EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 54/2011
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.
Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:
− that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and
− that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Lyondellbasell Australia Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 0804160 which covers polypropylene homopolymer.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 54/2011 was made on 30 November 2010. It revokes TCO 0804160 as the CEO is satisfied that Lyondellbasell Australia Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Consultation
Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.
Commencement
Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged. Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.54/2011, TCO 0804160, was revoked on 30 November 2010 with the Revocation date of effect as from 18 October 2010.
Overview
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 54/2011 was enacted under the Customs Act 1901 to address the specific problem of revoking tariff concession orders in cases where domestic production of substitutable goods emerges post the concession's establishment. This instrument empowers the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to revoke a tariff concession order if it is established that the applicant is a producer of substitutable goods and that the order would not have been made if the current circumstances had existed at the time of the original application. This legislative instrument was introduced by the Australian Government and aims to ensure fair trade practices by preventing undue benefits to importers if local production capabilities develop subsequently. The revocation of TCO 0804160 for polypropylene homopolymer, effective from 18 October 2010, exemplifies this legislative intent, as Lyondellbasell Australia Pty Ltd demonstrated its capacity to produce substitutable goods, thereby fulfilling the criteria for revocation as stipulated in the Customs Act 1901.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 54/2011 is a legislative instrument under the Customs Act 1901, which outlines the process for the revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO). Specifically, this instrument revokes TCO 0804160 concerning polypropylene homopolymer following a request by Lyondellbasell Australia Pty Ltd. The Act applies to any person or entity that engages in the production of goods within Australia that are subject to or potentially subject to a TCO. The scope of the Act is national, as it operates under the Commonwealth jurisdiction. The revocation of TCOs is subject to strict criteria, including the condition that the person requesting the revocation must be a producer of substitutable goods in Australia and that the CEO would not have made the TCO if the request were made on the original application date. The instrument revokes the specified TCO effective from the date the revocation request was lodged, which in this case is 18 October 2010. The Act does not specify any exclusions or exemptions, but its application can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments as necessary.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 54/2011 operates under the Customs Act 1901, specifically targeting Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). This legislation allows the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to make or revoke TCOs, which apply lower rates of customs duty to certain goods. Section 269C and 269P of the Act detail the criteria for establishing TCOs, while section 269SB provides for the revocation of TCOs if a producer in Australia claims to produce substitutable goods. Under sections 269SC(1) and 269SC(3) of the Act, the CEO must revoke a TCO if satisfied that the applicant is a producer of substitutable goods and that the TCO would not have been made if the application was lodged on the day of the revocation request.
The Act imposes specific obligations on parties involved in the tariff concession process. Section 269SC(1A) mandates that the CEO must publish a notice in a Gazette upon receiving a request for TCO revocation, including full particulars of the TCO. Furthermore, section 269SC(6) stipulates that an order revoking a TCO takes effect on the day the revocation request was lodged, despite the general prohibition on retrospective legislative instruments under section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. This ensures that the revocation of TCOs is both transparent and timely, maintaining the integrity of the tariff concession scheme.
The Act also outlines the consequences of non-compliance with its provisions. While specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the explanatory statement, it is implied that any failure to adhere to the requirements of the Act, such as not publishing a notice upon receiving a revocation request, could lead to administrative or legal repercussions. The revocation of TCO 0804160 for polypropylene homopolymer by the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 54/2011, effective from 18 October 2010, underscores the importance of following these legislative directives. This revocation was made possible because Lyondellbasell Australia Pty Ltd satisfied the CEO that it was a producer of substitutable goods and that the TCO would not have been made if the request had been lodged on the day of the application.