EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 69/2011
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.
Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:
− that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and
− that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Hofmann Engineering Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 1010349 which covers excavator travel gear shafts.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 69/2011 was made on 13 August 2010. It revokes TCO 1010349 as the CEO is satisfied that Hofmann Engineering Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Consultation
Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.
Commencement
Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged. Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.69/2011, TCO 1010349, was revoked on 13 August 2010 with the Revocation date of effect as from 22 June 2010.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, established a framework for the imposition of customs duties and the granting of tariff concessions to promote trade and economic policy objectives. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 69/2011 addresses the specific issue of revoking tariff concession orders when local production of substitutable goods emerges. This instrument empowers the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to revoke a tariff concession order if satisfied that a local producer of substitutable goods has commenced production and that the tariff concession would not have been granted had the local production been in existence at the time of the original application. Hofmann Engineering Pty Ltd successfully requested the revocation of Tariff Concession Order 1010349, leading to the issuance of the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 69/2011 on 13 August 2010. The revocation took effect from 22 June 2010, ensuring that the tariff concession was appropriately adjusted in response to the emergence of local production capabilities.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 69/2011, made under the Customs Act 1901, applies to the revocation of Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 1010349, which pertains to excavator travel gear shafts. The Act allows for the imposition of lower rates of customs duty on goods covered by a TCO if certain conditions are met, primarily that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia at the time the TCO application is lodged. Hofmann Engineering Pty Ltd, an entity within the scope of this legislation, requested the revocation of TCO 1010349, asserting that they are a producer of substitutable goods. Following the necessary consultation and satisfaction of the criteria under sections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the Chief Executive Officer of Customs revoked TCO 1010349, effective from 22 June 2010. This revocation is geographically and jurisdictionally aligned with the Commonwealth of Australia, as per the provisions of the Customs Act 1901. The revocation is effective from the date of the request, bypassing the usual prohibitions against retrospective legislative instruments as outlined in the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 69/2011, as part of the Customs Act 1901, provides specific provisions for the revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). Under sections 269C and 269P, TCOs are granted if an application meets certain criteria, such as the absence of substitutable goods being produced in Australia on the day the application is lodged. Section 269SB of the Act allows a producer in Australia of substitutable goods to request the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs to revoke a TCO. The CEO is required under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) to revoke the TCO if satisfied that the requester is a producer of substitutable goods and that the TCO would not have been made if the requester had been producing those goods on the day the original application was lodged.
The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties include the requirement for the CEO to publish a notice in the Gazette under subsection 269SC(1A) as soon as practicable after receiving a revocation request. This notice must include a statement of the lodged request and full particulars of the TCO in question. Additionally, the revocation of a TCO, as per subsection 269SC(6), comes into effect on the day the revocation request was lodged, which is distinct from the general prohibition on retrospective legislative instruments under section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, as provided by subsection 269SD(8).
In terms of consequences, while the Act does not explicitly state penalties for non-compliance with its provisions, the revocation of a TCO can have significant economic impacts on businesses that rely on such concessions. The revocation of TCO 1010349 for excavator travel gear shafts, effective from 22 June 2010, would directly affect importers and producers who were benefiting from the tariff concessions previously in place. The immediate effect of the revocation means that the higher rate of customs duty would now apply to the goods, potentially increasing costs and altering competitive dynamics in the market. The revocation instrument, made on 13 August 2010, reflects the CEO's satisfaction that Hofmann Engineering Pty Ltd is a producer of substitutable goods and that the original TCO would not have been issued if this fact had been known at the time of application.