EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 57/2011
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.
Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:
− that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and
− that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Hardi Australia Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 1023211 which covers agricultural boom sprayers.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 57/2011 was made on 29 November 2010. It revokes TCO 1023211 as the CEO is satisfied that Hardi Australia Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Consultation
Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.
Commencement
Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged. Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.57/2011, TCO 1023211, was revoked on 29 November 2010 with the Revocation date of effect as from 6 October 2010.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, provides a framework for the administration of customs and excise, including the establishment of tariff concession orders (TCOs) that allow for reduced customs duty on certain imported goods. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 57/2011 addresses the problem of ensuring that TCOs are revoked when local production of substitutable goods begins, thereby maintaining fair competition and protecting domestic industries. This legislative instrument was introduced to streamline the process of revoking TCOs in response to requests from local producers who can demonstrate the availability of substitutable goods in Australia. The instrument revokes TCO 1023211, which pertained to agricultural boom sprayers, based on the CEO's satisfaction that Hardi Australia Pty Ltd is a producer of substitutable goods and that the TCO would not have been issued under the current circumstances. The revocation took effect from the date the request was lodged, 6 October 2010.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 57/2011, made under the Customs Act 1901, revokes Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 1023211, which pertains to agricultural boom sprayers. The instrument applies to the revocation of tariff concessions, and it specifically concerns the goods that were subject to TCO 1023211. The revocation is applicable to any person or entity affected by the tariff concessions that were previously in place. The instrument operates within the Commonwealth jurisdiction, as it is made under the Customs Act 1901, which is a federal statute. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions in this particular instrument, but the revocation of a TCO is contingent on meeting specific criteria under the Customs Act, such as the absence of substitutable goods being produced in Australia. The scope of the instrument is limited to the revocation of a specific TCO, and it does not extend to other TCOs unless similarly requested and approved by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 57/2011 under the Customs Act 1901 revokes Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 1023211, which pertained to agricultural boom sprayers, as requested by Hardi Australia Pty Ltd. According to section 269C and 269P of the Customs Act, a TCO applies a lower rate of customs duty to specific goods if no substitutable goods are produced in Australia on the date the application for the TCO is lodged. Section 269SB allows a producer of substitutable goods to request the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to revoke the TCO if certain conditions are met. Under section 269SC(1) and (3), the CEO must revoke the TCO if satisfied that the applicant is a producer of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO if the revocation request were the application date.
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 57/2011 imposes obligations on both the CEO and the requesting party, Hardi Australia Pty Ltd. The CEO is obligated to consider the request for revocation and make an order if satisfied of the specified conditions, as outlined in section 269SC(1) and (3). Hardi Australia Pty Ltd must demonstrate that it is a producer of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO on the date of the revocation request. Furthermore, section 269SC(1A) requires the CEO to publish a notice in the Gazette once a revocation request is received, including details of the TCO in question.
Under the Customs Act, breaches of the provisions regarding TCOs do not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences. However, the revocation of a TCO can have significant financial implications for importers who may now face higher customs duties on the affected goods. The revocation date of the instrument is effective from 6 October 2010, as per the provisions in section 269SC(6), which ensures that the revocation has immediate effect from the date the request was lodged, despite the prohibitions in section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 concerning retrospective legislative instruments.