EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 56/2011
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.
Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:
− that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and
− that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Tapex Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 0926748 which covers polypropylene twine.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 56/2011 was made on 28 January 2011. It revokes TCO 0926748 as the CEO is satisfied that Tapex Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Consultation
Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.
Commencement
Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged. Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.56/2011, TCO 0926748, was revoked on 28 January 2011 with the Revocation date of effect as from 29 November 2010.
Overview
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 56/2011 was enacted to address the specific issue of revoking a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) under the Customs Act 1901. This instrument, which was introduced by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) in response to a request from Tapex Pty Ltd, revokes TCO 0926748 that covered polypropylene twine. The Customs Act 1901 allows the CEO to make and revoke TCOs, with the revocation process being triggered when a producer of substitutable goods requests the revocation of an existing TCO. The objective of the instrument is to ensure that the CEO revokes the TCO if satisfied that the applicant is a producer of substitutable goods and that the TCO would not have been made had the request been lodged on the day the original TCO application was submitted. This revocation mechanism is designed to maintain the integrity of the tariff concession scheme by preventing undue benefits to certain producers at the expense of domestic manufacturers.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, as supplemented by the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 56/2011, provides a mechanism for the revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which are designed to grant lower rates of customs duty on specific goods. The Act applies to individuals and entities involved in the production or import of goods subject to these concessions, particularly when a request for revocation is made by a producer of substitutable goods in Australia. The geographic reach of the Act is national, as it pertains to the Customs operations across Australia. The Act includes provisions for the revocation of a TCO if certain conditions are met, such as the absence of production of substitutable goods in Australia on the day the revocation request is lodged and the CEO's satisfaction that they would not have made the TCO if the current circumstances had applied at the time of the initial application. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 56/2011 specifically revoked TCO 0926748 for polypropylene twine, effective from the date the revocation request was lodged, despite legislative constraints on retrospective changes. The revocation process involves mandatory publication of the request details in a Gazette, ensuring transparency and compliance with the statutory requirements.
Key Provisions
The primary operative sections of the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 56/2011 pertain to the revocation of a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) under the Customs Act 1901. Specifically, section 269SB allows a person claiming to be a producer of substitutable goods in Australia to request the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to revoke a TCO. Under sections 269SC(1) and 269SC(3), the CEO must revoke the TCO if satisfied that the requester is a producer of substitutable goods and that, if the TCO were not in force on the day the request was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO. This Instrument revokes TCO 0926748 following a request by Tapex Pty Ltd, as the CEO is satisfied that Tapex Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.
The Act imposes several obligations on parties involved in the process. Firstly, any person claiming to be a producer of substitutable goods must make a formal request to the CEO to revoke the TCO. The CEO, on receiving such a request, must publish a notice in the Gazette stating that a request has been lodged and providing the full particulars of the TCO in question. The CEO must then assess the request against the criteria set out in sections 269SC(1) and 269SC(3) of the Act. If the CEO is satisfied that the conditions for revocation are met, they must make an order revoking the TCO.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the Customs Act 1901, particularly those relating to the revocation of TCOs, may result in civil or criminal consequences. While the explanatory statement does not explicitly detail penalties, breaches of the Customs Act could generally lead to fines, imprisonment, or other civil remedies. The exact penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, as well as any other applicable laws.
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 56/2011 revokes TCO 0926748, effective from 29 November 2010. This revocation follows the CEO's satisfaction that Tapex Pty Ltd is a producer of substitutable goods in Australia and that the CEO would not have made the TCO if the revocation request were made on the day the original TCO application was lodged. The Instrument was made on 28 January 2011, and the CEO's decision to revoke the TCO aligns with the statutory requirements outlined in the Customs Act 1901.