Tariff Concession Revocation Order 77/2011

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2011L01245 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 77/2011

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.

Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.

Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:

               that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and

               that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.

Denning Manufacturing Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 0829207 which covers bus chassis.

Instrument

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 77/2011 was made on 9 July 2010. It revokes TCO 0829207 as the CEO is satisfied that Denning Manufacturing Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.

Consultation

Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.

Commencement

Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged.  Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.  Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.77/2011, TCO 0829207, was revoked on 9 July 2010 with the Revocation date of effect as from 11 May 2010.

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901, which was enacted by the Parliament of Australia, provides for a scheme where Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) can be made and subsequently revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. This legislation allows for reduced rates of customs duty on goods covered by a TCO, provided that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia at the time of application. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 77/2011 was introduced to address the specific issue of revoking TCO 0829207, which covers bus chassis, at the request of Denning Manufacturing Pty Ltd, a producer of substitutable goods. The policy objective as stated in the Act is to ensure that if a TCO is revoked, it would not have been made if the revocation request had been lodged on the original application date. The Instrument was made on 9 July 2010 and came into effect from 11 May 2010, reflecting the CEO's satisfaction that Denning Manufacturing Pty Ltd qualified as a producer of substitutable goods and that the TCO would not have been issued under the current circumstances.

Scope and Application

The Customs Act 1901, as outlined in Part XVA, pertains to the establishment and revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. The Act applies to individuals and entities seeking or contesting tariff concessions on imported goods. Specifically, it targets those who apply for a TCO or seek its revocation, focusing on the production status of substitutable goods in Australia. The Act’s jurisdiction spans the Commonwealth, providing a national framework for customs-related decisions. However, it excludes scenarios where substitutable goods are already produced in Australia. The application and revocation of TCOs are further detailed through subordinate instruments, which can extend or specify the Act's provisions without necessitating amendments to the primary legislation. The revocation of TCO 0829207, concerning bus chassis, exemplifies this process, with the revocation taking effect from the date the request was lodged, notwithstanding the prohibitions on retrospective legislative instruments.

Key Provisions

The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 77/2011, made under the Customs Act 1901, revokes Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0829207, which covered bus chassis. This revocation was prompted by a request from Denning Manufacturing Pty Ltd. Section 269SB of the Act allows a producer of substitutable goods to request the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to revoke a TCO. The CEO must consider such a request and, if satisfied that the conditions outlined in section 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act are met, make an order revoking the TCO. Specifically, the CEO must determine whether the applicant is a producer of substitutable goods and whether the TCO would not have been made had the application been lodged on the date of the revocation request. The obligations imposed by the Act on parties and entities governed by it are significant. For the CEO, the primary obligations include receiving and processing revocation requests in accordance with the Act's provisions. This involves verifying the applicant's status as a producer of substitutable goods and determining whether the conditions for revocation are satisfied. Additionally, the CEO must publish a notice of the request in the Gazette, as mandated by section 269SC(1A) of the Act, which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO in question. This transparency measure ensures that all stakeholders are informed of the proceedings. The consequences of breaching the provisions of the Customs Act 1901, particularly in relation to TCOs and their revocation, can be substantial. While the Act does not explicitly outline specific penalties for breaches related to TCOs, general provisions under the Act may apply. For instance, section 256 of the Act provides that any person who contravenes the Act or any regulations or orders made under it may be liable to a fine. The maximum penalties for serious offences under the Customs Act can include substantial fines and, in some cases, imprisonment. The specific penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, and courts would consider these factors when determining appropriate sanctions.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs & Trade Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Repeal & Amendment
Commencement Provisions
Consultation Requirements

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.