EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 75/2011
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.
Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:
− that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and
− that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Rotary Heat Exchangers Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 1010630 which covers air handling machines.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 75/2011 was made on 10 December 2010. It revokes TCO 1010630 as the CEO is satisfied that Rotary Heat Exchangers Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Consultation
Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.
Commencement
Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged. Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.75/2011, TCO 1010630, was revoked on 10 December 2010 with the Revocation date of effect as from 20 October 2010.
Overview
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 75/2011, enacted under the Customs Act 1901, addresses the issue of revoking tariff concession orders (TCOs) when domestic production of substitutable goods begins. The Act allows for the revocation of TCOs if, upon receiving a request, the Chief Executive Officer of Customs is satisfied that a domestic producer of substitutable goods exists and that the concession would not have been granted had the request been made at the time of the original application. This legislative instrument was introduced by the Parliament of Australia and aims to ensure that tariff concessions do not unfairly benefit importers when domestic production capacity is available. The revocation of TCO 1010630, which covered air handling machines, was made following a request by Rotary Heat Exchangers Pty Ltd, demonstrating the application of the Act in response to changes in domestic production.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 75/2011 applies to the revocation of Tariff Concession Order 1010630 for air handling machines under the Customs Act 1901. This legislation is specifically concerned with the process through which the Chief Executive Officer of Customs may revoke a Tariff Concession Order if certain conditions are met. A Tariff Concession Order applies a lower rate of customs duty to goods, and these concessions can be revoked if it is demonstrated that substitutable goods are being produced in Australia. The instrument is applicable to Rotary Heat Exchangers Pty Ltd, which requested the revocation of TCO 1010630, and to the goods covered by the revoked order. The geographic reach of this legislation is confined to Australia, as it pertains to domestic production and customs duties within the country. The instrument does not specify any exclusions or exemptions, and the revocation takes effect from the date the request was lodged, 20 October 2010, despite any prohibitions on retrospective legislative instruments.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 75/2011 under the Customs Act 1901 (section 269SB) outlines the process and conditions for revoking a Tariff Concession Order (TCO). Specifically, section 269SC(1) and (3) stipulate that the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) must revoke a TCO if satisfied that the applicant is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that, had the TCO not been in force, the CEO would not have made it. This was the case with TCO 1010630, which covered air handling machines, following a request by Rotary Heat Exchangers Pty Ltd. The revocation took effect from 20 October 2010.
The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties involved include a requirement for the CEO to act promptly upon receiving a request for revocation of a TCO. Under section 269SC(1A), the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette as soon as practicable after receiving a revocation request, including the full particulars of the TCO in question. This transparency ensures that all stakeholders are informed of the revocation process. Additionally, section 269SC(6) specifies that the revocation order comes into force on the day the revocation request was lodged, providing clarity on the timeline for such actions.
Failure to comply with the requirements set out in the Customs Act 1901 may result in various civil or criminal consequences. Although the specific penalties for breaches are not detailed in the explanatory statement, it is understood that non-compliance could potentially lead to legal action. The maximum penalties for breaches of the Customs Act could include fines and imprisonment, depending on the nature and severity of the breach. The precise penalties would be determined based on the specific provisions of the Act that are contravened.
The explanatory statement also highlights the commencement provisions under section 269SC(6) and section 239SD(8), which ensure that the revocation of a TCO takes effect from the date the revocation request was lodged, notwithstanding the prohibitions in section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 against certain retrospective legislative instruments. This legal framework ensures that the revocation process is both timely and legally sound, respecting the legislative constraints while fulfilling its objectives.