EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 55/2011
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.
Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:
− that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and
− that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Milltech Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 0835477 which covers cold drawn bars.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 55/2011 was made on 11 October 2010. It revokes TCO 0835477 as the CEO is satisfied that Milltech Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Consultation
Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.
Commencement
Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged. Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.55/2011, TCO 0835477, was revoked on 11 October 2010 with the Revocation date of effect as from 18 August 2010.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 governs the administration of customs duties in Australia and includes provisions for the creation and revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). Enacted by the Australian Parliament, this Act aims to ensure fair trade practices by providing tariff concessions to goods not produced domestically. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 55/2011 was introduced to address the need for revoking TCOs when domestic production of substitutable goods commences. The revocation process was designed to protect Australian producers from undue competition, aligning with the policy objective of maintaining a balanced and equitable trade environment. The instrument was made on 11 October 2010, revoking TCO 0835477 after the Chief Executive Officer of Customs was satisfied that a local producer, Milltech Pty Ltd, was producing substitutable goods, thereby fulfilling the statutory criteria for revocation.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901 applies to any person or entity seeking to import goods into Australia, and it facilitates the imposition of customs duties on such goods. Under Part XVA, the Act provides for the creation and revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which apply to specific goods that can benefit from a reduced rate of customs duty. The Act operates on a Commonwealth level and encompasses both the import of goods and the transactions related to them. The scope of the Act is extended by subordinate instruments such as the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument, which detail the specific goods and circumstances under which a TCO may be revoked. In this particular case, Instrument 55/2011 revokes TCO 0835477, concerning cold drawn bars, following a request from Milltech Pty Ltd, a producer of substitutable goods in Australia. The revocation takes effect from the date the request was lodged, which in this instance is 18 August 2010. This revocation occurs in compliance with the legislative requirements set out in the Customs Act 1901, including the mandatory publication of the revocation request in a Gazette.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 55/2011 under the Customs Act 1901 revokes Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0835477, which covered cold drawn bars, following a request by Milltech Pty Ltd. This revocation occurs when the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs is satisfied that Milltech Pty Ltd is a producer of substitutable goods in Australia and that, had the TCO not been in force, it would not have been made in the first place (subsections 269SC(1) and (3)). The revocation order was made on 11 October 2010 and came into effect on 18 August 2010, the day the revocation request was lodged (subsections 269SC(6) and 269SD(8)). This date takes precedence over the prohibition against retrospective legislative instruments as outlined in the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (section 12).
The Customs Act 1901 imposes several obligations on parties involved in TCOs. Section 269C requires that a TCO only be made if, on the day the application for the TCO is lodged, no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269P specifies that a TCO applies to goods that benefit from a lower rate of customs duty. Section 269SB allows any person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods to request the CEO to revoke a TCO. Once a request is received, section 269SC(1A) mandates that the CEO must publish a notice in a Gazette, detailing the request for revocation and the particulars of the TCO in question.
Breaching the provisions of the Customs Act 1901 may result in various consequences. The specific penalties for breaches are not detailed in the explanatory statement but generally, under Australian law, penalties for customs-related offences can include fines and imprisonment. For instance, section 269 of the Customs Act 1901 provides for fines and penalties for fraudulent activities, including false statements or documents. The maximum penalties for such offences can vary widely, but they often include substantial fines and potential imprisonment terms, depending on the severity and nature of the breach. The exact penalties and consequences would need to be referred to in the full text of the Customs Act 1901 and related regulations.