offence against sub-section 7 (1) has been or is proposed to be committed or for the purposes of a prosecution in respect of such an offence.

(3) A reference in this section to an offence against sub-section 7 (1) includes a reference to an offence against—

(a) section 6, 7 or 7a of the Crimes Act 1914; or

(b) sub-section 86 (1) of that Act by virtue of paragraph (a) of that last-mentioned sub-section,

being an offence that relates to an offence against sub-section 7 (1) of this Act.

(4) This section has effect notwithstanding sub-section 7 (4)..

 

NOTE

1. No. 114, 1979, as amended. For previous amendments, see No. 181, 1979; Nos. 114 and 116, 1983; and No. 6, 1984.

Overview

The Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act (No. 2) 1984 was enacted to amend the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979, addressing issues related to the interception of telecommunications for investigative purposes. This amendment was introduced to provide clarity and additional authority in the use of intercepted documents and information by various law enforcement and investigative bodies. The Act was enacted by the Queen, the Senate, and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia, with a clear policy objective of facilitating the sharing of relevant intercepted information among authorised agencies to ensure effective investigation and prosecution of telecommunications-related offences. The Act came into operation on the day it received Royal Assent, allowing for immediate implementation of its provisions.

Scope and Application

The Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act (No. 2) 1984 amends the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979 and applies to individuals and entities involved in telecommunications within the Commonwealth of Australia. The Act allows the Attorney-General to authorise the sharing of documents related to the functions of a Special Prosecutor with the Honourable Donald Gerard Stewart, the Commissioner of Public Complaints of New South Wales, and the National Crime Authority, subject to certain conditions. Specifically, the recipients must assess the authenticity and relevance of the documents before using them for their respective inquiries or investigations. Additionally, the Act permits individuals in possession of documents or information that may constitute evidence of an offence related to telecommunications interception to submit these to the Attorney-General, the Director of Public Prosecutions, the Commissioner of Police, or the National Crime Authority, for the purposes of investigation or prosecution. This provision underscores the importance of prompt action in addressing potential violations of telecommunications interception laws.

Key Provisions

The Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act (No. 2) 1984 amends the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979. Section 7b of the amended Act allows documents in the possession of Ian Douglas Temby, the Special Prosecutor, to be transferred to specific authorities, including the Honourable Donald Gerard Stewart, the Commissioner of Public Complaints of New South Wales, and the National Crime Authority. The authorities are required to verify the authenticity of the documents and determine their relevance to their respective functions before using them. For example, the Honourable Donald Gerard Stewart may use the documents to show to witnesses, include in reports, or for other purposes as deemed appropriate. Similarly, the Commissioner of Public Complaints may use the documents to show to witnesses, include in reports, or for other functions as appropriate. The National Crime Authority may use the documents to show to witnesses, include in reports, or for other functions as appropriate. The Act imposes obligations on the parties it governs. The person holding the documents must transfer them to the relevant authorities. The authorities must verify the authenticity of the documents and determine their relevance to their functions before using them. They must use the documents for the specified purposes, such as showing to witnesses or including in reports, or for other functions as appropriate. These obligations are intended to ensure that the documents are used appropriately and for the intended purposes. There are no explicit penalties or consequences for breach of the Act. However, the Act states that it has effect notwithstanding sub-section 7(4), which suggests that the provisions of the Act are intended to override any conflicting provisions in other laws. This means that the authorities may use the documents even if there are other laws that would normally prevent them from doing so. The Act also includes a provision that allows the use of documents or information that are or may be evidence of the commission or proposed commission of an offence against sub-section 7(1), which includes offences related to the interception of telecommunications. This suggests that the authorities may use the documents to investigate and prosecute such offences.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Criminal Law
Instrument
Act
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.