EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 82/2007
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.
Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:
− that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and
− that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Australian Weaving Mills Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 0613067 which covers Bed Linen.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 82/2007 was made on 17 May 2007. It revokes TCO 0613067 as the CEO is satisfied that Australian Weaving Mills Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Consultation
Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.
Commencement
Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged. Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.82/2007 revoked 0613067 on 17 May 2007.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 provides for the establishment and revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) through which lower rates of customs duty are applied to certain goods. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 82/2007, made in 2007, addresses the revocation of a TCO pertaining to Bed Linen, following a request by Australian Weaving Mills Pty Ltd. This instrument was enacted to ensure that if domestic production of substitutable goods emerges, the original tariff concessions are appropriately adjusted. The revocation was authorised by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, in accordance with the requirements set out in the Customs Act 1901, and took effect on the date the revocation request was lodged, reflecting the legislative intent to swiftly respond to changes in domestic production capacity.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, specifically under Part XVA, governs the making and revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which apply a lower rate of customs duty to particular goods. This scheme allows the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to establish and revoke TCOs based on applications that meet core criteria, such as the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia at the time of application. A TCO remains in effect unless revoked, and section 269SB of the Act permits a producer of substitutable goods to request the CEO to revoke a TCO if they believe the concession is unwarranted. The CEO is mandated by subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act to revoke a TCO if satisfied that the requesting party is a producer of substitutable goods and that, if the TCO were not in force, it would not have been granted. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 82/2007, made on 17 May 2007, revoked TCO 0613067, which pertains to Bed Linen, as the CEO confirmed Australian Weaving Mills Pty Ltd as a producer of substitutable goods and determined that the TCO would not have been issued under the current circumstances. The revocation takes immediate effect from the date the revocation request was lodged, notwithstanding the prohibition on retrospective legislative instruments under section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 82/2007, made under section 269SC(1) and (3) of the Customs Act 1901, revokes Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0613067, which pertains to Bed Linen. This revocation was carried out because the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs is satisfied that Australian Weaving Mills Pty Ltd is a producer of substitutable goods, and if the TCO had not been in force, it would not have been made. This process follows the Act's stipulations that a TCO applies a lower rate of customs duty to goods, but it can be revoked if a producer of substitutable goods requests its revocation and meets certain criteria.
Under the Customs Act 1901, the CEO has the authority to make and revoke TCOs. For a TCO to be made, the application must meet core criteria, such as no substitutable goods being produced in Australia at the time of application. Conversely, for a TCO to be revoked, the CEO must be convinced that the requesting party is a producer of substitutable goods and that the TCO would not have been made if the request had been made on the day the original application for the TCO was lodged. Furthermore, the CEO is obligated to publish a notice in the Gazette as soon as practicable after receiving a revocation request, as per section 269SC(1A) of the Act. This ensures transparency and informs the public of the revocation process.
The obligations imposed by the Customs Act 1901 on parties include the requirement for producers of substitutable goods to notify the CEO of their production status if they wish to revoke an existing TCO. The CEO, in turn, has the duty to evaluate the request based on the criteria outlined in the Act. If satisfied, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO, and this order comes into effect on the day the revocation request was lodged, as stipulated by subsection 269SC(6). This process ensures that the customs duty structure is dynamic and responsive to changes in domestic production capabilities.
The Customs Act 1901 outlines penalties and consequences for non-compliance with its provisions. However, the specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breaches of the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 82/2007 are not detailed in the provided explanatory statement. Generally, breaches of the Customs Act 1901 can result in significant penalties, including fines and imprisonment, depending on the severity and intent of the breach. The Act’s overarching framework aims to protect and regulate the customs duty system, ensuring that it operates fairly and efficiently within the Australian economy.