EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 74/2011
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.
Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:
− that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and
− that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.
MHG Glass Pty Limited requested that the CEO revoke TCO 1009474 which covers safety glass.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 74/2011 was made on 15 July 2010. It revokes TCO 1009474 as the CEO is satisfied that MHG Glass Pty Limited is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Consultation
Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.
Commencement
Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged. Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.74/2011, TCO 1009474, was revoked on 15 July 2010 with the Revocation date of effect as from 20 May 2010.
Overview
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 74/2011 was enacted to address the issue of tariff concessions under the Customs Act 1901. Specifically, the instrument revokes Tariff Concession Order 1009474, which had applied to safety glass. The Customs Act 1901 established a framework allowing the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to create and revoke Tariff Concession Orders, with lower customs duty rates applying to goods covered by these orders. MHG Glass Pty Limited requested the revocation of TCO 1009474, arguing that they were a producer of substitutable goods and that the original order should not have been made. The instrument revokes the concession as the CEO found MHG Glass Pty Limited to be a producer of substitutable goods and concluded that, had the current situation existed at the time of the original application, the concession would not have been granted. The instrument was issued by the relevant authority under the Customs Act 1901 and came into effect from the date the revocation request was lodged, in compliance with the legislative framework and despite any retrospective legislative restrictions.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 74/2011, made under the Customs Act 1901, pertains to the revocation of a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) that previously provided lower customs duty rates on safety glass. This instrument applies specifically to MHG Glass Pty Limited, a producer of substitutable goods in relation to safety glass, and the Chief Executive Officer of Customs who is responsible for making and revoking TCOs. The revocation is based on the criteria that MHG Glass Pty Limited is now producing the goods domestically, which meets the conditions for the TCO to be revoked as outlined in sections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act. The geographic and jurisdictional reach of this Act is national, as it operates under the Commonwealth of Australia's customs regulations. Any exclusions or exemptions from the application of this Act are not specified in the explanatory statement. The Act extends its application through subordinate instruments such as the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument, which can alter the tariff concessions in specific circumstances as determined by the CEO of Customs.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 74/2011, as outlined in the Customs Act 1901, addresses the revocation of a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) for specific goods, in this case, safety glass. Under section 269SB, the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) has the authority to revoke a TCO if a producer in Australia claims that they are producing substitutable goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the applicant is indeed producing substitutable goods and that the TCO should not have been issued in the first place, the CEO must revoke the TCO (sections 269SC(1) and (3)).
The CEO's obligations under this Act are to assess the validity of the revocation request, ensuring that the applicant meets the criteria of being a producer of substitutable goods. This involves confirming that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia at the time the original TCO application was lodged and that the CEO would not have made the TCO if the current situation applied (subsections 269SC(1) and (3)). Furthermore, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette as soon as practicable after receiving the request for revocation, detailing the full particulars of the TCO and the reasons for the proposed revocation (subsection 269SC(1A)).
Failure to adhere to the provisions of the Customs Act 1901 can result in various civil or criminal consequences. The Act does not explicitly state penalties for non-compliance in this context, but breaches of the Act generally may lead to fines or imprisonment depending on the severity of the breach. The specific penalties would be determined in accordance with the relevant sections of the Customs Act 1901 or other applicable laws. The revocation of a TCO, as governed by this Instrument, does not inherently create criminal offences but ensures compliance with the conditions set out in the Act for issuing and revoking TCOs.