EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 5/2011
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.
Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:
− that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and
− that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.
A Plus Plastics Pty Ltd and Award Brands Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 0803926 which covers utility tubs.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 5/2011 was made on 02 June 2010. It revokes TCO 0803926 as the CEO is satisfied that A Plus Plastics Pty Ltd and Award Brands Pty Ltd are producers in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Consultation
Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.
Commencement
Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged. Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.5/2011, TCO 0803926, was revoked on 02 June 2010 with the Revocation date of effect as from 7 April 2010.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was amended to include provisions for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) that provide lower rates of customs duty for certain goods. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 5/2011, made on 02 June 2010, addresses the issue of revoking such concessions when local production of substitutable goods begins. The Chief Executive Officer of Customs revoked TCO 0803926 following requests from A Plus Plastics Pty Ltd and Award Brands Pty Ltd, who demonstrated that they were producers of substitutable goods. This revocation was made in accordance with the requirements set out in sections 269SB, 269SC, and 269SD of the Customs Act 1901, ensuring that the revocation took effect from the date the revocation request was lodged, thereby maintaining the integrity of the legislative process while addressing the specific circumstances of local production.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 5/2011 operates within the framework of the Customs Act 1901, which applies across the Commonwealth of Australia. This legislation is concerned with the revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) that are designed to reduce the rate of customs duty on specific goods. The Act allows the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to revoke a TCO if it is determined that substitutable goods are now being produced in Australia, thereby meeting the core criteria for tariff concessions. The revocation is triggered when a producer in Australia requests the revocation of a TCO, and the CEO is satisfied that the producer is indeed making substitutable goods and that the TCO would not have been issued had the request been made on the original application date. This instrument specifically revokes TCO 0803926, which pertains to utility tubs, based on the application from A Plus Plastics Pty Ltd and Award Brands Pty Ltd. The revocation takes immediate effect from the date the request to revoke the TCO was lodged, despite statutory provisions that typically prevent retrospective legislative actions.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 5/2011 (F2011L01283) under the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) are sections 269SB, 269SC, and 269SD. Section 269SB allows a person claiming to be a producer of substitutable goods in Australia to request the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO) to revoke a Tariff Concession Order (TCO). Sections 269SC(1) and (3) require the CEO to revoke the TCO if satisfied that the applicant is a producer of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO if the application were lodged on the day the revocation request was made. Finally, section 269SD(8) stipulates that the revocation takes effect from the day the request was lodged, notwithstanding certain retrospective legislative prohibitions.
The obligations and requirements imposed by the Act on the parties or entities it governs are quite specific. The CEO must ensure that a TCO is only in place if, on the day an application for such an order is made, no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Furthermore, any person claiming to be a producer of substitutable goods can request the CEO to revoke a TCO. The CEO is then obligated to consider such a request and, if satisfied with the conditions outlined in sections 269SC(1) and (3), to revoke the TCO. Additionally, under section 269SC(1A), the CEO must publish a notice in a Gazette as soon as practicable after receiving a revocation request, detailing the full particulars of the TCO in question.
In terms of consequences for breaches, the Act does not explicitly outline criminal or civil penalties for non-compliance with its provisions regarding the revocation of TCOs. However, failing to comply with the statutory requirements, such as not revoking a TCO when the conditions are met, could lead to legal challenges or administrative actions. The revocation of a TCO could have significant financial implications for importers who relied on the tariff concessions, potentially leading to disputes or litigation.
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 5/2011 revoked TCO 0803926, which covered utility tubs, on 02 June 2010. The CEO's decision to revoke the TCO was based on the satisfaction that A Plus Plastics Pty Ltd and Award Brands Pty Ltd were producers of substitutable goods in Australia and that the CEO would not have made the TCO if the application were lodged on the day the revocation request was made. The Revocation date of effect was 7 April 2010, as stipulated by the Act. This revocation highlights the importance of the statutory framework in ensuring that tariff concessions are only granted when necessary and are revoked when substitutable goods are produced in Australia.