Telecommunications (Approved Auditor) Determination 2010

Administered by Department of Communications and the Arts

Legislation au F2010L02495 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

Telecommunications (Approved Auditor) Determination 2010

 

Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999

 

The Telecommunications (Approved Auditor) Determination 2010 (the Determination) is made by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (the ACMA) pursuant to subsection 8F(1) of the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 (the Act).

 

The Determination specifies the class of persons who are approved auditors for the purposes of Part 2 of the Act.

 

Legislative Provisions

 

Subsection 8F(1) of the Act provides that a reference in Part 2 of the Act to an approved auditor is a reference to a person included in a class of persons specified in a written determination made by the ACMA for the purposes of section 8F.

 

Subsection 20D(1) of the Act provides that an eligible revenue return given to the ACMA must be accompanied by a report of an approved auditor.

 

Subsection 20K(1) of the Act provides that a claim for levy credit must be accompanied by a report of an approved auditor.

 

The Determination is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

 

Consultation

 

On 22 July 2010, the ACMA commenced a four week public consultation process which included advising all telecommunications carriers that held licences on 30 June 2010 of the proposed Determination and inviting comments.  This advice stated the basis of the Determination, and advised that the Determination would specify:

  • persons who by reason of subsection 1281(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 are taken to be registered as auditors (Auditors-General);
  • companies registered under Part 9.2A of the Corporations Act 2001 and named in the Register of Authorised Audit Companies provided for in section 1299E of that Act (authorised audit companies); and
  •  persons registered as an auditor under Part 9.2 of the Corporations Act 2001 and named in the Register of Auditors provided for in section 1285 of that Act (registered auditors);

as the class of persons specified for the purposes of section 8F of the Act.

 

Details of the proposed Determination and of the consultation process were made available on the ACMA website. 

 

The ACMA considered all responses made during the consultation process. The majority of the responses received during the consultation process were supportive of the making of a Determination in the form proposed.


Attachment 1

Notes on the Instrument

 

Section 1 - Name of Determination

 

This section sets out the name of the Determination.

 

Section 2 - Commencement

 

This section provides that the Determination commences on the day after it is registered.

 

Section 3 - Definitions

 

This section sets out the definitions of key terms used in the Determination.  The definitions of Auditor-General, authorised audit company and registered auditor are aligned to these classes as defined in the Corporations Act 2001.

 

Section 4 Meaning of approved auditor

 

This section specifies that an approved auditor must be an Auditor-General, an authorised audit company or a registered auditor.

 

This ensures that an approved auditor has been registered, or is taken to be registered, in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001.

Overview

The Telecommunications (Approved Auditor) Determination 2010 was enacted to provide clarity and certainty regarding the qualifications and registration of auditors under the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999. This legislation was introduced by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) to address the need for a specified class of auditors to ensure compliance with the Act. The primary objective of this Determination is to maintain high standards of auditing within the telecommunications industry, ensuring that all audits conducted are performed by qualified and registered professionals. The Determination was developed following a consultation process, during which the ACMA sought input from relevant stakeholders, including telecommunications carriers, to ensure the Determination met industry needs and expectations. The Determination specifies that approved auditors must be either Auditors-General, authorised audit companies, or registered auditors, all of which are defined in alignment with the Corporations Act 2001. This alignment ensures that the standards set by the Determination are consistent with broader corporate governance and auditing requirements. By specifying these qualifications, the Determination aims to uphold the integrity and reliability of financial reporting within the telecommunications sector, thus protecting consumer interests and maintaining service standards as mandated by the Act.

Scope and Application

The Telecommunications (Approved Auditor) Determination 2010, made by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) under the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999, outlines the criteria for individuals and entities to be recognised as approved auditors. This Determination applies to persons who are registered as auditors under the Corporations Act 2001, including Auditors-General, authorised audit companies, and registered auditors. It specifies that an approved auditor must fall into one of these categories, ensuring they are registered or deemed to be registered according to the Corporations Act 2001. The Determination operates across the Commonwealth of Australia and is designed to ensure that any report of an approved auditor accompanying an eligible revenue return or a claim for levy credit is valid and reliable. The Determination came into effect on the day after its registration and is a legislative instrument under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The ACMA conducted a public consultation process before finalising the Determination, and the majority of the feedback was supportive of its proposed form.

Key Provisions

The Telecommunications (Approved Auditor) Determination 2010 outlines the class of persons recognised as approved auditors under the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999. According to subsection 8F(1) of the Act, the ACMA specifies the individuals or entities qualified as approved auditors. These qualified individuals or entities must be Auditors-General, authorised audit companies, or registered auditors, as defined in the Corporations Act 2001. Specifically, subsection 20D(1) requires that any eligible revenue return submitted to the ACMA must be accompanied by a report from an approved auditor. Similarly, subsection 20K(1) mandates that any claim for a levy credit must also be supported by a report from an approved auditor. The Determination imposes clear obligations on the parties it governs. Telecommunications carriers and other entities must ensure that any revenue return or levy credit claim they submit to the ACMA is accompanied by a report from an approved auditor, as specified. This requirement ensures that all financial and compliance reporting is verified by qualified and registered professionals, thereby maintaining the integrity and reliability of the information submitted to the ACMA. The approved auditors must adhere to the standards and criteria set out in the Corporations Act 2001, ensuring their qualifications and registrations are current and valid. Failure to comply with the requirements of the Determination can result in significant consequences. Under the Act, non-compliance may lead to civil or criminal penalties. While specific penalties are not detailed in the Determination itself, breaches of related provisions in the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 can incur substantial fines. For instance, under section 224 of the Act, an individual or entity found to have contravened certain provisions may be liable to a penalty of up to $50,000 for each offence. In cases of serious or repeated breaches, the penalties can escalate significantly, reflecting the importance of compliance with the Act’s requirements.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Consumer Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.