EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument 0500857
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Subsection 269SD(2) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that, in making a TCO, there has been a transcription error in the description of goods the subject of the TCO including the tariff classification that is stated in the TCO to apply to the goods, the CEO may:
− make an order revoking the TCO; and
− make a new TCO in respect of goods that corrects the error.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Instrument No 0500857 was made on 19 January 2005. It revokes TCO 0411819 and makes TCO 0500857 because of a certain transcription error.
Consultation
No consultation was undertaken since the change is minor or machinery nature and does not substantially alter existing arrangements.
Commencement
Subsection 269SD(3) provides that the order revoking the TCO has effect from the day on which the TCO came into force and the new TCO has effect from the revocation of the old TCO.
Subsection 269SD(6) provides that section 269SD has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0500857 revoked 0411819 and made new TCO 0500857 on 19 January 2005.
Overview
The Tariff Concession Instrument 0500857, enacted in 2005 under the Customs Act 1901, addresses the need to correct errors in the description of goods subject to Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. This instrument was introduced to ensure that TCOs accurately reflect the intended tariff classification of the goods, thereby maintaining the integrity of the tariff concession scheme. The instrument revokes the previous TCO 0411819 and introduces a new TCO 0500857 to correct a transcription error identified in the description of the goods and their tariff classification. No consultation was deemed necessary for this minor, machinery-related change. The policy objective is to maintain the accuracy and effectiveness of the tariff concession scheme by correcting errors promptly and efficiently, ensuring that the correct tariff concessions are applied to the appropriate goods.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, specifically under Part XVA, establishes a framework for the creation and revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. This legislation applies to any individual or entity seeking to import goods into Australia that may qualify for a lower rate of customs duty as specified by a TCO. The Act's provisions ensure that a TCO can be implemented when, on the date of application, the goods in question are not produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business, aligning with the core criteria stipulated under sections 269C and 269P of the Act. Furthermore, if the CEO identifies a transcription error in the description or tariff classification of the goods within a TCO, they are authorised under subsection 269SD(2) to revoke the existing TCO and issue a corrected one. This authority extends nationally, impacting all importers of goods subject to the concessions. The instrument, Tariff Concessions Instrument No. 0500857, which revoked TCO 0411819 and issued new TCO 0500857 on 19 January 2005, exemplifies this process, addressing a minor transcription error without necessitating consultation due to its limited scope. The new TCO's effective date is tied to the revocation of the previous order, with the changes taking effect despite the restrictions imposed by section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, which generally prohibits retrospective legislative instruments.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concession Instrument 0500857 operates under the Customs Act 1901, specifically targeting sections 269C and 269P (1). This instrument revokes Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0411819 and introduces TCO 0500857 due to a transcription error in the original order. A TCO is a directive issued by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs that applies a lower rate of customs duty to certain goods, provided no substitutable goods are produced in Australia at the time the application is made (2). This specific instrument corrects an error in the description of goods and their tariff classification, ensuring that the correct goods are subject to the intended lower duty rate.
The obligations imposed by this Act on the relevant parties include ensuring that applications for TCOs are made with accurate and precise descriptions of goods and their tariff classifications (3). The CEO of Customs has the authority to review and, if necessary, revoke a TCO upon discovering a transcription error. The CEO can also issue a new TCO to correct the error, ensuring that the intended tariff concessions are accurately applied. The Act mandates that these processes are conducted in accordance with the statutory requirements set out in the Customs Act 1901.
Under this Act, there are specific provisions for addressing errors in TCOs. If the CEO determines that a TCO contains a transcription error, they have the authority to revoke the existing TCO and issue a new one that corrects the error (4). This ensures that the intended tariff concessions are correctly applied without any discrepancies. The Act provides a mechanism for the CEO to correct errors and maintain the integrity of the tariff concession scheme.
The penalties for breaches of the Customs Act 1901, including errors in TCOs, can be severe. While the specific penalties for errors in TCOs are not detailed in the provided text, breaches of the Customs Act generally carry significant fines and potential criminal charges (5). For example, knowingly making a false statement in an application for a TCO could lead to substantial penalties, both civil and criminal. The exact penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, as well as any relevant case law and statutory provisions.