Telecommunications (Approved Auditors and Auditing Requirements) Determination 2006

Administered by Department of Communications and the Arts

Legislation au F2006L00924 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

Telecommunications (Approved Auditors and Auditing Requirements) Determination 2006

as amended

made under subsection 136C(5) of the

Telecommunications Act 1997

This compilation was prepared on 29 May 2014

taking into account amendments up to Telecommunications (Approved Auditors and Auditing Requirements) Determination Variation 2014 (No 1)

 

Prepared by the Australian Communications and Media Authority

1 Name of Determination

  This Determination is the Telecommunications (Approved Auditors and Auditing Requirements) Determination 2006.

2 Commencement

  This Determination commences on the day after it is registered.

3 Definitions

  In this Determination:

  Act means the Telecommunications Act 1997;

  refundable cost has the meaning given by section 136E of the Act; and

  statement of costs means a written statement of the kind referred to in subparagraph 136C(1)(e)(i) or subparagraph 136C(3A)(e)(i) of the Act.

Note   ACMA is defined in section 7 of the Act.

4 Purpose of Determination

  Under subsection 136C(5) of the Act, the ACMA may make a determination specifying:

 (a) the persons who are to be approved auditors; and

 (b) the requirements that are to be approved auditing requirements;

for the purposes of subparagraph 136C(1)(e)(iii) and subparagraph 136C(3A)(e)(iii) of the Act.

5 Approved auditors

  For paragraph 136C(5)(a) of the Act, an approved auditor is a person who is a practising member of:

 (a) the Australian Society of Certified Practicing Accountants (CPA Australia); or

 (b) the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Australia (ICAA).

6 Approved auditing requirements

  For paragraph 136C(5)(b) of the Act, the approved auditing requirements are:

 (a)  a statement of costs must only include costs that are refundable costs; and

 (b) each of the costs listed in a statement of costs must be accurate and supported by relevant documentary evidence demonstrating that the costs have been incurred.

___________________________________________________________________
Note

  All legislative instruments and compilations are registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments kept under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. See http://www.frli.gov.au.
___________________________________________________________________________

Notes to the Telecommunications (Approved Auditors and Auditing Requirements) Determination 2006

Note 1

The Telecommunications (Approved Auditors and Auditing Requirements) Determination 2006 (in force under subsection 136C(5) of the Telecommunications Act 1997) as shown in this compilation is amended as indicated in the Tables below.

Table of Instruments

Title

Date of FRLI registration

Date of
commencement

Application, saving or
transitional provisions

Telecommunications (Approved Auditors and Auditing Requirements) Determination 2006

 

24 March 2006

(see F2006L00924)

25 March 2006

___

Telecommunications (Approved Auditors and Auditing Requirements) Determination Variation 2011 (No 1)

 

5 October 2011

(see F2011L02024)

6 October 2011

___

Telecommunications (Approved Auditors and Auditing Requirements) Determination Variation 2014 (No 1)

 

20 May 2014

(see F2014L00570)

21 May 2014

___

Table of Amendments

ad. = added or inserted      am. = amended      rep. = repealed      rs. = repealed and substituted

Provision affected

How affected

 

 

S. 3.................

rs. 2011 No.1

am. 2014 No.1

S. 4.................

am. 2011 No. 1; 2014 No.1

S. 6.................

rs. 2011 No. 1

 

 

Overview

The Telecommunications (Approved Auditors and Auditing Requirements) Determination 2006 was enacted under the authority of the Telecommunications Act 1997. This legislation was introduced to address the need for specific auditing requirements for telecommunications services, ensuring that cost statements submitted to the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) are accurate and justifiable. The determination was made by the ACMA and outlines the criteria for approved auditors, who must be practising members of the Australian Society of Certified Practicing Accountants or the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Australia. Furthermore, it sets out the auditing requirements, mandating that only refundable costs are to be included in a statement of costs and that all costs listed must be accurate and supported by relevant documentation. This determination helps to maintain the integrity of cost reporting within the telecommunications sector, thereby ensuring transparency and accountability.

Scope and Application

The Telecommunications (Approved Auditors and Auditing Requirements) Determination 2006, as amended, applies to the approval of auditors and the establishment of auditing requirements for the purposes of the Telecommunications Act 1997. It specifies that approved auditors must be practising members of either the Australian Society of Certified Practicing Accountants (CPA Australia) or the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Australia (ICAA). The approved auditing requirements outlined in the Determination mandate that any statement of costs submitted must include only refundable costs and that each cost listed must be accurate and supported by relevant documentary evidence. This Determination is applicable nationally, covering all telecommunications entities operating within Australia. The Determination does not explicitly provide for exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds, but it does extend its application through subordinate instruments such as variations, which have been used to amend the original Determination over time. These amendments, as seen in the Telecommunications (Approved Auditors and Auditing Requirements) Determination Variation 2011 (No 1) and the Telecommunications (Approved Auditors and Auditing Requirements) Determination Variation 2014 (No 1), ensure that the requirements remain current and relevant to the evolving telecommunications landscape.

Key Provisions

The Telecommunications (Approved Auditors and Auditing Requirements) Determination 2006 (the Determination) is made under subsection 136C(5) of the Telecommunications Act 1997 and specifies the approved auditors and auditing requirements for the purposes of subparagraphs 136C(1)(e)(iii) and 136C(3A)(e)(iii) of the Act. The Determination commenced on 25 March 2006, with subsequent variations in 2011 and 2014. The Determination identifies approved auditors and sets out the requirements for auditing in the telecommunications sector. Approved auditors under this Determination are those who are practising members of the Australian Society of Certified Practicing Accountants (CPA Australia) or the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Australia (ICAA) (section 5). The approved auditing requirements state that a statement of costs must only include costs that are refundable costs (section 6(a)), and each of the costs listed in a statement of costs must be accurate and supported by relevant documentary evidence demonstrating that the costs have been incurred (section 6(b)). Entities and individuals subject to the Determination must comply with the approved auditing requirements when preparing and submitting a statement of costs to the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA). This includes ensuring that only refundable costs are included and that all costs are accurately supported by relevant documentary evidence. Approved auditors must also adhere to the professional standards and ethical requirements of their respective accounting bodies. Breach of the Determination’s provisions could result in various consequences depending on the specific breach. For instance, inaccurate or unsupported statements of costs could lead to regulatory action by the ACMA, which may include fines or other enforcement measures. Additionally, if an individual or entity fails to comply with the approved auditing requirements, they may face penalties under the Telecommunications Act 1997, which could include substantial fines. The exact penalties are not specified within the Determination itself but are outlined in the primary Act. The seriousness of the breach will determine the magnitude of the penalty imposed.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Licensing & Registration

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.